
6 years of experience investing, trading, and using #bitcoin. Occasional altcoin and NFT commentary.
Joined November 2020
- Tweets7.1K
- Following152
- Followers465
- Likes6.5K
HFSP democrats
More than a year ago, the House passed the Clarity Act.
There’s been progress since — thousands of hours of bipartisan negotiations took place at the staff and Member levels. The Senate Committees on Banking and Agriculture advanced their respective titles. And Senate Republicans produced a floor-ready product that, as I type this, is waiting for a vote.
It’s disappointing — but not surprising — that Senate Democrats are choosing politics on the cusp of a major victory for American leadership. Find another instance in history where Congress, when given the choice, opted to push an industry out of the United States rather than smartly regulate it. American Exceptionalism was once a bipartisan goal; if Clarity fails, I have serious doubts.
These same Democrats — many of whom have taken millions of dollars from the crypto industry — proclaim that Clarity lacks safeguards for consumers and falls short in countering illicit finance. Nothing could be further from the truth. Titles II and III materially uplift regulatory and compliance obligations for digital asset intermediaries, placing them on similar footing with traditional financial institutions. The Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act — which Washington lobbyists have spun up as a boogeyman for certain groups of prosecutors and law enforcement — does nothing other than codify longstanding Treasury Department policy that’s remained consistent across Administrations: non-custodial builders and developers are not, and have never been, subject to registration obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act. And at this point, major law enforcement trades that once opposed the bill, including the Fraternal Order of Police, have now endorsed it.
The Senate needs to vote NOW on this landmark legislation. The truth is that Senate Democrats are afraid to advance the Clarity Act as they fear Senator Warren and the “Anti-Crypto Army” she once promised to build. In the days ahead, Leader Thune will put this theory to the test. Will Senate Democrats be on the side of American Exceptionalism, or will they opt to cede American leadership of a global industry for fear of the bespectacled squirrel’s Left flank?
America will lead or America won’t. It’s not more complicated than that. I believe Satoshi once said it best:
“If you don’t believe me or don’t get it, I don’t have time to try to convince you, sorry.”
The more you see these kinds of uninformed, stupid takes, the closer we are to a bottom. #bitcoin
Don’t think the bottom is in for #bitcoin but then again OC is back again talking about $BTC going to zero 😂
youtube.com/shorts/IXNUM4FMq…
People are excessively bearish on #bitcoin
Like post Luna and FTX bearish. Yet, technicals and top analytics are very far removed from that level of destruction.
More likely to see a face melting rally from here than a top.
Bitcoin Curious Guy retweeted
I know this feels painful.
But $BTC was the same price 11 days ago.
Bitcoin Curious Guy retweeted
Replying to @Dorialexander
USD: loses 3-5% value every year, forever
BTC: gains 40% compounded annually for 15 years, but with material volatility
Perhaps you personally prefer "less volatile and down forever" but you can't understand why some would prefer the alternative?
Wouldn’t be surprised if Trey pulled back 5% from here and #bitcoin back to the 110 level in the short term with dominance retesting the highs
I’m a time traveler
Follow me for more time travel guaranteed news
#bitcoin
120 thousand United States dollars for 1 #bitcoin
Bitcoin Curious Guy retweeted
If you don’t own 1 Bitcoin ignore every stock market product that is tied to Bitcoin
No MSTY, MSTR, CEP, FLD, ETC
Bitcoin is the savings account
Everything else is speculation
Stack Bitcoin & ignore everything else













