Certified BSV Stacker 🥒
Joined February 2021
My X feed is currently full of old school Bitcoiners like this, hating on Adam Back, Blockstream, and Bitcoin Core for their ties to Epstein, and some are now asking how deep the rabbit hole goes. @gavinandresen, to whom Satoshi originally gave the keys to the code repository, had his GitHub access keys revoked after he endorsed Craig Wright (@CsTominaga) as Satoshi around the time Epstein became involved. Gavin has never recanted that claim, as far as I know. The release of the Epstein files over the past weekend has vindicated so many conspiracy theorists. So why stop there? We trusted Adam Back when he said Craig Wright wasn't Satoshi. I definitely trust Gavin Andresen more than Adam Back at this stage. I really don't know what or who to believe anymore, so I'm buying some Bitcoin SV at $15, just in case this shit gets any weirder, if that's at all possible... Interestingly, Binance seems to only list a perp for BSV, not BSV itself, which enables naked shorting of BSV and could trigger a massive short squeeze if people start buying BSV and taking it off exchanges. Seems like a good risk/reward play.
No matter how much I like Bitcoin I cannot ignore Adam Back's involvement with the largest pedo ring in history. He kept silence for 12 years. The only reason he mentioned anything was because he got caught red handed. He should be immediately banned from anything BTC related
125
124
49
457
164,838
Bitcrash retweeted
Michael Saylor’s average Bitcoin purchase price is $76,037. BTC is currently at $77,000. That means on his roughly $4.5 billion investment in Bitcoin since 2020, he’s up just about 1%. That is one of the most abysmal returns I’ve ever seen, and it’s going to get much worse. His strategy failed, and anyone who ignored his hype is sitting very comfortably right now.
263
153
22
2,317
450,252
Sigh. In time, that "spam" becomes applications.
2
1
11
Bitcrash retweeted
Most of the Exchanges conspire together to manipulate markets. They claim BSV delistings were 'in the interests of safety', yet refuse to remove 100s of thousands of shitcoin scams. If you're looking for the head of the snake, it's the Zionists. Blackrock, Vanguard, Blockstream, and 'Big Tech'. Craig has publicly stated for many years that 2026 is the year things may be interesting with a 'Satoshi wake up'. Here's hoping for the wildest storm yet 🌩🤞 🔥👇 Down with the Cabal 🥳
2
4
33
904
Bitcrash retweeted
BSV
1
10
484
Only possible on BSV. Any other blockchain will always introduce trusted third parties to scale to a digitised global financial system.
Larry Fink just dropped a major blueprint for the future at the World Economic Forum: a fully digitized global financial system. Every asset, stocks, bonds, real estate, money market funds, even cash, would exist on a single unified blockchain. Ownership would be tokenized, fractionalized, programmable, and instantly transferable. Fink says the goal is to “reduce corruption”, but the plan effectively centralizes control over the entire global economy in one digital system. This isn’t science fiction, this is the direction BlackRock and elite financial institutions are pushing right now.
7
9
52
2,107
Bitcrash retweeted
One Blockchain. One Protocol. One Whitepaper. Remember who you are, Bitcoin
6
19
3
81
2,223
Bitcrash retweeted
Bitcoin is collapsing. Compared to its 2017 peak vs silver, it has lost 27.6%, wiping out 9 years of gains entirely.
63
54
6
392
40,167
Bitcrash retweeted
3
4
61
1,104
Bitcrash retweeted
The Bitcoin maxi propaganda playbook is no longer effective at luring in new investors to prop up the bubble. Just in the past week alone, the usual narratives were rolled out in full force. CZ claimed we are in some fairytale “super-cycle” and urged everyone to buy in, while Michael Saylor deployed another $2 billion (of shareholders funds) into BTC with virtually no impact on price. At the same time, maxi media pushed increasingly absurd stories, from imminent alien disclosure to Bitcoin being the only hedge against reality itself. Meanwhile, the so-called “digital gold” thesis is falling apart in real time, as gold rips to new all-time highs while Bitcoin sells off. On-chain data also shows coins continuing to move from cold storage to exchanges, a pattern that historically precedes selling, not accumulation. ETFs and big firms are jumping ship. Tether even tried printing billions to prop up the markets, but the sell pressure was so extreme, it wiped out their orders in under 30 minutes. Investors are waking up and realizing these old tactics no longer work. Bitcoin has no utility or real demand, it has already slipped into the $90K range, and the downside from here is far larger than most are prepared to admit.
