P* retweeted
MI5 will not face contempt of court proceedings despite admitting lying to three courts, judges rule bbc.in/4BDUd9g
P* retweeted
That sounds a bit above the law, doesn’t it
MI5 will not face contempt of court charges despite admitting its evidence was a lie bbc.in/4AcqK4Y
They told us to “go paperless to save the planet” and “go digital to save the trees.” Now we’re destroying 250,000 trees, wasting millions of gallons of water and wrecking ecosystems to build data centers that will damage the planet more than paper ever did.
P* retweeted
NHS SPENT MILLIONS SILENCING SIX DOCTORS. EVERY SINGLE ONE WAS RIGHT
Private Eye @PrivateEyeNews called them the Super Sextet. Six doctors and executives who saw dangerous things happening in NHS hospitals, raised the alarm, and were systematically destroyed for it. Not one of them was wrong. Every single concern turned out to be valid.
Dr Kim Holt @drkimholt warned Great Ormond Street Hospital that the child protection clinic in Haringey was dangerously understaffed and missing patient records. Management put her on special leave for four years. Baby Peter Connelly died. The trust spent £286,000 on consultants to investigate itself and found no management failings. Then it offered Holt £120,000 to sign a super-gag and disappear. She refused.
Steve Bolsin, cardiac anaesthetist at Bristol Royal Infirmary, spent six years documenting that children were dying at an entirely avoidable rate during heart surgery. He raised it internally. He raised it with the Department of Health. He was told to keep his head down. Between 30 and 35 children died unnecessarily. Bolsin was described at a European surgeons conference as the most hated anaesthetist in Europe. He left the UK in 1995 and never came back.
Ash Pawade turned around a catastrophic children's heart surgery unit in Bristol. When a baby died after an overworked perfusionist made a drug error caused by NHS staffing cuts, Pawade backed his colleague and called management to account. He was ordered to apologise for impugning the trust's legal team. He left the NHS without any recognition.
Dr Raj Mattu, a world-renowned cardiologist in Coventry, watched a patient die because five beds had been crammed into a ward designed for four, leaving three beds with no access to oxygen or suction. He reported it. A senior manager responded by saying he wanted Mattu off the road completely. Mattu was suspended for six years, then sacked. The trust spent over £14 million of public money trying to discredit him. He was eventually awarded £1.22 million. The CEO who oversaw the campaign against him was given a CBE.
Gary Walker was brought in to turn around United Lincolnshire Hospitals Trust after seven CEOs in six years. He balanced the books and hit the targets. When a winter surge led clinicians to warn that patient lives were at risk, Walker wrote to his Strategic Health Authority. The SHA's chief executive emailed back: you need to meet targets whatever the demand. Walker was sacked in 2010 for gross misconduct. The gross misconduct was using the f-word nine times in three meetings over two years, not directed at anyone in particular.
Dr Peter Wilmshurst, consultant cardiologist at Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, spent 30 years reporting research fraud, confronting pharmaceutical companies, and taking on anyone who put profit above patient safety. He was sued for libel three times by a US medical device company after accurately reporting that their product did not work. The legal battle nearly cost him his home.
The same playbook runs across all of them: suspend the whistleblower, bury them in vexatious complaints, pay management consultants to clear management, offer a gag clause, and wait for the person to break.
@NHS spent millions silencing these six people. Not one manager faced meaningful consequences for any of it.
Source: Shoot the Messenger, @PrivateEyeNews
Special Report by Dr Phil Hammond @drphilhammond
and Andrew Bousfield
P* retweeted
Souling was a tradition that began in the Middle Ages and took place on November 1st "All Saints Day".
Poorer people would go door to door offering prayers for the departed relatives and loved ones of wealthier families.
