First of all, all of you people mysteriously coming here to defend this seem to have never once read my posts. I spent years saying that nobody controls Dogecoin, and nobody should control Dogecoin, and nobody and nothing is official, and that THOSE X accounts should be handed over to the community. I am not sure how any decent person could NOT be disgusted at seeing an account that used to represent an open-source, decentralized effort being renamed into an account run by a for-profit company. The renaming and repurposing of dogecoin_devs into DogecoinLabs might even violate @X's authenticity rules. It surprises me that a well-funded company would want to do that. How should those accounts be used/controlled? I know it might be difficult for y'all to understand, since this is a bit unusual in the crypto niche where people want control and money. But I have zero interest in or intention of getting involved in controlling that channel. The thing I tried to propose in the past to the holders of the @dogecoin and dogecoin_devs accounts was to establish a system where everybody could vote on news to be posted there, with a final review by 4-5 people rotating every few months. So the channel could have space to promote new for-profit commercial ventures, but it would ALSO have space to criticize and warn people about the risks. All posts would need to contain risk and affiliation disclaimers. Instead, we now have both accounts shilling commercial products, including a bridge that, at the time of the post, had critical bugs, a for-profit L2 which is aimed, among other things, at supporting tokens, and a wallet that has encouraged users to link their identity to their crypto holdings (and whose CTO encouraged people NOT to save their seed phrases locally). All of the above should have had no space to be posted in those channels without proper risk disclosure. A lot of people are going to lose their pants, like they lost them to House of Doge (shilled by the "Foundation" people, who never apologized or followed up on that).

My intervention was among other things AGAINST the takeover of the dogecoin channels by Dogecoin Labs. They took control of community resources (the old dogecoin_devs X account that in the past was used by Dogecoin Core developers was renamed to DogecoinLabs) because the Dogecoin “Foundation” (a group with no mandate to represent the Dogecoin community and which pushed several disasters over the past years) gave them access to the channel. I am against all of this and disgusted by it. Do not try to frame my opinion in support of it.