infini_dee_

The Look on This Former CNN Host’s Face Over Who This Black MI Voter Supports Says Everything Abdul El-Sayed’s team will never admit it, but when he falls short in Michigan on Election Day, a big part of the reason will be his failure to lock down Black voters, and the late, heavy reliance on Barack Obama to paper over that problem has not fixed it. El-Sayed barely won the Democratic primary. He lost Detroit, roughly three-quarters Black, by a wide margin to Haley Stevens. That was not a one-off. Polling has consistently shown softer support among Black voters than the usual Democratic floor (one Fox survey put him at 77%; other surveys showed a gap between wanting Democrats to control the Senate and actually backing him). So the campaign brought in Obama for an endorsement ad and a high-profile Detroit rally on the first day of early voting, with the clear goal of maximizing turnout and loyalty in the city’s Black communities. Voter’s interviewed in Detroit called the move a turn-off or irrelevant, they saw it as the usual late-stage attempt to use Obama’s image to paper over a candidate who had not put in the work earlier. El-Sayed’s own 2012 criticism of Obama (calling him “not the right choice” for failing to deliver progressive change) only underscored the transactional feel of the endorsement. You cannot win Michigan by treating the largest reliable Democratic voting bloc as an afterthought that can be fixed with a celebrity appearance weeks before Election Day. Primary results, polling gaps, and on-the-ground skepticism already showed the problem. Bringing in Obama highlighted it instead of solving it. Hopefully Obama’s presence will turn off the Black voters for Benson too and show how she is also inline with the DSA. When you are a true American candidate, you don’t campaign for individual groups, you campaign for all Americans as a whole. Stop Communism Vote RED in the Midterms Vote America First 🇺🇸

Newsmax host Rob Schmitt sharply criticized Brazil’s left-wing political movement, describing it as “an entire political movement built on the illusion of oppression and sold to the dumbest people in society.” Reacting to street interviews conducted by Nick Shirley with supporters celebrating Lula’s victory, Schmitt argued that leaders of the movement market expansive promises of equity, free services, and an end to all hardship while consolidating power, jailing political opponents, and damaging the economy. In the segment, Schmitt highlighted how the messaging targets younger voters, women, and LGBTQ communities with appeals to perceived victimhood and anti-capitalist sentiment, even as supporters praised systems like Cuba’s. He noted the pattern is familiar: sweeping guarantees of healthcare, education, housing, and prosperity that historically deliver the opposite. The same rhetoric, he observed, echoes promises made by figures such as AOC in the United States and by earlier leftist regimes elsewhere. Schmitt framed the Brazilian example as a warning, pointing to the gap between the utopian language of “rainbows and unicorns” and the documented outcomes of power centralization and economic decline under such movements. The critique centers on the idea that the ideology relies on an exaggerated narrative of oppression to mobilize support, while actual governance expands state control and restricts dissent. With parallels drawn to American politics, the commentary underscores concerns that similar strategies are gaining traction closer to home. Stop Communism Vote RED in the Midterms Vote America First 🇺🇸