Alan Mitchell retweeted
One Nation Vic leader Warren Pickering roasted on Today after standing by his Ashwood candidate Steven Mitchell who platforms “whack jobs” that spread lies about the Port Arthur massacre.
Pickering says he will “defend” his cooker candidates through thick & thin.🙄 #auspol
Alan Mitchell retweeted
Hanson excuses corporate mismanagement to score cheap political points. This is Trumpism!
David Jones, a beloved Australian icon and the world’s oldest department store, has entered administration after 188 years, putting 6,000 jobs at risk.
Another Australian business buckling. More workers paying the price for Jim Chalmers’ budget and the Albanese Labor government’s economic mismanagement.
Alan Mitchell retweeted
Outraged by the election of Abdul El-Sayed, former Trump attorney Jenna Ellis wants to amend the Constitution to strip voters of the power to elect US senators because "the people can be stupid." peoplefor.org/rightwingwatch…
Alan Mitchell retweeted
The Navy Admiral who Pete Hegseth fired, Nancy Lacore, a 35-year Navy veteran, last night defeated her MAGA republican opponent to win a House seat - South Carolina District 1. Now he has to answer to her in Congress
Alan Mitchell retweeted
Jillian Segal’s ever-expanding agenda and the cancellation of a memorial to Gaza’s children raise a key question: who decides what Australians are allowed to say, protest against and commemorate?
Alan Mitchell retweeted
"The most crushing and terrifying result of the evening." 😱
Nothing rattles the racist Sky After Dark crowd quite like actual democracy, especially if a Muslim is elected.
Sharri Markson suffers from a bad case of Islamophobia, desperately spreading Trump’s unproven lies.
Alan Mitchell retweeted
BREAKING: Oil prices fall by over 8% as Iran war is blamed for Republican defeats at US mid-terms
Alan Mitchell retweeted
Two state solution? The cognitive state and the delusional one. But which is which? Exhibit A below.
🇺🇸🇮🇱 WARNING!!! US Media is Setting up the "Israel Did It!" or "Israel Made the US Do It!" Narrative Regarding Attacks (including NUCLEAR attacks) on Iran
Tucker Carlson, who has played cognitive infiltrator/manipulator like his US government-employed father before him, claims "Israel" is pressuring the US to nuke Iran and is sharing intel with the US on Iran.
This is a dangerous means of trying to distance/absolve the US of its own crimes worldwide and fits into STATED US policy regarding shifting blame for US wars of aggression against Iran specifically.
"Israel did it" or "Israel made us do it!"
Here is reality:
1. Israel depends 100% on the US to exist day to day, and to conduct any major military operation. If the US stopped supporting Israel, it would cease to exist. Conversely, the US has pursued empire and war worldwide before Israel ever existed and will continue to so even if Israel disappeared tomorrow;
2. Israel depends on US intel capabilities ONLY the US has, not the other way around. Israeli intel - like Ukraine's - is an extension of US capabilities;
3. Israeli lobbying in Washington accounts for less than 1% of all US lobbying, used to launder political blame in the same way Israeli armed aggression does so militarily - it does not have the ability to pressure or manipulate the US into doing anything anymore than one's hand can pressure or direct the actions of one's mind and body;
4. Carlson mentioned Israel's meaningless elections as a "factor" - no, no matter who won, just like in US elections, nothing would change, least of all Israel's role as America's forward operating base in the region (just as it hasn't changed this entire 21st century);
5. US policy papers have explicitly laid out strategies to use Israel to both provoke and take the blame/retaliation for AMERICAN war on Iran. The 2009 Brookings paper "Which Path to Persia" has a whole chapter dedicated to this strategy!
6. If the US attacks or nukes Iran or anyone else - it's because the US wanted to and it will use all its proxies to either help and/or take the blame - do NOT fall for the propaganda used to facilitate this STATED strategy!
7. And no, just because the US is 100% responsible for its actions AND the actions of its proxies, it does not absolve any of its proxies - including Israel - for their roles in US crimes against humanity.
If a man uses his hand to commit a crime, his whole body, including his hand, goes to jail for it.
Finally - whether Carlson is doing this to deliberately assist with stated US policy for shifting blame for its own global crimes against humanity, or he is doing this out of pure incompetence and/or ignorance - the outcome is exactly the same - misleading his huge audience and selling them a lie US policymakers themselves have admitted they are telling the public.
Alan Mitchell retweeted
🚨Mississippi U.S. Senate🚨
🔵 Scott Colom - 48.9%
🔴 Cindy Hyde-Smith (Inc) - 48.9%
(Colom leads by 425 votes)
99% of expected votes in
Alan Mitchell retweeted
The 188-year-old retailer has entered voluntary administration after failing to reach a deal with landlords. afr.com/companies/retail/dav…
Alan Mitchell retweeted
The Public Inquiry into AUKUS has released its findings!
Find what you need to know here: aukuspublicinquiry.com
Join the call for a Royal Commission into AUKUS: nb.australiainstitute.org.au…
Alan Mitchell retweeted
According to @piersmorgan, @jamesmatthewsky is one of the UK’s finest journalists. Hilarious stuff out of the gob of Morgan as per usual
Alan Mitchell retweeted
Morning Twitterverse 👋
Quick question.
By whose moral code was this ever right?
The judge said the rapist showed NO REMORSE!
#RememberThisNovember
Alan Mitchell retweeted
Thank you @politico for publishing details of this report to an American audience. It's not a report of the Australian government but of responsible citizens who conducted the formal public Inquiry our Government refused to. Hence, it is as 'official' a statement of the views of the Australian public as you can get.
