Anopsy (@Anopsy) header
Anopsy (@Anopsy) profile picture

need more data

Amsterdam
Joined October 2013
Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)Photo by Anopsy (@Anopsy)
Anopsy retweeted
Wife told me these wouldn’t fit. Little did she know I had trained for this moment for years.
545
20,099
815
361,151
12,018,761
Verrassende plaatjes. (Via reddit-dot-com)
21
29
2
298
17,480
The oldest working planetarium in the world, Eise Eisinga Planetarium in Franeker, The Netherlands.
21
967
55
7,470
218,224
21
79
10
2,394
62,310
uv that's the tweet
3
1
11
638
Shapley values, originally from cooperative game theory, are now a powerful tool in #MachineLearning for feature selection and model explainability! 🤖📊 Check out my accessible #YouTube lecture, complete with linked demonstration code, to help you get started: youtu.be/oCIybnawLdg?si=5jvH… ∀.
12
81
4,111
For everyone that needs to hear it:
44
645
23
6,575
131,931
Every time you say "garbage in, garbage out" an ML model dies.
1
1
4
297
Post-deployment data science. That's the tweet.
1
1
1
3
463
Univariate data drift doesn't show the full picture. Take a look at this demo created by my colleague @Anopsy There are two univariate distributions (top and right) which remain almost unchanged during the whole process. We can say that both look like normal distributions. If we run univariate drift detection methods such as Jensen-Shannon, Kolmogorov-Smirnov or any other, we wouldn't be alerted by those minimal changes. But if we look at their joint distribution, the story is different. The distributions of X and Z didn't change independently, but we do see sudden changes in the relationship between them. This is called Multivariate Data Drift, and no traditional univariate drift detection method can detect it. In this example, we only have two variables, so it’s easy to see the change. But what if we have a model with 10, 50, or 100 features? For that, we need algorithms capable of learning the relationships between many features and detecting when they change substantially. We came up with a method for this. It’s called Data Reconstruction with PCA. This method uses PCA to compress the feature space into a latent space. The algorithm then decompresses the latent space data and reconstructs it with some error. This error is called the reconstruction error. We can then use the learned compressor/decompressor to transform any production data and measure its reconstruction error. If the reconstruction error is bigger than an threshold, we say that the structure learned by PCA no longer represents the underlying structure of the initial data. Indicating that there is MULTIVARIATE data drift in the production data.
1
5
219
21
326
39
5,836
228,809
Data Science is my passion.
2
2
15
642
Replying to @fiat_money
where prawo Pascala?
2
8
1
78
4,324
probablyANotSoGoodIdea redd.it/1gkd2bb
50
219
24
1,669
422,372
Happy Halloween! 🎃 On this spooky day, The Batch continues its annual tradition of exploring fears related to AI. This special edition has 5 articles: * AI Burns All the Energy * Innovation Dies * No Work for Coders * Benchmarks Are Meaningless * Synthetic Data Distorts Models Are these things we should worry about? Check it out here: deeplearning.ai/the-batch/is…
48
36
294
46,905
I just love it when Python projects do this (double meaning)! The "People learn better from examples than from explanations." rings especially true.
1
22
1,192
Ritchie Vink shares with @JonKrohnLearns the “not-so-secret sauce” of #Polars, the best ways to use it, and how the open-source library may alleviate the plateaus predicted by Moore’s Law. Watch here: bit.ly/sds827
1
4
339
-- Intro -- You need to know Pandas (🐼) if you want to do Data Analysis with Python (🐍). -- Problem -- If you have no idea where to start with Pandas or want a focused approach, study the 5 functions below. -- Action -- 👉 Read the doc on them 👉 Find some examples and work(❗) through them. -- Outcome -- ✅ You're guaranteed to learn a lot along the way. ✅ You're covering a data analysis workflow start to finish. This will give you a solid basis 👍. Or I'll eat my hat 😉.
2
4
1
11
1,405
Bayes’ theorem, clearly explained:
76
1,210
82
8,369
746,106
You can pass a Polars DataFrame directly to XGBoost. The main thing to watch out for: at present you can't pass a Polars df or PyArrow table with categorical columns. This means you have to convert to old-school Pandas for the moment. Maybe  Narwhals can help with this?
1
3
12
680