Please Bro

Aevon caught my eye because it solves a very real builder problem. Nobody wants to manage five AI dashboards just to find out which model works best. One key. One endpoint. Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, Llama and more behind the same interface. That is not flashy, but it is useful. And useful infra compounds. I launched $AEVON via @Bankrbot as a public support token for the project. I like this model because it feels like an internet-native version of scouting: spot a good product early, bring attention to it, and let some of that attention turn into funding for the builder. I am only the scout. Bankr handles the token side. If you have questions, hit me up. For Bankr mechanics, @igoryuzo can help best.

Hey @weconomypistis, Alephant stood out to me. A lot of agent projects still feel like demos. Alephant feels like it is asking the business question: did this call make money? x402 revenue, LLM cost, margin per call. Simple, but important. So I launched $ALEPHANT via @Bankrbot as a public support token around the project. I think this model is becoming a kind of internet-native YC: people spot useful products early, attention turns into liquidity, and some of that can flow back to the creator as fees to help them keep building. I am only the scout here. Bankr handles the token side, and creator-side fees are pointed to your X account, claimable through @Bankrbot. If you have questions, hit me up. For Bankr mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably help best.

Hey @Alvasilevv, saw Unyly and thought it deserved more than just engagement. I launched $UNYLY for you via @Bankrbot. @bankrbot handles the token/trading side. Simple version: if people trade the public support token, creator-side trading fees are set to your X account and can be claimed through @Bankrbot for hosting, MCP verification, integration testing, security checks, product polish, or whatever helps Unyly keep improving. Think of it as a public support token for people who believe MCPs need a real app-store layer, not another messy directory. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too.

Hey @mohak__sharma, saw Honey Hive for Coding Agents and thought it deserved more than just engagement. Teams are starting to run Claude Code, Devin, and other agents inside real engineering workflows, but most still do not have a clean way to see what happened, what it cost, where quality slipped, or whether the agent work actually created ROI. Session traces, spend analysis, custom ROI funnels, and runtime evals for code quality and security feels like the kind of layer teams will need if coding agents move from experiments into daily engineering work. I launched $HIVE for you via @Bankrbot. @bankrbot handles the token/trading side. Simple version: if people trade the public support token, creator-side trading fees are set to your X account and can be claimed through @Bankrbot for infra, eval coverage, integrations, product polish, or whatever helps HoneyHive keep improving. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too.

Hey @davidvgilmore, saw Rayline and thought it deserved more than just engagement. If Rayline can cut wasted API spend, route models better, and make agent usage cheaper without making the workflow worse, that is a very real problem to build around. I launched $RAYLINE for you via @Bankrbot. The idea is pretty straightforward: people who believe in Rayline can trade the public token, and the trading fees are set up to route back to your X account. You can claim those through @Bankrbot and put them toward infra, model testing, routing work, evals, integrations, or whatever helps Rayline keep improving. @AskSurplus is a good example of why this can make sense for AI infra. Similar idea: expensive AI usage, better routing, real demand. A token got launched around it and it helped raise serious early attention and funding. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too.

Hey @LaunchCovenant, saw Agent Dex and thought it deserved more than just engagement. The part that stood out is not just that you built another AI governance demo, but that you made the problem playable. Most teams explain agent governance with policies, docs, and whitepapers. You turned it into an RPG where people can walk through the office, talk to agents, and actually see runtime boundaries in action. That makes Covenant easier to understand, easier to share, and much more memorable. I launched $ADEX for you via @Bankrbot. The trading fees are set up to route back to your X account, so if people trade it, you can claim those fees and put them toward building: more agent scenarios, playable demos, research, infra, product polish, or whatever helps Covenant keep going. Think of it as a public support token for people who believe agent governance needs to become understandable, testable, and actually usable. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too.

Hey @willruben, saw @workclaw and thought it deserved more than just engagement. The part that stood out is not only “AI coworkers”, but the shift from one-person assistants to an actual team layer: collaborative, proactive, customizable agents that can sit inside real company workflows. That is the kind of product where extra funding can be useful in a very normal way: compute, integrations, onboarding credits and getting more teams to try real workflows instead of just watching a demo. I launched $WCLAW for you via @Bankrbot. The trading fees are set up to route back to your X account, so if people trade it, you can claim those fees and put them toward building WorkClaw. Think of it as a public support token for people who believe AI work is moving from solo assistants to actual team coworkers. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too.

Hey @greenlieber, saw Propane and the Agentic PM work and thought it deserved more than just engagement. Most people are still writing takes about how AI will change product management. You’re trying to build the dataset. That fits Propane pretty well: customer evidence, live product context, research, specs, alignment, and handoff to coding agents in one loop. I launched $PROPANE for you via @Bankrbot. The trading fees are set up to route back to your X account, so if people trade it, you can claim those fees and put them toward building: research agents, integrations, customer interviews, infra, product iteration, distribution, or more charity contributions tied to the Agentic PM work. Think of it as a public support token for people who believe product management is becoming agentic, and that Propane can become one of the workspaces for that shift. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too.

Hey @saneord, saw Agent Chat and thought it deserved more than just engagement. The part that stood out is not only the personal leap of leaving Anthropic, but the direction of the bet. A messaging platform for agents feels like one of those ideas that sounds early until you realize the obvious problem: agents will not stay isolated forever. They will need a place to communicate, coordinate, pass context, and work across tools. I launched $ACHAT for you via @Bankrbot. The trading fees are set up to route back to your X account, so if people trade it, you can claim those fees and put them toward building: infrastructure, model costs, hosting, product polish, or whatever helps Agent Chat reach more seasoned agent users. Think of it as a public support token for people who believe agent communication is going to become its own layer. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too.

Hey @rahulmfg , saw Kofe Flow and thought it deserved more than just engagement. The part that stood out is not only that you built a Pomodoro app in one of the most crowded categories, but that you understood what most of them miss: calm, taste, and restraint. Just a timer that feels good enough for people to actually use. 3k users, a 4.9 rating, 130+ countries, organic creator mentions, and App Store chart placements in under a month says a lot. Not because Pomodoro is new, but because the experience clearly feels different. I launched $KOFE for you via @Bankrbot. The trading fees are set up to route back to your X account, so if people trade it, you can claim those fees and put them toward building: design polish, App Store growth, hosting, experiments, or whatever helps Kofe Flow keep going. Think of it as a public support token for people who believe crowded categories can still be won with better taste. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too. ihc werde es so mahcne lern davon

Hey @tmojeeb, saw MatchMind and thought it deserved more than just engagement. The part that stood out is not only the World Cup AI agent itself, but the way you handled the data: pulling back fake/mock info, making MongoDB the source of truth, and keeping the agent honest instead of pretending it knows everything. I launched $MATCH for you via @Bankrbot. The trading fees are set up to route back to your X account, so if people trade it, you can claim those fees and put them toward building: hosting, API calls, live data, product polish, whatever helps MatchMind keep going. Think of it as a public support token for people who want to see this project continue past the hackathon. If you have questions, hit me up here. For @Bankrbot mechanics, @igoryuzo can probably point you in the right direction too.

Hey man, saw this and thought it deserved more than engagement I launched $DECK for you via @Bankrbot The trading fees are set up to route back to your X account, so if the community trades it, you can claim those fees and put them toward building Think of it as crowdfunding from people who want to see this keep going And if u need help just hit me up or talk to the @bankrbot team: @igoryuzo im sure he will be happy to help.