#uspol #ENDAUKUS #AUKUSPublicInquiry #illegalwars #auspol #nopopularsupport
Unofficial AUKUS inquiry recommends tearing up the 'worst' defence decision the country has ever made politi.co/3UAHJPe
Alan Mitchell retweeted
Good analysis
The CIA has never worked for the President. It wasn't created to work for the president. It was a continuation of an international syndicate that walked the world into WW2 in order to create international governmental entities to implement one world government. Prior to WW2, they had to pay their own intel assets and paramilitary to overthrow foreign governments and install patsy dictators.
WW2 changed everything for them. They had the UN, IMF, World Bank, every country set up intel agencies and standing militaries paid for by taxing the citizens relieving them of the expense. The CIA set out to overthrow every head of state that declared neutrality or opposition to the US's control or were declared neutral in the choice between USSR and US/NATO. No one on earth was able to conduct free trade. No trading with neutral governments. No trading with USSR.
The economic warfare was brutal, including starvation of entire economies (Kissinger: make their economy scream). The political warfare included in creating entire political parties to unseat governments, interfering in elections and paying for votes (should sound familiar). the paramilitary warfare included over 30 assassination attempts on de Gaulle and hundreds on Castro...over 90 countries were overthrown and 100's of attempts leaving over 10M dead.
JFK's assassination was a blimp on their screen. Anyone saying there was a single country behind it is ignorant of history and blinded to the actual evidence. De Gaulle is on record saying the same ppl that were attempting to kill him, killed JFK. He had actual evidence that prior to Dallas, an assassination attempt was paid for by the CIA using an OAS assassin that had been implicated in one of de Gaulle's assassination attempts. The assassin backed out at the last moment. It was one of two approaches to find assassins to kill JFK during his French state visit. It was going to be staged to look like another bumbled de Gaulle assassination attempt that missed and got JFK. All documented.
What is equally true is this syndicate not only wanted Israel to have nuclear weapons, they also assisted and we paid for Pakistan's nuclear weapons program. Why? Strategy of Tension. You control everyone in the area by ensuring one of the players you control has them. The fake countries they set up after WW2 has nuclear weapons for a reason. If you need a regional war as cover for an operation, you rattle the cages of the neighbors, weapons/aid/money flows, redirected to black ops and everyone moves on. The bilking of this system has ran for 75 years stealing our wealth and is all very well documented.
Alan Mitchell retweeted
The CIA has never worked for the President. It wasn't created to work for the president. It was a continuation of an international syndicate that walked the world into WW2 in order to create international governmental entities to implement one world government. Prior to WW2, they had to pay their own intel assets and paramilitary to overthrow foreign governments and install patsy dictators.
WW2 changed everything for them. They had the UN, IMF, World Bank, every country set up intel agencies and standing militaries paid for by taxing the citizens relieving them of the expense. The CIA set out to overthrow every head of state that declared neutrality or opposition to the US's control or were declared neutral in the choice between USSR and US/NATO. No one on earth was able to conduct free trade. No trading with neutral governments. No trading with USSR.
The economic warfare was brutal, including starvation of entire economies (Kissinger: make their economy scream). The political warfare included in creating entire political parties to unseat governments, interfering in elections and paying for votes (should sound familiar). the paramilitary warfare included over 30 assassination attempts on de Gaulle and hundreds on Castro...over 90 countries were overthrown and 100's of attempts leaving over 10M dead.
JFK's assassination was a blimp on their screen. Anyone saying there was a single country behind it is ignorant of history and blinded to the actual evidence. De Gaulle is on record saying the same ppl that were attempting to kill him, killed JFK. He had actual evidence that prior to Dallas, an assassination attempt was paid for by the CIA using an OAS assassin that had been implicated in one of de Gaulle's assassination attempts. The assassin backed out at the last moment. It was one of two approaches to find assassins to kill JFK during his French state visit. It was going to be staged to look like another bumbled de Gaulle assassination attempt that missed and got JFK. All documented.
What is equally true is this syndicate not only wanted Israel to have nuclear weapons, they also assisted and we paid for Pakistan's nuclear weapons program. Why? Strategy of Tension. You control everyone in the area by ensuring one of the players you control has them. The fake countries they set up after WW2 has nuclear weapons for a reason. If you need a regional war as cover for an operation, you rattle the cages of the neighbors, weapons/aid/money flows, redirected to black ops and everyone moves on. The bilking of this system has ran for 75 years stealing our wealth and is all very well documented.
JFK ordered an immediate halt to all sabotage operations and all attempts to overthrow the Castro regime after the peace settlement agreement. He promised not to invade Cuba. The CIA and State Department actively disobeyed direct orders to completely terminate such acts. They kept going. They didn't even attempt to stop.
Up until President Kennedy was killed, assassination plots and sabotage operations were still ongoing. This is all documented. The Church Committee confirmed it. The AMLASH files prove it. JFK's back-channel peace talks with Castro in the fall of 1963 are declassified history. Kennedy did not continue trying to overthrow Castro. He personally changed course. The people who claim the Kennedys continued to support assassination and sabotage — even while actively negotiating peace through back channels — need to go check the record properly. The CIA wasn't following orders. They were hiding operations from the President of the United States. And if they were willing to do that to him on Cuba, the question isn't whether they could potentially be involved in killing him. The question is what finally made the powers that be attempt to remove a sitting president from office?

































