Behrooz Astaneh (@BehroozAstaneh) profile picture
Joined August 2019
Photo by Behrooz Astaneh (@BehroozAstaneh)Photo by Behrooz Astaneh (@BehroozAstaneh)Photo by Behrooz Astaneh (@BehroozAstaneh)Photo by Behrooz Astaneh (@BehroozAstaneh)
Why do so many medical papers get rejected? 🔬 I'm hosting a FREE live seminar on Jan 13, 2027 — what editors look for, and the mistakes to avoid. Register here: instats.org/seminar/why-medi… #MedicalResearch #MedicalWriting
6
Why do medical papers get rejected? 🔬 Join my FREE seminar! 📅 Jan 13, 2027. Register here: instats.org/seminar/why-medi… #MedicalResearch #MedicalWriting
18
Behrooz Astaneh retweeted
✨ Join the FREE IMR Press Webinar! 📅 Date: Thursday, December 4, 2025 ⏰ Time: 12:00–13:00 GMT / 13:00–14:00 CET 📌 Register now: us06web.zoom.us/meeting/regi… 🔗 More details: imrpress.com/news/1991311916… #IMRPressWebinar #ResearchIntegrity #PublicationEthics #AcademicPublishing
4
6
9
2,750
The first ever meta-analysis accompanied by a comprehensive systematic review of articles published on the impact of medical writing/publishing education. A move towards evidence based medical journalology. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.… #medicalwriting #publishing #metaanalysis
2
2
340
Filling the gap in evidence-based medical journalology; how to use a standard curriculum to teach medical writing and publishing and how to assess its effect using the first trustworthy measurement tool in this regard. Read the full text here: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307681
1
2
3
509
Behrooz Astaneh retweeted
Join @CMAJ's @BehroozAstaneh this November at @McmasterU and develop a clear understanding of what it takes to get your next #manuscript accepted. Register for our two-day workshop here: rb.gy/bsq4j. #newPI #MedEd #AcademicTwitter #WritingCommunity
1
2
397
The WAME released its new recommendation on “Chatbots, Generative AI, and Scholarly Manuscripts” today. This new recommendation emphasizes the importance for editors and reviewers to specify “to authors and each other, any use of chatbots in the evaluation of the manuscript and
1
41
generation of reviews and correspondence”. Furthermore, the new recommendation highlights the necessity of explicitly stating the usage of AI tools when presenting research findings, such as when generating tables or figures. This information should be included in both
1
32
the Abstract and Methods sections. Authors should provide the complete prompt used to generate the research results, with the time and date of the query, and details regarding the AI tool and its version. #medicalpublishing #medicaljournalology #ArtificialIntelligence
26
Artificial intelligence (AI) is going to change the future of medical publishing. Likewise, peer review as an important component of medical publishing is going to be changed. In the newly released ICMJE recommendations, it is advised that "Reviewers must maintain"
1
22
"the confidentiality of the manuscript, which may prohibit the uploading of the manuscript to software or other AI technologies where confidentiality cannot be assured. Reviewers should disclose to journals if and how AI technology is being used to facilitate their review."
1
21
"Reviewers should be aware that AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete, or biased."
17
ICMJE has modified the second criterion of its authorship criteria. The original phrase of “drafting the work or revising it for important intellectual content” has been changed to “drafting the work or reviewing it critically for important intellectual content”.
1
3
379