Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach) header
Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach) profile picture

Senior Fellow, @AEI. Studying America's separation of powers. Formerly @RSI, @BrookingsInst. Author of Why Congress, https://xitter.gq/t.co/NbK86BtcWv

Washington, DC
Joined February 2011
Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)Photo by Philip Wallach (@PhilipWallach)
With some accidental winners in the 2026 House contests, I wondered who are the most unlikely U.S. Reps in history? My colleague John Fortier points me to Chicago's Mike Flanagan, a Republican who beat Dan Rostenkowski in 1994 and then lost to Rod Blagojevich in 1996! Epic. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michae…
6
4
1,209
Other good candidates that AI feeds me: Vermont's first statewide elected Democrat in a century, William H. Meyer, elected 1958 for a single term. thecrimson.com/article/1960/…
1
159
Kerry Bentivolio, reindeer farmer, snuck in when Rep. Thad McCotter failed to submit the necessary number of signatures to be on the ballot in 2012. Served a single term. michiganpublic.org/politics-…
1
2
134
Please revisit the Indiana redistricting fight. Turns out, Hoosiers' attachment to their particular representatives meant they kept them. Contrast NC, where GOP tried to squeeze every last bit of partisan advantage, and the House delegation will now mostly be Dems.
New piece from me @thedispatch (which sure is pretty these days). If the assonant headline isn't enough to pull you in, come for the discussion of the competing theories of representation that are slugging it out in our gerrymandering wars this year.
1
1
6
378
See the Senate floor speeches, too. xitter.gq/PhilipWallach/status/1…
Replying to @PhilipWallach
Video archived here: iga.in.gov/session/2026/vide… Goode, lauding "Hoosier common sense": 1:13-1:26. Deery, a standout, explaining why he believes mid-cycle redistricting harms people's trust in faithful representation, and why his institutional conservatism leads him to oppose: 2:01-2:09. Garten, most impassioned speech for redistricting, basically the Flight 93 argument: 2:10-2:25. Gaskill, most involved presentation showing why Ds have it coming, and then more Flight 93 stuff, 2:27-2:56.
59
Rep. Jeff Hurd seems to be holding on to his seat (CO-03), one of the rare good-news stories for the GOP in this midterm. Very much worth revisiting this @charleshilu73 story from March for lessons.
1
1
8
770
Philip Wallach retweeted
This is wild. Democrats would've basically swept the state if Republicans redistricted as Trump demanded. The only survivor would've been Erin Houchin.
This is insane! Here is a map of yesterday’s Indiana House results if they were drawn under the attempted Republican gerrymander map from last Fall. Thank you to @Vulst3 for breaking down the data to make this map. The gerrymander could’ve netted us a 9-0 or 8-1 map potentially!
29
448
19
3,571
276,425
On top of all the other U.S. House craziness this year, behold: the return of the New England Republican!
The Maine secretary of state's office has announced that #ME02 is going to ranked-choice tabulations. Paul LePage (R) got a majority of votes in the race, but not a majority of *total ballots cast.* However, this is just a formality; LePage should still win.
4
1
19
2,495
This sentiment made more sense when 2026 was going to be a normal good or excellent midterm year for Dems. Given that it was a historic blowout that will give Dems the biggest working House majority in generations, they should really aim higher! 290 veto override in play.
Oversight will dominate the Democrats’ agenda come January. The risk is that they get bogged down in futile attempts to boot Donald Trump from the White House economist.com/united-states/…
1
3
431
(Of course it's not either/or. Surely they will go all out on oversight, as they should. Just don't know why they would preemptively limit their legislative aspirations. Getting 5-6 GOP Senators to break filibusters is a lot easier than 9-10 would be!)
1
144
👀
🚨 it's official: the House Blue Dog Coalition will double in size to at least 20 members (and counting) BARK BARK BARK 🐶
1
5
448
Seems to have won in MN-01. Will be interested to see how members-elect like Johnson shape the Democratic Party going forward. Plenty of new members will want their party to solidify its position as the normal guys fighting for the American dream; plenty of others not!
My closing message to you. To the people of southern Minnesota: thank you for sharing your stories with me over the past 18 months. This Tuesday, I hope you’ll give me the chance to fight for our home in Congress.
268
Thinking ahead: there should be 290 votes in the House and 67 votes in the Senate to restrict presidential power in many ways. Thinking about 2029 should motivate plenty of GOP members. Before yesterday, veto overrides seemed far-fetched. Today, they are very much in play.
2
9
2
60
5,554
Also worth watching out for: chambers as litigants. Going to be a lot of issues hauled into court.
Reminder: for the first time since Obama's last two years, we are going to have a Senate majority not of the president's party. How that affects the executive calendar remains to be seen, but it's an obvious important conflict point we haven't dealt with yet in the post-2016 era.
1
3
1
5
1,302
Philip Wallach retweeted
The 1994 “revolution” saw Rs win the popular vote by 6.8 pts 2006 was D + 7.9 2010 was R + 6.8 2018 was D + 8.6 2026 Ds are tracking toward a 13-pt popular vote win Have to go back half a century—the post-Watergate wipeout of 1974, D + 16.8 pts—to find anything like this.
Spent the last month wondering if 2026 could be 2006 all over again. Nope. Bigger by every metric. In fact, the biggest midterm wave in modern history—an election to which every future midterm will be compared.
21
598
32
2,136
262,157
Note well. Republicans who voted to remove Speaker Kevin McCarthy in October 2023: Andy Biggs - leaving, ran for AZ Gov (lost) Ken Buck - left House March 2024 Tim Burchett - reelected for the 120th Eli Crane - losing a nailbiter as of now Matt Gaetz - left after 2024 Bob Good - lost 2024 primary when Trump opposed Nancy Mace - leaving, ran for SC Gov (lost), seat flipped Matt Rosendale - left 2024 to run for MT Gov (withdrew)
5
8
3
80
41,469
Looking beyond that crazy 8, if we look at who initially didn't vote for McCarthy back in January 2023, the trend is less obvious, but still discernible: Dan Bishop - left 2024, ran for NC AG (lost) Lauren Boebert - lost 2026 Josh Brecheen - reelected 2026 Mike Cloud - probably reelected 2026 Andrew Clyde - reelected 2026 Byron Donalds - left 2026, Gov.-Elect of Florida Paul Gosar - reelected 2026 Andy Harris - reelected 2026 Anna Paulina Luna - reelected 2026, barely Mary Miller - reelected 2026 Ralph Norman - left 2026, ran for SC Sen (lost prim) Andy Ogles - lost 2026 primary Scott Perry - lost 2026 Chip Roy - left 2026, ran for TX AG (lost prim) Keith Self - reelected 2026 Victoria Spartz - lost 2026
1
1
3
2,587
Sometimes people remember the party's 2023 problems as "The Freedom Caucus rebelled," but it was really more idiosyncratic than that. And a healthy majority of those who were trouble for GOP leaders will be gone in 2027. So the Minority Leader's job will be a lot easier!
3
1,551