Pinned Tweet
A patchwork of state/local #drone laws will create a chaotic NAS. A single Federal regulatory structure is vital for successful integration.
Significant changes in the law, that affect recreational #drone flyers (formerly called โhobbyistsโ), become effective today. See: faa.gov/news/updates/?newsIdโฆ
.@FAAnews has an email address for every single registered #drone owner, and the FAR Part 48 System of Records Notice (SORN) (faa.gov/news/updates/media/1โฆ), specifically reads:
Notice to be published in the Federal Register tomorrow, May 17, 2019 โ โException for Limited Recreational Operations of Unmanned Aircraftโ s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspโฆ #drone #drones
If the allegations are true, Vigilant Drone Defense not only violated 18 USC 32, but also violated The Communications Act of 1934 and FCC regulations. It could face hefty fines, equipment seizures & imprisonment. @MiamiPD @FCC @FAANews #drones wsvn.com/news/investigationsโฆ
More details provided, than in the earlier Reuterโs article โ bloomberg.com/news/articles/โฆ #drones
U.S. proposes to allow expanded #drones operation at night, over people โ reuters.com/article/us-usa-dโฆ
The โQualificationsโ requirement for membership ignores entirely the consideration of those who actually fly #drones, and is therefore utter bullshit. How about trying to be considered under the โrare circumstancesโ provision, which should not be โrareโ at all. (SMH)
All of the relevant information regarding applying for #Drone Advisory Committee membership can be found in the Federal Register publication here: govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2โฆ #drones
How about some regular people who are recreational model aircraft operators, or who are Part 107 pilots? Neither type of person is represented in the DAC membership now.
FAA Seeks New #Drone Advisory Group Members: faa.gov/news/updates/?newsIdโฆ #drones
.@bwynne & @GaryShapiro pen this piece on the ULCโs โTort Law Relating to Drones Act,โ and its proposal to create utter chaos w/in the 1st 200โ of airspace, where most #drones operate: j.mp/2CHeGPC. (NB: The Committeeโs โReporterโ (drafter) is @AirMapIOโs co-founder.)
New NOTAMs โ FAA Restricts #Drones Operating Near DOD, DOE, USN and USCG Facilities and Mobile Assets โ faa.gov/news/updates/?newsIdโฆ
Now, about 72% of all #drone operations will no longer be (indirectly) supporting @AirMapIO's self-serving efforts to make flying more restrictive, less safe and ultimately more expensive through state/local permitting, etc. Bold & wise move by @DJIGlobal.
xitter.gq/TheDroneGuy/status/105โฆ
.@DJIGlobal updates & vastly improves its GEO system for #drone flights near airports & severs ties w/@AirMapIO, the leading proponent of a chaotic, unsafe (but profitable) "patchwork" of state/local drone laws. Will use @PrecisionHawk geospatial data now. bit.ly/2SdMg4Z
.@DJIGlobal updates & vastly improves its GEO system for #drone flights near airports & severs ties w/@AirMapIO, the leading proponent of a chaotic, unsafe (but profitable) "patchwork" of state/local drone laws. Will use @PrecisionHawk geospatial data now. bit.ly/2SdMg4Z
.@ACLU Opposition to S. 2836 โ "The Preventing Emerging Threats Act of 2018: Countering Malicious #Drones" aclu.org/letter/aclu-oppositโฆ
Oops! Corrected link to the @theNASEM's report: nap.edu/read/25143/chapter/1
xitter.gq/TheDroneGuy/status/100โฆ
FAAโs Safety Rules for Commercial #Drones Are Overly Strict, [a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine] Report Says โoutline.com/9a4fLb @theNASEM @WSJ






