Pinned Tweet
We know a storm’s coming, and I know what side I’m on.
I’m with Thomas Massie on the America First side. We need a unifier, not a divider. America First.🇺🇸
Michael Bennett retweeted
“When will the war in Iran end? Whenever I want it to end." So much for the legal fiction that it isn’t a war.
U.S. law and the Constitution prohibit the Executive branch from fighting a war that isn’t declared or authorized by Congress.
Michael Bennett retweeted
There is no justice in America.
Imagine stealing $5.6 million dollars from taxpayers and only getting 6 months in prison.
America is a joke.
Our Republic is a hoax.
The taxpayers are robbed blind and we have no representation.
If a country supposedly as free as America can become as completely and utterly corrupted as it is today, especially by foreign influence, I wouldn't call that undefeated. I'd call it a country in desperate need of change. The Constitution isn't the problem. The people entrusted to uphold it are.
Michael Bennett retweeted
Israel had their parliamentary elections yesterday but Americans couldn’t vote in them which feels like taxation without representation.
Michael Bennett retweeted
End the war with Iran .@realDonaldTrump.
You promised no new wars.
Michael Bennett retweeted
Concise, no spin @grok. Country only
Which 𝗙𝗔𝗞𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗨𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗬 had its own 𝗣𝗥𝗜𝗠𝗘 𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗥 𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗔𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗔𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗜𝗡 𝟭𝟵𝟵𝟱 to stop a 𝗣𝗘𝗔𝗖𝗘 𝗗𝗘𝗔𝗟?
Michael Bennett retweeted
Replying to @WhiteHouse
Trump’s looking forward to finding out who his new master will be so he can continue to “win for America.” 😂
Michael Bennett retweeted
Looking forward to seeing if Satan or Baal wins the elections in Israel today!
BREAKING: Israel’s deadlock could preserve Netanyahu while core military policies outlast electoral change
Israel’s inconclusive election reveals a deeper political reality: Benjamin Netanyahu could remain prime minister without securing a new governing majority, while Israel’s broader military and security trajectory may endure regardless of who ultimately governs.
Under Israel’s continuity-of-government law, Netanyahu remains caretaker prime minister until a successor successfully forms a government. If repeated elections fail to produce one, his administration can continue operating without a renewed parliamentary mandate, subject to legal constraints.
More importantly, the divide between Netanyahu and Gadi Eisenkot may be greater over political leadership than over fundamental security objectives. Both oppose Palestinian statehood, insist on Israeli security control over Palestinian territories, and support renewed military operations in Gaza if Hamas refuses to disarm.
This reflects substantial continuity across Israel’s dominant Jewish-led political camps and security establishment. Netanyahu’s nationalist coalition remains closely associated with the military campaigns of recent years, while Eisenkot, himself a former military chief, shares important strategic objectives despite opposing Netanyahu’s leadership.
The differences are nevertheless consequential. Eisenkot opposes unauthorized West Bank settlements and certain expansion projects supported by Netanyahu’s coalition. Palestinian-led parties and parts of the Israeli opposition also challenge the prevailing political direction.
The central takeaway: Israel’s election may determine who commands the state without fundamentally transforming its security doctrine. Netanyahu benefits institutionally from parliamentary deadlock, while substantial agreement on military objectives among the principal contenders creates another form of continuity.
The premiership is contested, but the underlying security framework is far less so.





























