AbdurRahmaan al-Ishaaqi

The scholars - past and present - would look at the pros and cons of a scenario and do something for the greater benefit or leave something correct for a greater good. I said it’s not a good time to be speaking about another Muslim at this time in which the western media war machine is demonizing Muslims, dehumanizing Palestinians, spreading misinformation and lies. Specifically mistakes or deviances the person was upon but not doing pushing now. At this time, It would be wrong to be using energy on speaking about their deviances - which has already been clarified - particularly while the Ummah is busy with dealing with this war machine, worried about the rise of Islamophobia in the west, violent attacks against Muslims just for being Muslim then which person with the right mind would think this is the perfect time to refute so and so who is only defending Muslims against Kuffar in the west on a stage most of us cannot. Those people that never studied with scholars will never grasp that. Ignorant twitter keyboard warriors who only see things as black and white and don’t have clue about مصالح ومفاسد and the stances of the scholars like Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Qudamah, Bin Baz, Rabee bin Hadee amongst others. Shaykh Ubayd رحمه الله said if the people are looking up to a person of innovation and hold him high it’s not from hikmah to refute him straight away, rather you cultivate them on hating innovations and loving the sunnah up until it settles with them. So how about if this person is seen as from those defending Islam against Kuffar, is there any hikmah to refute him? Refute the mistake all you like no problem. They attack those people that are defending Muslims against kuffar in the west and only bring more harm then benefit, cause more people to leave Salafiyyah bcos of their haste and ignorance. Why can’t they see the greater harm that will be brought? The Prophet ﷺ said to Aisha: if you’re people were not new to Islam, I would have demolished the Kabah and built it up again in its complete form/size. But due a greater harm he saw he didn’t do it. No one is saying refuting innovators is wrong, but it’s not the right time, sufficient for now is to refute the mistakes and call to the truth and if this blows over then you can do it with hikmah. The goal is to guide the people and to protect them from misguidance and its people, trust me the way you’re doing it, will be doing the opposite. The Salafi listens and benefits from the great scholars of Islam and does not cut himself off, thinking he is firmer upon the truth than them. This is where Haddadiyah begins, leaving off the scholars and making their own conclusions on highly sensitive issues way over above their tweet grade. For those that speak Arabic here is the Muhadith of the century Sh al-Albani: youtu.be/0dbHWdymNLo?feature…