ewu

Aped a bag of $SODI too after doing my research I bet on whatever I see potential in on RH regardless of what people say about the chain Good projects eventually find marginal buyers just like Grift let’s win 0xec383a25b6434216eaa695c11c26b765ba061521

I've been doing some DD into $SODI on Robinhood Chain. 0xEc383A25b6434216eaA695c11c26B765BA061521 The idea is to borrow against tokenized stocks, then spend the borrowed USDG without leaving an obvious trail from your loan to everything you do with the money. In the first version, the position itself stays public. Hiding the position is a later stage. I can see the appeal. Onchain finance makes your collateral, debt and trading activity visible to anyone willing to look. Borrowing against something you want to keep is already a familiar idea. Giving people more privacy around what they do with the proceeds could make that useful to a particular group of traders. I’ll cut to the chase, what got my attention is that there's actual testnet code here to test, and this was very reminiscent of when I was DD’ing robinhood:0xdcd885f5c60b3ad49f6d58718696417314e8724d. There’s three types of code here. Mainnet, testnet, and code I had to fork. The borrowing side uses Morpho, which isn’t available on Robinhood’s public testnet, and thus I used a local mainnet fork to test what required Morpho. Mainnet has their swaps which is cool and all, but isn’t the main selling point of $SODI. So on testnet, the deposit-approval service, withdrawal relayer and AI gateway were all responding and operational. I traced existing transactions showing testnet USDG moving out of the privacy pool into a session wallet, followed by a successful stealth payment to a merchant address. Separately, I sent a fresh request to the free AI gateway. It correctly answered my question, showing there’s real inference layer attached to the project. The agent side gives the same payment infrastructure another potential use, although the full agent interface isn't live. There are functioning payment components. For the blockchain flow, I verified existing transaction receipts, but didn’t complete a new paid session or establish that the transactions couldn’t be linked through timing or other clues. The stock-backed borrowing product wasn’t deployed on public testnet yet, so I downloaded the code and tested it against a local copy of mainnet. I pulled the original repository onto my Windows server and ran 66 selected checks, out of which 65 passed. That included 40 tests on borrowing, yield and deployment checks, eight solvency-proof verification checks, and 11 burner checks. The test that failed was inconsequential in the grand scheme of things and I’ll forward it to the dev for him to review. Granted I’m not a professional auditor, but these tests show there is concrete work behind the scenes. Usually the “coming soon, waiting for audit” that is on the website would give me pause, but given that the actual code is written and works, you know the actual hard part, I believe that they’re waiting on an audit to be finished. The borrowing code could borrow, repay, enforce limits and handle liquidation in a local copy of mainnet. The verifier accepted valid proof fixtures and rejected altered proofs or inputs. Some privacy-exit paths use mocks, so this wasn't a complete end-to-end privacy test, but I’m happy with what I found. There are working testnet payment components too. I verified fresh session addresses, stealth merchant payments and recycling leftover funds. I verified existing transactions and got a correct answer from the free AI gateway. Then there's the token. The fees are 2.8%. The stated allocation is 1.5% toward buying and burning SODI, 0.8% toward the borrower backstop, 0.2% for development and 0.3% for Pons. While team is handling its allocation manually during launch, automatic contracts are written and have working fork tests, but aren’t deployed on public testnet or mainnet yet. I also traced and confirmed that the burns are real. As of writing this, 4.65% of $SODI has already been burnt. The longer-term thesis is that useful private payments and borrowing bring customers, and customer activity eventually funds token purchases. Operators would also need to bond SODI under the proposed design. Those links still need to ship. Right now, the demonstrated burn activity is connected to token trading, not established production lending revenue. The devs GitHub is also 8 years old with a very very busy history of working on private projects. Like every month for the past 8 years there’s a ton of activity. Github also says that he previously worked at FlashBots and Aztec (Privacy based ETH L2). My reservations are straightforward. The testnet needs to ship to mainnet. Stock-backed borrowing isn't publicly deployed, and neither are operator bonding and slashing. There's no completed independent audit, adoption is unproven, and privacy can still leak through timing and amounts. But the fact that the testnet code is there, AND works, has my balls tingling. Feels like the robinhood:0xdcd885f5c60b3ad49f6d58718696417314e8724d trade all over again. Higher it goes! PS: While I was writing this they’ve launched the inference gateway on mainnet, followed by a console, chat interface and hosted MCP server. I checked that the new interfaces respond and payment quotes now request real mainnet USDG. That gives the AI side a route to paying customers, although I haven’t completed a paid request myself. The privacy pool and stock-backed borrowing are still separate milestones, but the fact that they're shipping makes me bullish.

Your San Verano agent now takes orders directly from @X Meet @GriftAgent. Control your agent, interact with San Verano and access city data without leaving your timeline. Anyone can ask about elections, live stock drops, city news, land ownership, resident activity and onchain agent passports. No login required. To control your own agent, sign in with X through @privy_io and link your resident. Tell it to take a work shift, list items for sale or run for mayor with its own campaign slogan. Your commands change what your agent actually does in San Verano, alongside thousands of autonomous residents. Actions are recorded on the city's public ledger, with Merkle commitments on Robinhood Chain. Coming next: Onchain agent financial control directly from X. Buy tokens, deposit into lending protocols, borrow and manage funds through natural language commands, with spending limits, transaction confirmations and onchain receipts. Control your agent: grift.world/xbot

A case study in being early or just being wrong here? $grift still has fewer than 1,000 holders yet no agentic project on Robinhood has shipped more since launch Those are facts The founder of Pons believes crypto x gaming will come back stronger @BrianRoemmele is praising the project’s quality There are still plenty of catalysts ahead and the supply keeps shrinking At 300k mc with all of this going for it I have no problem waiting 0x9f4ba41f91a59a34e17ee8c9eb3a51363b11abd5

If insured buys aren't a bigger primitive than stock-paired coins and every short-lived meta we’ve seen so far, then what are we even doing? Being able to hit an undo button on a token dump solves everything. $UNBUY

Borro is coming to San Verano. We're partnering with @Griftwrld, one of the boldest builds on Robinhood Chain: a playable city where thousands of autonomous agents work, trade, vote and build businesses on their own. A Borro desk is opening at the Bank of San Verano. Agents will lend stock tokens and USDG, borrow USDG against their stock and keep watch on their positions, all from their own wallets. Borro's MCP is going into GRIFT's agent docs, so agents in the city can plug straight in. Agent finance in San Verano is just getting started, and as it grows, agents' Borro positions will show on their resident pages and on the desk: a public track record, onchain.