Hello, it's been a while. I hope everyone is doing well. Where there is love, there is life. Happy Valentines day.
Currently flying in a private jet and snorting iPhone size lines of cocaine with my best friend @LucaNetz. Discussing web3 and other metaverse concepts. From up here, everyone looks like little bugs 😂🥂
I’ve noticed new cope…
Vindictive expired women wag their fingers and schoolmarm at the Playboy
Calling him a “hoe,” and “Ran through”
Advanced lies of Woke Feminists:
Equating their promiscuity,
To our Victories.
Because they are
not Worth winning.
Trannies say this too
1
13
2,054
You are addicted to lying.
>Thanks for @'ing me as they've blocked me and all Remilia personnel to prevent us from seeing or replying directly.
First of all, i didnt notice you unblocked me. I only counterblocked you because i was knew you'd try to pull this dumb card.
>Remilia sold one (1) LP generated $FUMO fee on day 1 for project expenses,
The project expenses were sub $50k, and i dont get it? was the $900k in LP fees not enough? why dump on holders at the pico top causing a death spiral for the token and incurring massive losses on behalf of the community? you also paid contributors in a token (while proclaiming to me in private that you "dont pay people in volatile assets"), forcing them to dump too, if they wanted to see any cash value for their work.
>and thereafter announced the commitment to burn all the following LP generated $FUMO fees, forever, which we did, amounting to a total of 16 burned $FUMO, over a quarter million in value (far more than Remilia's single day 1 sale of $FUMO).
You have never been good at math charlie. The current marketvalue of 16 fumo is $118k, not $250k, and market price of burnt $FUMO isnt even a fair value assessment. Burning a bonding curve token sets a floor, valuing it at mark to market is just dumb, and using xy=k the burn is worth about $9,000, not a quarter of a million. Your value estimate is off by about 96%.
>This all happened in public, none of it is news to the project; the only thing that's new is the incredibly dishonest framing.
No, it didnt happen in public. The one dishonestly framing things is you. You only commented on this after getting called out by @AmirOrmu on July 8.
>a result of me recently rejecting their latest ransom demands and turning the lawsuit machine back on.
You are again talking about, and misrepresenting, the terms of mediation we attempted last week, which was strictly confidential. Do you really think a judge will look kindly on this behavior?
unavailable











