“Shumpert has a ring AI have a legacy” is a bar
Calling Iverson a “loser” because he never won a ring is CRAZY. He changed NBA culture, influenced a generation & paved the way for today’s guards. He also carried a limited 76ers roster to the Finals against Kobe & Shaq. Shumpert has a ring, AI has a legacy. No comparison
1
55
People 100% don’t bring up rings even when you debate baseball nobody mentions how Barry bounds don’t have a WS..Devante Adams not having a SB they both are considered one of the best to ever play their sport but yeah ring culture matters.. does rings help the argument YES
When people debate whose the best QB rings don’t get mentioned until the very of the end argument. Basketball it’s the first thing mentioned they don’t care about MVPS,DPOYS, All NBAs,scoring titles, assists leaders, none of that. Straight to Ring culture talks and it’s terrible
You wasn’t the reason them teams had winning records buddy be talking like he was a main option on them teams
Nice and cool. My point exactly. not about numbers. Ask how many times I missed playoffs? Or ask how many winning teams I’ve been on? Or check teams I’ve been on with defensive ratings? Real stats I wasn’t a cone I switched and guarded everyone. He could never. LuVGang
24
He plays for the Green Bay Packers he will never get that grace man
Literally convinced they don’t watch the games or they’re tryna push a narrative he had back to back multi int games in playoffs and then lost. Jordan literally threw a bad pick against San Fran on a drive to win the game and they still hold that against him and the playoff game with Philly from his second year as a starter playing hurt😂😂😂 when Jordan love gonna get that grace like WHAT ARE WE DOING
17
Aight now this nigga is the new McCants I see
Gilbert Arenas and Iman Shumpert clash over why Nikola Jokić gets praised for his triple doubles while Russell Westbrook was often accused of stat padding.
Arenas argues that the media has moved the goalposts, pointing out that Westbrook was repeatedly criticized for chasing triple doubles, while Jokić receives widespread praise for putting up similar numbers. He questions why the standard changes depending on the player, insisting that a triple double should be judged by the same criteria regardless of who records it.
Shumpert pushes back, arguing that the biggest difference is winning. He points out that Jokić has won an NBA championship, while Westbrook has not, suggesting that team success is what makes people view their statistical achievements differently.
Arenas maintains that the media’s inconsistent standards are exactly the problem, while Shumpert believes winning changes the conversation.
28
I ain’t gone lie you are focused on the wrong things. You need to be focusing on how to help the team you are on win a few games instead of trying to be a politician or whatever tf you cosplaying as
Praying for the lost souls at Nasser Hospital 🙏🏾 Doctors and children dying in hospitals that are much needed in the region that are used as command centers for Hamas. Truly evil. Free Palestine 🇵🇸
29






