48
56
13
401
27,734
Replying to @Kryptokrates
One nail. More coming.
20
25
11
134
9,521
Bitcrash retweeted
If you have something valuable to share with the entire #BSV community from YouTube or Rumble then be sure to post it on @LocalBsvSaaS we hit over 100 Videos posted and over 8 BSV in Tips! Start posting and start earning! No #BSV required to share 🥂🔥 #Bitcoin #CryptoNews #Makemoney
2
1
15
3,328
The Famous 2014 Satoshi Nakamoto "Hack": 1) A REAL HACKER WOULDN'T DO THIS ⬇️: The "Hacker" sends completely-obvious notices to well-known Coron developers whitch easily broadcasts that Satohi's account is hacked. I'm talking about completely amateur-hour posts, so dumb, that even the village idiot could understand them. This happens never. A hacker would try his best to pretend he was Satoshi and try to get btc or other monies from those in Satoshi's contact list. THAT would be a very common and expected hack motive. But the REAL hacker, who likely had a different motive for the hack, didn't think this through, but this alone reveals a lot about the ACTUAL hacker cosplaying as a dunder-headed hacker for a purpose. It appears the hacker created the appearance of a hack by dumbassery fuzzy foriegners, in order to embellish the image everyone has in their head of non-English-speaking "Russian Hacker" or some other stereotype. I suspect the REAL hacker spoker perfect English and did a MUCH more hacker-like hack on Satoshi-- framing him by having access to his files for many months and planning this hacker "reveal". 2) REAL HACKER LIKELY PART OF GITHUB DEV SQUAD: Don't worry about the hack tho! The Coron developers have saved it by ALREADY having scrubbed Satoshi Nakamoto from his own code at SourceForge and Github never invited him to come back despite everyone knowing his email addresses. Nicely written article by @polinachernykh5 coinspeaker.com/bitcoin-crea… 3) GREGORY MAXWELL IS ALWAYS THERE AT THE SCENE OF THE CRIME, ISN'T HE? Like he's staring over the perpetrators' shoulders. Just like all the supposed "forgeries" he uncovered within minutes or hours of Satoshi documents being released to the public, to explain EXACTLY how they were forged as if he knew in advance of the document leaks, one of the first person's to respond to the "hacker" emails, and one of the first person's to GET an email from the hacked Satoshi email account, is one Gregory Maxwell. Strange how he's always at the scene of the crime, as if his "pre-crime" bat-phone rings to tell him to get ready for a coming hack or forgery. Remember the old simple adage: "He who smellt-it, dealt-it?". In other words, PROXIMITY is a clue, and nullc has his proxmity meter beeping every time there's a Satoshi-level hack or revelation, as if his JOB was hacking Satoshi and suppressing who he really is. WHO DOES THAT? Who devotes so much time to debunking someone? There's only about 4 wierdos who do that, vehemently, and GMax is the old original. That should tell you something. Motive? Simple, money and power. If Satoshi returns, he should get his repo keys back, and his copyright, and should be able to distinguish who the "honest miners" (wording from white paper) actually are, and who are the miners who dishonestly stole the bitcoin copyright, ticker symbols, file format, bitcoin code repository keys, and white paper from Satoshi, not to mention the bitcoin.org domain and the bitcoin forums. 4) IS NULLC RELATED TO THE SPOOKY (GHISAINE) MAXWELL FAMILY? We just learned from leaked Epstein emails last month that Epstein was VERY aware of Bitcoin from early days, and seemed intent on influencing the Coron developers. Perhaps Ghisaine and one of her family members named Gregory were close to the bitcoin metal? Later, MIT and Joi Ito plus Mastercard are Blockstream investors, with direct monetary influence on the Bitcoin Coron devs paychecks. Lo and behold, the Bitcoin protocol is changed to force Lightning Network, a "trusted 3rd party" to smaller transactions (the exact OPPOSITE of what you'd want-- it's the large transactions from suspect sources like kiddie porn, assasination markets, and heroin and nuclear bomb materials sales which need a middleman, not the small ones). Blockstream's "man in the middle" L2 solution becomes the standard, which isn't suprising given Backwards Adam and GMax working there and also having strong influence on the Bitcoin community. Long story short, has nullc ever publicly proven he's not related in any way to Ghisaine? He's always looking for Satoshi to show keys to prove Satoshiness; well, how about "showing keys" (put money where mouth is) to show he's most definitely NOT related to her? Seems simple enough, what with all the 23andMe-type tests out there today. Prove no contact with Ghisaine's relatives, and I'll happily write an apology-- keyword PROVE. 