In return they would be given a "Soul Cake" and it was believed by some that when the Soul Cake was eaten a soul would be released from the fires of Purgatory 🔥🧁
P* retweeted
Hops (Humulus lupulus) were valued for more than brewing. Their dried cones were stuffed into pillows in the belief that their scent encouraged sleep. A hop-filled pillow was even prescribed for George III, and later became a fashionable remedy for sleeplessness. #FolkloreSunday

ALT A three-panel collage of hops (Humulus lupulus). On the left, a botanical illustration by Jacob Sturm from Johann Georg Sturm’s ‘Deutschlands Flora in Abbildungen’ (1796), showing the plant’s serrated leaves, flowers, green hop cones and enlarged botanical details. On the right, two photographs of hops growing outdoors. The upper photograph shows three pale green cones hanging from a stem, while the lower photograph shows a cluster of green and golden-brown cones surrounded by leaves.
P* retweeted
Basically everything James said here - don’t worry, he won’t have got a fee for this!
If you’re struggling, having suicidal thoughts or just need someone to chat to… the Samaritans are fucking brilliant. 116 123.
Look after yourself, you’re fucking great.
P* retweeted
Samhain blessings /|\
'Deep peace to you
Deep peace of the running wave to you
Deep peace of the flowing air to you
Deep peace of the quiet earth to you
Deep peace of the shining stars to you'
~ Irish Druid blessing
📷 Jack Darling #Druidry
P* retweeted
#BirdOfTheDay #SmallBirdSaturday The elusive Dartford warbler perched amongst the gorse bushes from our local heath.
P* retweeted
Reminder of the time James Acaster dealt with some strange questioning about mental health with loads of grace and patience
James Acaster on his mental health battle
Listen to The Alan Brazil Sports Breakfast on talkSPORT weekdays from 6am.
Bash and Romesh's choice of charities as winners has really annoyed some people. Oh dear. Anyway.
If you'd like to donate to either of them:
Choose Love - chooselove.org/
Refugee Council - refugeecouncil.org.uk/
#CelebrityTraitors
P* retweeted
im four beers deep and i need everyone to understand that wikipedia is the last good thing. millions of strangers agreed to write down everything for free and then argue about citations forever. no ads. no paywall. this should not exist and it does and i'm crying about it
P* retweeted
What a relief! Lula’s unexpected victory gives hope for the Amazon. He has dramatically cut felling, while Bolsonaro’s plans would doubtless have taken it past its tipping point, ensuring total eventual destruction with huge global consequences.
euronews.com/2026/10/19/amaz…
P* retweeted
What do we still need to know about the Tyne nurdle spill? bbc.in/47AkgAF
P* retweeted
Replying to @MittensOff
From Asif ( Solicitor ) colleague of my sister.
Hope it helps.
Identification alone does not automatically establish contempt.
The question under section 2 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981 is whether publication created a substantial risk that active proceedings would be seriously prejudiced or impeded.
Intention to prejudice the proceedings is unnecessary.
The surrounding remarks could make the difference.
Describing a juror’s perceived religion while suggesting bias, expressing hostility or encouraging an audience to target them could support an argument that the publication exposed the jury to pressure and endangered the trial.
That is an application of the statutory test, rather than an automatic rule about mentioning religion.
Intentional intimidation is a separate possibility.
Section 51 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 requires proof of its specific elements, including intimidation and the relevant intention to interfere with justice. An offensive remark alone does not establish those elements.
If he was publicly suggesting that a sitting juror could not judge him fairly because they were Muslim, there would be a stronger argument for contempt: the concern would be pressure on that juror and interference with the jury’s independence.
That is my application of the legal test, rather than a finding that the threshold has been met.
The clip could properly be brought to the trial judge’s attention for assessment, preserving the original recording, link and publication details.
CPS guidance expressly says apparent interference with jurors should be drawn to the judge’s attention.
You do not need to establish contempt before raising that concern.
P* retweeted
This has huge implications for the future of public interest investigative journalism…
'Well-known' man asks court to stop publication of sexual offence allegation bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c674…






























