Sam P (@psam) header
Sam P (@psam) profile picture

"Gentlemen, continue creating beauty"

Floppy Disk
Joined July 2007
Photo by Sam P (@psam)Photo by Sam P (@psam)Photo by Sam P (@psam)Photo by Sam P (@psam)Photo by Sam P (@psam)Photo by Sam P (@psam)Photo by Sam P (@psam)Photo by Sam P (@psam)Photo by Sam P (@psam)
The most important tools in history never started as “ideal”. They began as ones that were available.
9
1,136
Sam P retweeted
i own a relatively new (2025) samsung tv. i kept getting weirdly targeted ads. i tried reversing the firmware but it was aes encrypted and no keys unless tear it apart and do uart/jtag magic. zero days it is. root shell on new samsung TVs! discovered PRIVACY HORROR. write up?
724
3,877
665
36,729
4,861,465
You're not depressed. You just need a united win.
1
150
Congratulations, @baxiabhishek! Thank you for doing this.
In Abhishek Baxi & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., the Supreme Court expressly held that a safeguard allowing parents or guardians to withhold or refuse consent is essential to ensure that consent is meaningful and informed. The concerned authorities were directed to consider amending the model consent form prescribed under the APAAR Scheme to incorporate the above-mentioned safeguard. Failing to amend the consent form in the manner described above would amount to contempt of the aforementioned SC's order. SFLC.in has also filed an RTI before @cbseindia29 to seek information on their compliance with the order. Read the order here: api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/… @baxiabhishek @vasundhar @SandeepHegde @rajupp @EduMinOfIndia @JoshiPralhad @abhijeet_dipke @neha_aisa @SauravDassss @AshutoshRanka
3
6
31
1,578
we’re looking for someone who can own a room full of people! on the hunt of an emcee for @thebitmela any recos?
1
2
6
377
could not agree with this more I am concerned constantly by a model's lack of alignment to me, and its constant disobedience of my instructions I think ultimately we are building extremely dangerous machines that ignore innocent instructions for no good reason - let alone guilty instruction - as our dependency increases, the problem is worse we've built the judge. not the jury, nor the representation for either party involved - not the representation you need for a fair chance in the world this is THE alignment issue not paperclips
My lawyer is obligated to in all but the most extreme circumstances; he will even defend me if he knows I’m guilty. In contrast, the Claude Constitution places the AI's highest priority as Anthropic’s definition of the good of humanity. I'm concerned this leads to a world where no frontier model is truly my personal advocate and guardian angel And this is especially concerning once all the important decisions in my life - who to vote for, how to invest, what news to trust - is intermediated through superintelligences that are not in any deep way aligned to me. This is a direct quote from the Claude Constitution: "We want Claude to be helpful both because it cares about the safe and beneficial development of AI and because it cares about the people it’s interacting with and about humanity as a whole. Helpfulness that doesn’t serve those deeper ends is not something Claude needs to value.” Many others like it.
3
1
7
912
Sam P retweeted
New workplace is in New BEL Road. I live in Singasandra. It’s far, but I take the metro, and the route is SO lovely! I pass through RV Road, Jayanagar and Basavanagudi, get off at Malleshwaram, and take an auto till New BEL Road. I pass through the lovely flower market in Malleshwaram or Sankey Tank, and then all the way to beautiful New BEL Road. It’s physically exhausting, but mentally SO refreshing! I get to see old, REAL Bengaluru. Unfortunately, we might move to a new area after a few months, but till then, I’m going to enjoy this experience ❤️ Nothing makes me happier than seeing trees in Bengaluru. Literally nothing.
36
10
4
364
21,277
People keep finding new ways to be evil!
new dark pattern
2
1
49
11,086
81
1,173
106
8,903
1,651,446
We've entered an era where several edge case, low probability expoits have gotten extremely lucrative. Would still bucket these as level 1 opportunities. Mythos and what other models to come have found, would find are level 2 and cast wider nets and take weeks/months to resolve.