5) Notice that Satoshi was soon hacked after he posted "I am not Dorian Nakamoto". This could've EASILY been done by a mole hacker who had hacked Satoshi's computers with listening & keystroke monitors (from the inside where Satoshi, a security expert, would've been. unsuspecting and vulnerable-- it's "always an inside job". Thus, not long after being nice and helping a pestered man out with Satoshi's burden, Satoshi was hacked. CONCLUSION: Foul play. I suspect foul play. If you can read Jeffrey Epstein's emails, revealed only recently, they confirm what historians like @kurtwuckertjr have been saying for years, that Jeffrey was at least "in the know" of attempts to co-opt Bitcoin, if not a central player, and the emails finally prove this to be true, not to mention SOME likely true parts to Roger Ver's book (altho I don't trust him as a source for all things regarding the story). How convenient that the REAL hacker could have released many undisclosed documents from the Satoshi pile, from Satoshi's actual computer, AFTER he did bad rudimentary, again completely-obvious, tampering with the files to make them look like they're corrupt, then dox Satoshi himself, and then once the doxxing generates buzz, be able to IMMEDIATELY power-sleuth all the little forgery-details within record time. That's like finding a needle in a haystack because you know where you hid the needle yourself, eh? This is a juvenile-style hacker, who thought himself very clever, but actually left many clues to the real hack. And the hacking of Satoshi continues to this day, there are other ways Satoshi is actively being hacked and suppressed. More on that later tho, but some people have been doing good detective work for years and the truth sometimes takes time to get out. More will come out over time, as it already has, you can bank on that. One way you know the REAL hacker is sweating profusely like a pig, is the ones who could be implicated in the crimes against Satoshi are loudly trying to get you to not watch or believe the upcoming "Killing Satoshi" movie. As Always, Where is Michael 'Niklaus Weber' Grönager? The SDNY is looking for him, for involvement in the Celsius Network fraud for which Mashinsky is serving a 30 year prison sentence for stealing even less money than largest (anonymous) investor "Niklaus Weber" who happens to have the same name as the disappeared founder of AnonymousSpeech.com which until 2022-2023 held the evidence of Satoshi's registration of his (2014-HACKED) email address and domain name. With the larger world starting to standardize on this supposed "digital gold" that Coron developers market heavily (see any Backwards Adam Back tweet, majority of which is price talk), you'd think that maybe it would be quite important for the largest government in the world to get its facts straight, especially given Jeffrey Epstein emails coming to light about bitcoin. But hey, maybe the United States is just ready to "shoot from the hip" gunslinger-style when it comes to playing around with things like the United States Dollar security, and equity-token strategies. Ya know, fly blind, like the #1 government in the world oughtta? Seemms responsible. Because you know, the USA is terrible at figuring out mysteries like the whereabouts of Osama Bin Laden, Saddam Hussein and other well-known hidden figures. But what you should be asking yourself is: At least the USA loudly announced the man-hunt for bin Laden and Hussein and Ross Ulbricht, but no effort to figure out who Satoshi Nakamoto is? Yeahhhhhhh, that doesn't make sense. So either your government is corrupt too, or they're about to risk everyone's savings and money by supporting schemes like Tether, btc, and other cryptoCrap publicly and loudly, without doing even a cursory amount of due-diligence on the most important question: Who is Satoshi Nakamoto? Me? I believe Satoshi was hacked right after, and probably because of, the "I am not Dorian..." email, and then the hacker spent months digging into Satoshi's files and figuring out how to exploit his knowledge to the maximum-- like a REAL hacker would, not the cosplayed "fuzzy foriegner" kid-like hack that was exposed to the world and isn't even remotely believable. After months of planning, then the plan was unleashed. Satoshi was loudly broadcasted as "hacked" (mostly revealed by Coron devs themselves) These are my strong researched opinions after decades of being a fraud-hound in equities (of which I feel like I've run into every type of fraud known to man), starting with the many dotcom frauds back in the late 90s. The stories told by btc Corons don't add up; in fact, it paints an opposite picture which points back to them, and the Epstein email-release is another nail in their coffin, but there are more to come, just wait, and there's nobody they can kill to stop them either. The real Satoshi has been baiting them for over a decade, and they never fail to eat the forbidden fruit buttered on the trap doors. This is not a recommendation to do anything, only to watch and listen. Truth has a nasty way of coming out. Freedom of Information Act will also eventually reveal who the seller of the 80,000 Satoshi-era btc was, because the seller was a customer at Galaxy Digital, which is under intense KYC/AML scrutiny. Thus, the US Government already knows who that is, and if they don't, then the government itself is corrupt as can be.
