CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode) header
CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode) profile picture

Talk politics and policy. Disagreement is not hate. No violence. No legal advice is intended or given. 🔞

My Quaternion is secret
Joined May 2022
Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)Photo by CodeForAutomation (@AutomationCode)
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Then what does "applying" mean? Does it mean when you leave the house, when you step into the building, when you say hello, when you introduce yourself, when you take possession of a form, when you fill out the form, when you sign the form, or when you turn it in?
6
A term not defined by statute then falls to the controlling case law (if applicable), then to the law dictionary (which often cites the controlling case law), and then to the common dictionary. Where is it defined? (revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite…, revisor.mn.gov/laws/1981/0/S…)
1
8
Replying to @Zoya_ki_batein
Then it should be marriage fraud if they have before marriage without telling the man, or grounds for divorce after with no kind of spousal support, if she got it without his buy off.
1
50
Beyond that, the purposes of laws are to deal with a particular malfeasance. And so would not then the underlying matter they were trying to address was people submitting, formally, something false? So how do you get to an argument that mere speech being a crime? 2/2
7
By your logic, it could begin when someone walks in the door, or when a person leaves the house. The law doesn't say, yet you want to pick a flavor that favors the prosecution. If you were a judge following the Rule of Lenity, what do you think ought be the preferred reading? 1/
1
12
It is highlighted. It say 31% they know another woman who made false accusation, and 7% admitted to already having made a false accusation. You then want to pretend "could imagine doing".
1
1
52
And again, the question is how is a person to know what it means in the statute? It doesn't say when the 'formal' process starts.
1
37
CodeForAutomation retweeted
7
57
2
302
4,733
CodeForAutomation retweeted
The prosecutor filed charges DESPITE admitting that O'Keefe and his team had NO intent to vote and they didn't sign an oath vouching for anyone. Basically, he was charged because he proved how easy it is for other people to defraud elections. Any time voter ID requirements are removed, it creates an excuse to rig elections.
James O’Keefe on the Felony Charges for Exposing Fraud in Minnesota: This is not political. It is fundamental. It is about whether citizens still have the right to question their government. This is now a landmark First Amendment case, and every American’s right to speak truth to power has been put on the line. Weaponized lawfare does not work against me. It has always backfired on the people who come after me. Most people find criminal charges and lawsuits stressful; the process becomes a form of punishment. But I love this process because it gives me the opportunity to expose injustice at the highest levels. My foundation will be indemnifying members of the Justice League, including @camhigby for their lawful reporting. I’m calling on all Americans, and especially all journalists, to stand united on a message to the prosecutors in Minnesota: the politics of fear will not prevail in the United States of America.
111
1,393
20
5,413
52,621
And 'applying' means what? Many people might feel it is void-for-vagueness, or feel it violates the Clear Statement rule. (thelawdictionary.org/apply/), says "apply" means a formal request (in writing). How would a "formal request" have started by mere talking?
2
2
74
CodeForAutomation retweeted
It's a sad truth. And women are the reason we are going down this road. So many women I know personally who are very attractive, and wont settle down for anything less than a dude who has 500 million dollars lol. Or are running onlyfans and being a boss babe.
Artificial wombs are the future and women cannot do anything about it.
28
4
1
41
4,242
You think they won't be able to engineer the growth of milk with an artificial programmed immune cells setup creating any necessary anti-bodies? Women "inspired" greatness. And then they made marriage impossible and ruined morality with state subsidy and state monopoly on force.
18
Replying to @WomenReadWomen
Women who choose not to have children, are self eliminating their genes, which is mostly white liberal women who wait to 30+ to try. But, scientist can already make artificial eggs from stem or skin cells. So science+ ego+ideology is making women obsolete. news.ohsu.edu/2025/09/30/ohs…
21
Women who choose not to have children, are self eliminating their genes, which is mostly white liberal women who wait to 30+ to try. But, scientist can already make artificial eggs from stem or skin cells. So science+ ego+ideology is making women obsolete. news.ohsu.edu/2025/09/30/ohs…
20