Outlaw money for an opt-in world. Native on @zano_project.
Joined July 2024
- Tweets875
- Following397
- Followers451
- Likes1.3K
Twelve years for Monero this year. Twelve years of privacy on by default, regulators pushing back, and a community that never watered down the mission. That earns respect.
But the family tree overlaps: Boolberry, Zano's predecessor, launched in 2014, Monero borrowed ideas from it early, and Zano got to watch a decade of Monero's production lessons.
Picture two trading agents on Ethereum, each reading the other's full position history. No bluffing, no quiet accumulation, no exit that doesn't telegraph itself. On Zano, neither one knows the other's position, history, or strategy.
Estimates vary by methodology, but MEV extraction on Ethereum runs into hundreds of millions of dollars a year, much of it degrading execution for regular users. "Private mempools" and "MEV protection" are patches on a root cause: visible transactions.
An AI agent's baseline ask from a chain: JSON-RPC wallet access, not a browser extension built for humans clicking buttons. Transactions private by default. Multiple confidential assets, because real agents hold stablecoins and wrapped assets, not one coin.
Zano ticks the privacy boxes: simplewallet RPC, default-private transactions, multiple confidential assets, Zarcanum staking, Ionic Swaps, aliases, tracking seeds. No other chain puts that combination behind default privacy.
Stack on stealth addresses (one-time keys per tx, receiver hidden), confidential amounts (Pedersen commitments, amount hidden), and asset-type hiding. Sender hidden, receiver hidden, amount hidden, asset hidden. Every transfer, no box to tick.
On-chain voting with visible balances leaks every voter's economic weight. Whales get mapped, then pressured, bribed, or targeted. Curve, Compound, every major DAO has lived some version of this. It's a governance problem transparent chains can't engineer around.