2
2
3
23
2,023
Bitcrash retweeted
Replying to @bsvdrip @CaptainBSV
Craig’s walk in the park to Salomon Brothers. 277 733 1,000
2
5
20
1,015
Bitcrash retweeted
Saylor trying to tell you that buying leveraged encumbered paper Bitcoin is better than buying Bitcoin 🤡.
28
7
2
121
11,091
Replying to @saylor
Amazing that you are still buying. You are already down almost 5% on your last purchase (that's about $100 million.) Plus, your average cost is now just under $76K. That's less than a 20% return to show for over five years of leveraged Bitcoin buying. Too bad you didn't buy gold.
288
52
20
1,803
117,908
Bitcoin Is For Everyone Credit: @CsTominaga
15
29
3
57
2,046
🚨 On Nov 15, the BSV fee will jump from 1 sat/kB → 100 sat/kB — a 100× increase. This isn’t just a technical change. It strikes at the core of what Bitcoin was designed to be. 🧵 A thread on why this move threatens BSV’s future ↓
18
5
3
28
6,970
Bitcrash retweeted
HighCalvin Vulnerability Report Bitcoin’s critical failure is not cryptographic. It’s economic + coordination-based — and it does not require a 51% attack. 🧵👇 ⸻ 1/ This is not theoretical. It’s a fee-policy exploit. Quite literally, all miners can do it. They raise the minimum fee to 1 BTC / kB, continue mining blocks like nothing happened, and stall non-compliant transactions indefinitely. ⸻ 2/ While the network is effectively frozen for normal users, miners (or aligned entities): • Short BTC with max leverage • Cash out BTC already sitting on exchanges • Let panic + settlement delay do the rest Retail is locked. Insiders exit first 😂 ⸻ 3/ Key point: 👉 You do NOT need 51% hashrate. You only need to: • Convince enough miners to adopt the same fee floor • Share the excess fee rewards • Maintain coordination temporarily This is easier than a classic 51% attack. ⸻ 4/ Why this works: Bitcoin has no fee ceiling. Fees are “market-based,” but miners control inclusion. Fees don’t need to be infinite — only temporarily exclusionary, especially during volatility. That’s the attack surface. ⸻ 5/ Mechanics of the exploit: • Miners set absurd minimum fees (e.g. 1 BTC/kB) • Continue mining (even near-empty blocks) • Normal txs don’t clear • Settlement latency explodes • Price discovery moves off-chain This is a fee-based DoS, not a hash takeover. ⸻ 6/ What’s changed is scale. At ~$90k–$120k BTC (2025–2026): • Market cap ≈ $1.8–2T • Derivatives OI routinely $50–100B+ ⸻ 7/ Why multi-billion dollar damage is realistic: If coordinated actors short even 5–10% of open interest near local tops: • Forced settlement delays amplify panic • Retail can’t move • Liquidations cascade Losses easily reach billions — possibly tens of billions. ⸻ 8/ Important distinction: This does not break PoW. This does not violate consensus. It exploits: • Fee discretion • Miner coordination • Small block constraints • Off-chain markets settling faster than on-chain users Bitcoin works as deployed — that’s the problem. ⸻ 9/ Why block size matters: Small blocks (BTC): • Amplify fee pressure • Make stalling trivial Larger-block chains (e.g. BSV): • Allow honest miners to clear backlog • Reduce fee leverage • Lower coordination attack surface This is why block limits are not neutral. ⸻ 10/ Bottom line: Bitcoin’s failure mode is conditional permissionlessness. If you can be excluded when it matters most — during volatility, exits, or crisis — the system is not trustless. It’s discretionary. #BTC #BCH #BSV #Severe #vulnerability #CryptoNews #HighCalvin
6
5
2
8
1,771