Vonyll🌸 retweeted
Day 7/30
Let’s start by writing down the ideas and take it one step at a time
#trusttheprocess30days
I spent the whole of day 4/5 asking if I’d be able to keep up and ended up with nothing
So, today-I didn’t question it, I just shot it
This is day 6/30 of #trusttheprocess30days
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
X AI ALGORITHM UPDATE 🚨
X updated their open source algorithm yesterday and the early likes matter even more now. Small accounts should focus on: writing posts people hit like on and read till the end (so write to be read)
tl;dr:
- X's open source code got new scores on Nov 5, the first change in 3 weeks
- likes: 0.66 → 0.708 (highest yet)
- time spent on a post: 0.006 → 0.0075
- tapping into a post: 0.3 → 0.274
- opening a video: 0.02 → 0
- new rule: AI replies may get flagged under big accounts as "llm slop" and may not reach the person's notifications
lesson learned: a tap isn't the win anymore. Someone staying and liking is.
full details:
- The new numbers
Up: likes 0.66 → 0.708, time spent on a post 0.006 → 0.0075, shares 2 → 2.118.
Down: tapping into a post 0.3 → 0.274, staying 10+ seconds after a tap 0.4 → 0.385, opening a video 0.02 → 0.
"Not interested" got a bit harsher, -52.27 → -53.07.
Copy link, replies, quotes, DM shares and follows didn't move.
X didn't explain any of this. It's just what the code says now.
(I check the open source algo daily with Claude and share updates with you)
- Look at where this has gone in a month
In early October a like was worth 0.5. Now it's 0.708.
Time spent was 0.004. Now it's 0.0075, nearly double.
A tap was 0.3 and it's going down.
Every change points the same way. X keeps paying more for people who stay.
- Why that matters if you're small
My read: you can't win on big numbers, but you can win on the people who do see your post. If they stay and like it, that counts for more today than it did last week. And those early likes also decide which new post gets the extra push.
- Video and your profile
X also switched on two new guesses in its ranking: how long someone keeps watching after they open a video, and how long they spend on a profile after tapping it.
I can't tell you what those are worth. The only file that lists them is out of date, so I won't guess a number.
My read: opening a video dropped to 0 the same day because X cares more about people who keep watching. So make the first seconds count, and make your profile worth sticking around on.
- A new rule for replies under big accounts
X runs an AI check on replies under accounts with over 250K followers. Flagged replies can get a label that lasts 14 to 30 days. One of the flags is literally called "llm slop" (AI slop, as I read it).
That part isn't new. This is: X's rules now say a labeled reply or mention doesn't reach the person's notifications unless they follow you.
Grey badge accounts and accounts X rates as highly credible skip this label. Small accounts get no such pass.
I can see the rule, I can't see if every notification goes through it yet. Either way, write your own replies.
- What didn't change
Your new posts still get their extra push in the first 2 hours and first 200 views, and they still don't get cut first.
Here's a recap of what you should be doing:
- likes just hit 0.708, the most they've ever been worth
- each second someone spends on your post is worth 25% more than last week
- staying 10+ seconds after a tap earns 0.385 on top of the tap
- reply in your own words, under big accounts especially
- make your profile worth a visit, X now guesses how long people spend there
- for video, hold attention early, just getting the open now scores 0
- being read to the end also helps X find you new readers
- originals from accounts below 50K can jump to around spot 16
- early viewers liking it is what wins that lift
- your first 2 hours and 200 views are the window, so publish when your people are online
- the biggest single number is still 20, for someone copying your link
- quotes, DM shares and replies earn 5 apiece
- back and forth between mutuals is worth 20, so follow back your regulars
- strangers only get shown your originals
- the 1st like and the 32nd like each open another route to new people
- a second post of yours in the same feed drops to 62%, so make one count
- the video lists want clips over 10 seconds
- +4 when a post is likely to earn you a new follower
- your pinned post can affect the whole account, so take a look at it
What you should NOT be doing:
- pasting AI replies under big accounts, "llm slop" is a real flag at X
- copy-paste replies, a duplicate label means they never get notified
- chasing the tap, it's down to 0.274 and falling
- off-topic posts, one likely "not interested" costs -53.07
- a video that only gets opened earns nothing for the open
- publishing at 3am burns your 2 hour window
- relying on replies and reposts to reach new people, they stay with your followers
- getting an insult label, non-followers won't see that post at all
- low quality and misinfo labels bring a warning, and non-followers can't like or share
- adult media in 3 of your last 5 posts gets the whole account labeled
- X rechecks videos for hidden content at 64 and 512 likes
- piling your replies under a big account's post can sink your own score
- one label on the account and non-followers stop seeing you
- a link to a badly rated site in your pinned post risks a 7 day label
- reusing your own wording word for word risks the copypasta flag
- pairing a low quality link with tags of strangers looks like spam to X
- engagement bait gets labeled no matter how big you are
- posting several in a row, they fight each other for the same feed
- hashtag stuffing does nothing
- counting on bookmarks, they're worth 0
- expecting For You to show a post past 48 hours
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
Good morning Lovelies…..
