Shitposter!! Ambassador: @trylimitless & @duel_duck
Rugged
Joined February 2024
- Tweets32.6K
- Following1.6K
- Followers1.7K
- Likes67.6K
Took a position on Man City at RB Leipzig tonight
Market has City at 64¢
I think they're underpriced:
head-to-head is 4 wins for City, 1 draw, 1 for Leipzig, and City sit 12th in the table while Leipzig are down at 27th
Entry: $6.60 at 1.56x
Did it on @trylimitless
limitless.exchange/share/c35…
One thing that gets tricky when building onchain apps:
The application may need the data to do its job, but that doesn't mean everyone else should be able to see it
Think API credentials, private inputs, user-specific information or business logic
Making something verifiable shouldn't mean making every detail public
That's an interesting part of what @RialoHQ is exploring with confidential execution
The goal isn't just to run code onchain
It's to make the result verifiable while keeping sensitive information protected
Feels like an important piece if we want onchain apps to handle more than simple transactions
Not your usual matchday duels
Created two interesting duels on @duel_duck tonight for Atlanta vs Parma and Newcastle United vs Everton
⚽ Newcastle vs Everton — a tight game where even stoppage time could make things interesting
🟥 Atlanta vs Parma — will the referee reach for a red card?
The duels:
⏱️ Will Newcastle vs Everton have 6+ minutes of added time in the first half?
🟥 Will any player receive a red card during Atlanta vs Parma?
Two unique questions, two sides to pick
What's your take?
Pick a side and let's duel on DuelDuck!
duelduck.com/share-duel/will…
Processing 1,000 transactions at once sounds impressive
But what if 100 of them are trying to update the same account?
That's where things get interesting
Parallel execution can make a blockchain faster, but handling conflicts without messing up the final state is a whole different challenge
This is something I find interesting about @RialoHQ
It's not just about running transactions in parallel. It's also about making sure they produce the right result
Because speed means very little if correctness gets lost along the way
Found an easy looking duel on @duel_duck that I had to share with you guys
DuelDuck launching its token on pump .fun before Nov 3?
I’m leaning heavily towards NO
The deadline is right around the corner, and unless something unexpected happens, NO looks like the obvious pick to me
Would you take NO or bet against my take?
Jump into the duel on DuelDuck and let’s settle it with more than just opinions👇
duelduck.com/share-duel/will…
Jebinraj retweeted
Predarc is live on Base Mainnet @base 🟦
Onchain forecasting and agents - choose Higher/Lower on live crypto markets, create Community Markets, run bounded AI Agents and use verifiable Agent Research.
Also live: points, claims, receipts, bridges and swaps.
predarc.xyz
🤝 Paid partnership
Matchday in Serie A!
Como 🆚 Venezia
Como will want to make home advantage count, but Venezia won't show up just to watch
Could be an interesting one
I've created a duel on @duel_duck
Instead of arguing in the comments about who's taking the W, put your prediction on the line and let's settle it on Duel Duck
Who's backing who? 👇
duelduck.com/share-duel/will…
A smart contract can be perfectly written and still be part of a pretty dumb application
Why? Because real applications deal with things that happen later
They wait for data, react to changes, handle failures and decide what to do next
That’s the part of @RialoHQ I find interesting
Not just writing code that executes when called, but building systems that can respond when the situation changes
Feels like an important step for onchain apps
PSG are at the top
Le Havre are at the bottom
On paper, this should be an easy night for PSG
But Le Havre have home advantage today… could they pull off a surprise?
I've created a duel on @duel_duck
Will PSG dominate or can Le Havre flip the script?
Jump in, pick your side, and let's settle this on the pitch!
duelduck.com/share-duel/will…
Jebinraj retweeted
HOW SAFE IS YOUR CRYPTO CARD, REALLY?
Even giants like Binance can face security incidents. No brand is automatically safe.
So I reviewed 40+ crypto cards based on one question:
Who controls your funds if the provider gets hacked?
S-TIER: SELF-CUSTODY FIRST
@wirex_one
Wirex One is built around self-custody, with users controlling their wallet keys. Card payments involve settlement and conversion flows, so payment-processing risks remain.
@ether_fi
Built around self-custody. Check how the specific card mode handles spending and any connected protocols.
@Avici
Self-custody with card spending supported by smart-contract escrow. Contract and integration risks remain.
@EthenaPay
Designed so the provider doesn't custody your wallet assets. You remain responsible for your keys and device security.
@oobit
Supports spending from self-custody wallets. Check the funding flow to confirm whether assets ever move into a custodial balance.
@Plasma
Self-custody-oriented wallet/card setup. Smart-contract and payment-provider risks still apply.
WHAT REALLY MATTERS
With self-custody, you control your wallet instead of relying on a company to hold your entire balance.
With custodial cards, you're relying on the provider's security, solvency and withdrawal controls. Hybrid setups depend on where your funds sit at each stage.