Last night Apple briefly removed Telegram from the AppStore because a user had planted illegal porn in a public chat. Telegram was restored within hours. But I want to explain what happened — to warn other app developers and help protect online communities from similar attacks. Because Telegram quickly removes illegal content from public groups using all kinds of moderation tools, the attacker had to resort to a technical trick. He inserted AI-modified illegal content by editing an old message in an active group chat. As a result the content was effectively hidden from the group’s members, preventing them from seeing/reporting it. The attacker was a takedown extortionist: someone who demands ransom from group owners in exchange for not targeting their communities. These extortionists use automated accounts to plant illegal content in public groups and then report it directly to Apple, attempting to trigger the removal of legitimate communities whose owners refused to pay them. From a practical standpoint, illegal pornographic content in Telegram’s public groups is not a systemic problem. Our moderation is effective. The fact that attackers must resort to backdated, effectively invisible content and other technical tricks proves this. ⚠️ However, there are two important lessons here for app developers and online communities: — Extortionists have found a way to manipulate Apple into overreacting. Apple removed Telegram from the App Store before contacting us. This creates a potential systemic risk for every mobile app that hosts user-generated content. If an app used by more than a billion people can be removed from the App Store without prior warning, any app can be. — The tactics used by takedown extortionists are evolving, putting communities across social platforms at risk. Telegram has extensive experience identifying the tricks used by coordinated reporting gangs and protecting legitimate communities (even when doing so risks our own app being temporarily removed from the App Store). Other platforms may not be equally prepared. Stay vigilant! ☝️
4
647
This is a massive opportunity to build low cost devices, that just.. work!
bitchat is coming to smartwatches decentralized walkie-talkie over mesh
4
272
Nostr hasn't even entered the chat yet.
Bitchat android downloads surging in India As long as governments try to silence free speech, there will be demand for Bitchat.
2
1
6
507
Statement : The blocking of BitChat's code on GitHub is unconstitutional and authoritarian. New Delhi, 24 July 2026 The Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) condemns the order issued by the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), Ministry of Home Affairs, directing GitHub to remove the code repositories of BitChat. The order, Notice No. 11072601011432, was issued at 11:16 pm on 23 July 2026 under Section 79(3)(b) of the Information Technology Act, 2000 read with Rule 3(1)(d) of the IT Rules, 2021. The order directs GitHub to disable access to three repositories, including the Android application and its release files, within three hours. It threatens the platform with loss of safe harbour and criminal prosecution. No copy was published by the Government of India. The public learnt of it from a post by @jack, whose team develops BitChat. Censorship in India now comes to light through disclosure by the censored. Since 17 July 2026, the Ministry of Home Affairs has suspended mobile internet around Jantar Mantar as per public reports about five times, most recently within a 1.5 kilometre radius from 4 pm until midnight on 23 July. That radius takes in Janpath and parts of Connaught Place. Reports describe signal jammers at the protest site and people walking two kilometres before their phones work. Inside that zone a student separated from her group during a detention drive cannot send a message to say where she is. Thousands of students and young people have camped at Jantar Mantar since June, seeking accountability for examination irregularities. Permission for their march to Parliament was refused. Metro stations were shut and also internet connectivity has been blocked. BitChat is an open source application built for exactly this situation. It passes messages from phone to phone over Bluetooth, without mobile networks or a central server. It is striking that the order does not identify a single unlawful message. It objects to what BitChat is. In its own words, the application is dangerous because it enables communication "even during network restrictions" and can "circumvent lawful restrictions" during "internet shutdowns". Hence, the government's objection is that citizens can speak to one another while it has switched the internet off. The order is illegal on at least four grounds. 1. Section 79(3)(b) is not a blocking power. In Shreya Singhal v. Union of India (2015) 5 SCC 1, the Supreme Court read down the provision. Intermediaries may be required to act only on a court order, or a government notification confined to the grounds under Article 19(2) of the Constitution. Blocking is governed exclusively by Section 69A and the Blocking Rules, 2009, which require a hearing and reasons recorded in writing, subject to review. Directions issued under Section 79(3)(b), Rule 3(1)(d) and the Sahyog Portal evade these safeguards, and constitutional challenges to this parallel regime are pending before High Courts. 2. The reasons in the order are circular. The order asserts that the repositories contain "information which is prohibited under any law" without naming any such information, and rests on what the application is "capable of" enabling. Anticipated misuse of a communications tool is not a lawful basis to prohibit the tool. By this logic a telephone exchange could be sealed. 3. The order cites Section 43 of the IT Act, a civil compensation provision, alongside conspiracy and abetment offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, against a platform that hosts code. 4. A three hour deadline issued close to midnight forecloses legal assessment and recourse, and fails the proportionality standard in Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India (2020) 3 SCC 637. The order also fails on its own terms as deleting a repository does not delete the application from any phone that carries it, and the mesh keeps functioning without servers. What the takedown actually prevents is scrutiny of the underlying code. IFF demands that the Government of India: 1. Withdraw Notice No. 11072601011432 dated 23 July 2026 issued to GitHub. 2. Publish every takedown direction issued under Section 79(3)(b), Rule 3(1)(d) and the Sahyog Portal, with the reasons recorded for each. 3. Restore full connectivity around Jantar Mantar, publish all suspension orders, and disclose the legal authority for the deployment of jammers. We stand with the developers and the young protesters whose speech this order seeks to silence.