𝗔 𝘃𝗮𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗮 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗸 𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗸, 𝗶𝘁 𝗳𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘀 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗻𝗼𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘁.
Every transaction on Starknet leans on 2 separate protections, and they are built on different ground.
▸ Signatures are the lock on the door and decide who is allowed in
▸ @Starknet proofs are the audit of the whole building and confirm every move followed the rules
STARK proofs are hash based, so they do not rest on the elliptic curve assumptions behind many signature schemes, which means the audit and the lock face quantum pressure in different ways.
Native account abstraction turns every account into a programmable smart contract, so the lock can be swapped for a stronger one at the account level without waiting on a network-wide upgrade.
Each account still has to make that swap itself, and that is the honest part of the story.
Underneath it all, Starknet is an L2 that settles on Ethereum, so part of its security picture follows Ethereum’s cryptography and migration timeline.
That is why Starknet is exploring an independent L1 to have more say over core security upgrades, and it is still an exploration and not a finished product.
Starknet is preparing for quantum threats and is not claiming to be finished.
The StarkWare Quantum Hub assesses 8 capabilities for changing cryptography, and its counts reflect public evidence within its defined scope.
Source and methodology, checked October 15th 2026.
[ quantum.starkware.co ]
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
Something happened between me and my closest friend, and honestly, I still don't know if I was wrong.
Last year, my friend sent me ₦850,000 to keep for her because she said she didn't trust herself with money.
I agreed.
For almost eight months, the money stayed untouched in my account.
Then one evening, she called me crying. She needed the money urgently because she had an emergency.
I told her I would send it immediately.
But before I could transfer the money, she sent me another message:
"Please, don't forget the ₦30,000 you owe me from last year. Remove it from the money."
I was confused.
I asked her what ₦30,000 she was talking about.
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
Happy Sunday guys. New week prayer🙏
Lord as we start the new week, we beg for your presence to be with us. May all our expectations be fulfilled. May the good things of life come to us from every corner. Cleanse our mind from worries, fill our days with your peace and renew our hope. Amen 🙏
Good morning friends.
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
Why would God punish the child for the sins of his forefathers? Why punish an innocent person for what happened before they were born?
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
Story has it that the man in the picture attached, popularly known as ‘Baba Jehovah’, was insulted by a young man on TikTok during his livestream. The guy asked him what he had been doing with his youth. That they are using the name of Jesus to deceive people.
Baba has never been known to ask anyone for money. He simply comes on TikTok Live, prays for people and quietly leaves. In fact, he was even dodging gifts, apparently because he didn’t understand what they were.
Then this young man shows up on his live and starts speaking to him in a very condescending manner, asking him what he had achieved with his youth.
Unfortunately, Baba broke down in tears during the livestream before eventually logging off. He hasn’t been seen live for days now.
This is so disheartening, why do some rich young men have this mentality about older men without wealth? This is not nice at all.
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
You want God to kill Satan because you're having a bad day, can you kill your own child? 🥲
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
I started this account 43 days ago.
Yesterday, I received my first X payout: $3,476.20.
I went from 26 followers on September 25 to almost 6,000 today.
HERE ARE 3 QUICK TIPS I'D GIVE ANYONE TRYING TO GROW ON X 👇🧵
Vonyll🌸 retweeted
#trusttheprocess30days
7/30
"Who is Kennedy Benson?..."
Day 7/30
#trusttheprocess30days
Day 6/30.
....the human mind is heavy, burdened by what we know, what we cannot comprehend, and all that we dream of becoming....
#trusttheprocess30days
Day 7/30
#trusttheprocess30days
Day 6/30.
....the human mind is heavy, burdened by what we know, what we cannot comprehend, and all that we dream of becoming....
#trusttheprocess30days





