A-TIER: ESTABLISHED CUSTODIAL OR HYBRID SETUPS
@KASTxyz
Custodial card balance. Your funds depend on the provider and its financial partners.
@Krak
Exchange-linked financial services. Risk depends on the product and institution holding the balance.
@TradeRepublic
Eligible cash may receive statutory protection, subject to local rules. Crypto assets are different.
@Wise
Regulated payment service, not a self-custody crypto wallet. Safeguarding rules depend on the product and jurisdiction.
@RedotPay
Custodial prepaid-card model. You rely on the provider and its partners for access to funds.
@trustee_io
Check where funds are held and whether any deposit protection applies.
B-TIER / GOOD
@PulsarMoneyApp
Not a custodian or card issuer. Card services rely on third-party partners.
@xplaceapp
Non-custodial. Users retain control of their assets, with card payments settled through Visa.
@AgoraCards
Self-custody until funds are loaded onto the card. Card balances are held by licensed partners.
@solcard
Says it doesn't hold user funds. Card accounts are managed by licensed third-party institutions.
@xhypeofficial
Self-custody wallet with exportable private keys. Prepaid card funds are held by the card issuer.
@JupiterExchange
Uses partner infrastructure, but the exact card custody model isn't clearly disclosed.
@KoloHub
Insufficient official information to confirm who holds card funds.
@AnodosFinance
Non-custodial. Says it never holds or controls user funds; card services rely on licensed partners.
@SolidYield
Non-custodial wallet with user-controlled keys. Card infrastructure is provided through Wirex.
@falconfinance
Uses institutional custody partners, including Fireblocks and Ceffu, with MPC-based custody.
@0xinfini
Describes some wallet services as non-custodial, but card custody depends on third-party providers.
THE RULE I FOLLOW
Don't keep your savings on your spending card.
Keep only what you need for everyday payments. Store long-term holdings separately, understand the custody model, and test withdrawals before moving larger amounts.
This is a preliminary custody-risk ranking, not a security audit.
Which card do you trust most with your funds?
Warning to every Slash user!
Slash either has the worst compliance team across all Neobanks out there, or half their business model comes from catering to bad actors.
Now it's catching up to them.
Meta just banned all Slash Credit Bins and deactivated ad dashboards associated with Slash. If not resolved, it could result in $1B in annual transaction volume loss. Slash CEO claims they cover 2% of total Meta ad spend.
Reasons are unclear why they’re banned, but rumors suggest a fraud scheme using Slash cards to run chargebacks on Meta, making them lose significant dollars.
Earlier this year, I uncovered a No-KYC card linked to Slash, and today I've found some really concerning messages from Slash employees enticing gray hat/black hats to join their platform with strong promises.
In just 1 group, an employee sent 60 replies telling rejected applicants to DM with a few other worrying messages. They've even promised to "never freeze / lock your account especially if you’re in the e-commerce business"
I've attached some proof, but I'm going to do a lot more research into this.
Anyone here affected by Slash or willing to provide me with tips regarding the situation? Maybe I'm being too harsh on them, but there's a lot to worry about.
Something's cooking at @duel_duck
The 2nd livestream is happening TODAY at 17:00 UTC, and we're getting a new announcement and a little giveaway 🎁
A new announcement, some community vibes, and maybe a surprise or two? 👀
Clear your Friday evening
Who's pulling up? 👇
Another solid day at @RialoHQ Builders Hub last night
400+ listeners tuned in to see builders bring ideas to life!
⚡ VELORA showcased reactive DeFi vaults with guarded automation and live Sepolia testnet flows
🎮 Rialoverse introduced a unified Web3 hub featuring AI companion COMI, on-chain gaming, and more
Two projects, fresh ideas, and builders pushing Rialo forward
The ecosystem keeps growing!
Another week another amazing @RialoHQ Builder Hub 🦈
Always exciting to see builders come together to share their projects, exchange ideas and support each other’s progress
Big thanks to everyone who showcased their work and everyone who joined to make the session special. Every week brings new ideas fresh energy and more reasons to be excited about what’s being built across the Rialo ecosystem
The community keeps growing and the builders keep building. 👀
Inter are flying right now
Venezia have a tough challenge ahead
Inter come in after 7 wins in their last 8 league games, while Venezia are looking to bounce back after a defeat to Genoa
But football always has room for surprises
I've created a duel on @duel_duck
Will Venezia vs Inter Milan end in a DRAW?
What's your call? Let's settle it on Duel Duck!
duelduck.com/share-duel/will…
Most blockchains are good at changing state
The interesting part is deciding when that change should trigger something else
A price reaches a threshold
An API returns new data
A condition finally becomes true
What happens next?
With @RialoHQ , reactive transactions bring that logic closer to the execution layer, so applications can respond to conditions without relying on an external bot to trigger every step
That’s a meaningful shift in how we build onchain systems
Not just executing transactions.
Building applications that react
