This web show on technology for product development. You determine the winner of each spirited debate, with the loser facing consequences in a future episode.
Joined August 2012
- Tweets184
- Following0
- Followers75
- Likes0
@DSEnovia's ability to manage federated sources of #requirements was discussed on #Tech4PD > buff.ly/1eMhfwd
Not much time left. Weigh in and vote on whether embedded software is ready to be managed in #PLM or not > buff.ly/1eMhfwd
@SiemensPLM's longstanding ability to manage compiled software in #PLM was discussed on #Tech4PD > buff.ly/1eMhfwd
In this episode of #Tech4PD, who do you want to see win? Or better yet, who should lose and get a consequence? > buff.ly/1eMhfwd
Prominent #PLM provider @PTC with its acquisition of MKS was mentioned on #Tech4PD > buff.ly/1eMhfwd
Disagree with @jim_techclarity or @chadkjackson? Join the discussion and give 'em the business > buff.ly/1eMhfwd
What #ALM providers were discussed on #Tech4PD? The first one mentioned was @ibmrational. Check it out! > buff.ly/1eMhfwd
@chadkjackson & @jim_techclarity are at it again. They're debating if embedded software should be managed in #PLM > buff.ly/1eMhfwd
New #Tech4PD show! > CFD – What’s more important? Integration or Specialization bit.ly/16GOf75
How does the #cloud play into #mobile #PLM access? @AutodeskPLM360 discussed on the latest #Tech4PD > buff.ly/1a7BKB9
Don't care @ the #mobile #PLM debate? Vote to make @ChadKJackson or @Jim_TechClarity perform the next consequence > buff.ly/1a7BKB9