Azhaar retweeted
I have issues with the Ashari DCT view, but Asharis did not invent the position.
Al-Bayhaqī records this statement from Iyās ibn Muʿāwiyah (d. ~122 AH), plus commentary. Earlier (pre-Ashari) sources also authentically record it. See second screenshot from Al-Firyābī (d. 301AH).
Azhaar retweeted
Whereas we only go to heaven by Allah's mercy so not because of the produced good.
So what he says is in fact true - according to the calculus moral realists opperate under - God is absurdly unjust and deprived of wisdom.
Azhaar retweeted
It’s very striking to me how many moral objections against God from Atheists have already been utilised by Ash’aris against ethical realists.
Worth keeping in mind that establishing the existence of God is independent of any moral concerns. Here’s al-Ghazali:
“He who is troubled by an eternal residence in paradise because it was not preceded by toiling and fulfilling obligations is too insignificant to be addressed or debated”
— al-Ghazali
“Had the purpose of creating and bringing [the world] into being been these paltry pleasures—when the Creator knew that abundant pains would occur—[He] would have knowingly created a preponderant evil for the sake of a comparatively meagre good”
—al-Razi
On the topic of taklif al-Ghazali writes:
“I wish I knew how a reasonable person finds it acceptable to say that there is benefit for mankind in being obligated. The very meaning of benefit negates hardship; and to obligate is precisely to require hardship, which is pain.”
Though he may not have so explicitly stated what I did, it is clear his objective is to prove how God should be considered unjust by his interlocutors’ standards
It’s far closer to kufr to place bounds, laws, and commands upon our Lord by suggesting what he can and cannot do.
Azhaar retweeted
🧵 Early Ashʿari theology presents one of the most uncompromising views in moral philosophy. Moral value does not sit inside actions themselves. An action becomes wrong because God prohibits it, and becomes obligatory because God commands it. (1/24)
Azhaar retweeted
DCT can be a hard pill to swallow, but I have yet to see a convincing argument against it that isn’t just a convoluted appeal to emotion.
What alternative model of morality remains rationally consistent without compromising God’s will and absolute independence in some way?
Listen, I just don’t think it’s just to inflict the most horrific suffering, including debilitating illnesses and sexual abuse, on innocent children in order to test their parents.
The promise of heavenly reward does not resolve the issue, since God could have freely given this reward without any prior suffering.
Indeed, to withhold that which benefits someone but does nothing to harm you is considered a miserly act amongst us.





