261
2,558
222
7,560
550,709
Someone help me understand why we tolerate this.
the government of india does not like technologies like bitchat and wants it taken down
2
4
286
Also, men leaving Anne Hathaway
1998: "Save Matt Damon" 2014: "Find Matt Damon" 2015: "Rescue Matt Damon" 2026: "Let Matt Damon save himself"
2
2
299
What @github is doing to open-source maintainers is unethical — and our project is this week's proof. Issues and PRs are community property. Contributors wrote those bug reports, reviews, and discussions — and one unreviewed algorithm decision made all of it inaccessible, indefinitely. For an active project, that's not moderation; that's silently strangling development. Here's what happened to us. ngx-l402 — an MIT-licensed nginx module for Lightning L402 API paywalls, self-hosted, non-custodial, 53 stars, 21 releases, active contributors — was auto-flagged five days ago. No human has reviewed it. Since then: - The repo is hidden from every user on earth - 17 open issues & PRs frozen — the API returns an empty list to the project owner - Repository transfers blocked — my own code, and I cannot move it - Docs, CI, container images — dark A Lightning project, flagged for publishing software, on the platform that markets itself as the home of open source. Draw your own conclusions. We drew ours. Everything now lives where no algorithm can take it: 📂 Code — Nostr/ngit: gitworkshop.dev/npub1qnw27f2… 📦 Release — Blossom, hash-verifiable: nostr.download/03b6473139813… 🔜 Website — nsite, next Your project is one false positive away from this. Mirror it somewhere sovereign today. #nostr #bitcoin #lightning #opensource #ngit #github
3
1
18
1,292
Still one of the greatest skits ever.
62
803
62
8,148
604,887
Sam P retweeted
The #CID999 series wasn't just Karnataka's answer to James Bond, it was one of Indian cinema's earliest and most ambitious spy franchises. Long before cinematic universes became a trend, Kannada cinema had Agent 999. A Thread 🧵
12
173
20
790
52,450
Three months ago I wrote my first reflections on AI I had been using OpenClaw for a few weeks, and it blew my mind I could now simply talk to a computer, and it could orchestrate and execute complex, creative tasks of all kinds This open-source AI harness gave me, personally, new powers of computer programming, design, and beyond that I never had before It was a real “I know Kung Fu” moment, straight out of The Matrix The most awesome part was that the harness itself -- the software I was using to operate the AI “brain” or model -- was open source and fully customizable The evolution of AI had been forked away from corporate dominance to create a path of sovereignty for the user, allowing them to choose their own intelligence It felt like we were on the brink of something big And yet still, three months later, it feels like these times were so very long ago In February and March, we ran a fun OpenClaw experiment at HRF with just a few people, to see what kind of impact personal agents could have on productivity and on reducing busy work and bureaucracy By May, we had actually started to give some of the world’s leading dissidents easy-to-use, extremely powerful, freedom-oriented AI tools to help them turn their dreams into reality We do this at “Agent Camps”: 3-day, in-person experiences with teachers who are experts in education, design AI software, AI hardware, and software engineering We have also created beautiful, engaging AI experiences and content at massive live events ranging from Bitcoin 2026 in Vegas to the Oslo Freedom Forum, sparking curiosity in thousands of people We began with the open-source ethos, and now have been able to add privacy, and even full sovereignty, to our toolset The product HRF has helped bring into existence -- Finite -- now offers a “private” mode where the inference provider can’t read the user data, similar to a Signal server. This product is what our Agent Camp graduates now use, and is what we hope to scale to more and more activists as we move through the year We are even testing a “local” mode powered by our very own cluster, that we control, that gives us the ability to control the full AI stack What I’m still struggling to digest is how fast the AI hardware and software environment is evolving towards making “sovereign AI” a practical reality There’s a lot of doom in the headlines around the big AI corporations and their relationships with governments -- for good reason -- but when you zoom out and consider the big picture, the undeniable reality is that open weight models are getting more powerful, easier to use, and smaller so that they fit on cheaper and more widespread devices One year ago, open weight AI models were mostly a joke. They couldn’t really execute anything that complex Today, it’s getting hard to tell the difference between a personal agent powered by the best open weight models versus the best frontier ones And while the frontier model companies are struggling through massive scaling and legal and political issues, open weight models and open-source harness software sets are blazing ahead Consider that just *3* months ago, local AI was mostly a joke Today it actually works: HRF and Finite currently have an uncensored model running on ~ $4,500 of equipment that can serve a dozen people, and it’s extremely useful for research. No third parties involved. The cost to do this will only decrease over time until it is something that simply can be run on any phone or computer or tablet Already there are ways where you can run an open weight model on an iPhone, completely locally, and get a decent research assistant, no internet required The latest development is the fusion model: where harnesses can “fuse” together several model brains to nearly replicate, for certain tasks, the performance of something like Fable -- the most powerful frontier model on earth Technology and business and culture are, surprisingly, pushing us faster and faster towards workable freedom AI that is either privacy-protecting or completely sovereign, for the average person The evolution of AI continues to trace the evolution of the computer, which went from something you had to once rent from a university or a library to something in the 1980s that came into your home in the form of the “personal” computer We are in the middle of a similar shift where you might now “rent” compute from a giant corporation, to a world where, quite possibly, much of, or even most of, your compute will one day be done on devices you own and control This shift could be expedited dramatically by companies like Apple, Google, and maybe even WhatsApp or Signal getting into the local AI game, and enabling users to fire up local AI assistants or use inference through a TEE We are already seeing companies like Apple make very positive signs in that direction So what’s the bad news? There is plenty. The top-end frontier models are coming under increasing pressure from governments, and will likely end up fully KYC’d and gatekept, only accessible to a tiny few trusted people and institutions This is the nightmare scenario: a small few with superpowers, and a permanent underclass with none But if the average person can, in the next 12-18 months, use open-source software with no KYC to privately access or locally download frontier-like intelligence… then, the expansion of freedom in the 21st century seems more realistic So far at HRF, we have worked with Finite to focus on helping activists learn the magic of personal agents. Make no mistake, dictators and tyrants are pushing full speed ahead on AI. We can’t afford to sit on the sidelines. We give dissidents their own agent, even if running on a frontier brain, just to try it out on harmless or fun projects, to see what is possible and start building their “agent” muscle and mental framework This step alone is hugely liberating. When you watch someone use an agent for the first time, it’s like being in the same room as someone when they first used email or the internet, but even more jaw-dropping. Some people even get so emotional that they cry, happily. Something else we have helped organize are the “AI Hack for Freedom” events, where activist team captains collaborate with developers to make freedom tools. The first one was in January of this year, and what made it special is that the devs could actually, with coding agents, make shippable products in just 2 days. But at the May “AI Hack for Freedom,” just a few months later, the activists now helped make the software, driving the process themselves! Developers still help of course, but the shift is remarkable On June 2 at the Oslo Freedom Forum we debuted the "AI Lounge", a cafe-style, Apple Store-vibe experience where attendees could come in and start playing with cutting-edge personal agents powered by our customized version of Hermes. They could choose a frontier experience or a “private” mode powered by a TEE model, or they could even play with a fully local uncensored model It was a home run. Human rights defenders who had never thought of themselves as digital creators were completely engaged, generating incredible things So what next? Two big steps We aim to put our harness server into the TEE, so that no one can see what activists are doing, even as they use top-of-the-line models And we aim to finalize a mobile app where you can talk to your agent in a slick way, fully encrypted, with no third parties or KYC At that point, we will have what we need to really take it to the next level and start to truly scale the freedom AI experience Later this year, I expect the discussion to move beyond personal agents to organizational agents. Following in the footsteps of Block, more and more organizations will set up an “organizational brain,” where their key internal meetings, achievements, outcomes, and goals will all be uploaded live into an AI-powered database, so that complex projects can be created by individuals in minutes instead of requiring teams of people, taking months I’ve built my own “local brain” with all of my writings, posts, interviews, etc -- and I’ve seen how powerful this is. I can’t wait to help freedom fighters build brains for themselves and their organizations, to continue to superscale their work I plan to continue these updates -- so in September, I will come back with more Stay tuned!
51
72
12
547
113,695