BitHub

This cartoon makes me feel both proud and under tremendous pressure. I will never claim that OKX is absolutely safe or immune to attacks. No company can honestly make that promise. What I can say is that OKX has always treated security and the protection of customer assets as our highest priority. Our 13-year track record reflects more than a decade of continuous investment, engineering, operational discipline, and hard-earned experience. We take security threats seriously and professionally—not as a marketing opportunity. Behind the scenes, we have built extensive layers of proprietary technology, internal security systems, strategies, frameworks, penetration testing, and independent audits. Much of this infrastructure cannot be disclosed publicly for security reasons. But these capabilities are constantly being tested, challenged, and improved. Here’s something I can share: since the recent Binance security incident, the entire OKX team has been working just as hard and staying just as busy as the teams directly responding to the attack. Not because OKX was compromised. But because an attack on one major exchange is a warning to the entire industry. While some may see such moments as opportunities to launch promotional campaigns, generate traffic, or compete for market share, our priority has been different. Our teams have been working around the clock on four critical areas: 1. Tracking stolen funds in real time. Monitoring the movement of funds associated with the incident with second-level latency, identifying suspicious addresses and transactions, and taking available measures to prevent stolen funds from being laundered through OKX Exchange or our Web3 DEX aggregator. 2. Strengthening market risk controls. Assessing the potential market impact of the incident, tightening risk controls where necessary, and preparing for liquidity shocks or cascading liquidations that could threaten users and the broader market. 3. Analyzing emerging attack techniques. Studying the attack patterns, potential vulnerabilities, and methodologies involved, including threats to software development supply chains and the rapidly evolving security risks introduced by AI coding agents and their dependencies. 4. Challenging our own security assumptions. Using the lessons from this incident to conduct a fundamental review of our internal controls, access management, wallet infrastructure, and security architecture. We don’t assume that what protected us yesterday will necessarily protect us tomorrow. Security is never a finished project. It is a continuous responsibility that requires humility, vigilance, investment, and execution. We don’t choose to be the loudest when another company is under attack. We choose to work harder to protect our customers and strengthen the resilience of the entire industry. Competition should drive better products and services. Security should bring the industry together. Protecting customer assets is our first responsibility. And we will never take your trust for granted.

Wszystkie jak jeden mąż zaproponowały 3125 za dzień xD jeden Fiałek, nasz buntownik, 4000 xD Ps. Same baby. Kobiety na politechniki!!!11!!!1!1

I have absolutely no clue why these last couple cents are supposed to be this HARD for $STRC. Can someone please explain it to me, without being mean to me?

❌To była najdroższa rozmowa rekrutacyjna w historii.👨‍💼 Binance właśnie ujawniła (wstępnie) jak doszło do największego skoku na kasę w całej historii krypto. Wszystko zaczęło się od, jak podejrzewałem na samym początku, rozmowy o pracę. Wrzesień. Programista Binance dostaje wiadomość od „dyrektora projektu”. Rozmowa wideo z rzekomą osobą z działu kadr, profesjonalne materiały, wszystko wygląda elegancko. Potem przejście na komunikator i prośba: „pobierz zadanie rekrutacyjne”. Na służbowy komputer. W zadaniu ukryto wirusa, który wykorzystywał nieznaną nikomu wcześniej dziurę w zabezpieczeniach. Ochrona firmowych komputerów niczego nie wykryła. Wielki twist: hakerzy byli w firmie już wcześniej. W czerwcu zupełnie inny inżynier, odpowiedzialny za portfele giełdy, pobrał podrobioną wersję popularnego programu dla programistów. Ochrona to wyłapała i wymieniono mu laptopa. Bez znaczenia. Napastnicy wiedzieli już kogo szukać. W październiku dobrali się do jego nowego komputera. 29 października, 21:05. W 4 minuty z portfeli, z których giełda na bieżąco obsługuje wypłaty klientów, wypływa 233 mln XRP. Potem Solana, Optimism i 18 270 bitcoinów. Najbardziej absurdalny moment całej historii to fakt, że Binance wstrzymało wypłaty, a kradzież trwała jeszcze przez prawie 4 godziny. Mogli tylko się przyglądać. Jak to możliwe? Hakerzy wykorzystali funkcję Ethereum, która pozwala portfelowi oddać kontrolę nad przelewami zewnętrznemu programowi. Wszystko dzięki aktualizacji Pectra. Taka zgoda zapisuje się w samym blockchainie, a nie na serwerach giełdy. Binance mogło wyłączyć wszystkie swoje systemy, a program hakerów i tak nadal opróżniał portfel. Ostatni przelew wyszedł o godzinie 0:56 czasu polskiego. Dopiero o 1:10 giełda ostatecznie odebrała złodziejom uprawnienia. FBI przypisuje atak hakerom z Korei Północnej, z tej samej grupy, która od lat okrada branżę krypto i odpowiada za najbardziej śmiałe skoki. Pjongjang twierdzi, że to „polityczna prowokacja”. Na koniec liczba, która powinna dać każdemu do myślenia, szczególnie ludziom w branży. Tylko w tym roku Binance zatrzymało 57 prób ataków powiązanych z Koreą Północną. Przepuścili jedną. Ta jedna wystarczyła. Cały raport omawiamy szczegółowo tutaj: bithub.pl/kryptowaluty/binan…

🐞Biedronka przegrała przed sądem. Sąd ⚖️: świadomie wprowadzała w błąd w promocjach "zwrot 100% na voucher". Zapłaci karę 84 mln zł. Oszukani klienci 0 zł.

Comunicado oficial: Identificamos e contivemos com rapidez um incidente de segurança em um de nossos sistemas nesta madrugada. Reforçamos que: • Não houve nenhum prejuízo aos clientes; • Não houve vazamento de dados. Como medida preventiva de proteção, depósitos e saques estão temporariamente suspensos. Nossas equipes estão mobilizadas investigando o caso, rastreando os ativos e coordenando as medidas junto às autoridades competentes. Manteremos atualizações regulares por aqui.

Under pressure from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Trump administration may be within days of launching a nuclear strike on Iran. The target would be Pickax Mountain in central Iran, where Israeli intelligence claims the Iranian government has restarted its nuclear enrichment program. No conventional weapon in the American arsenal can penetrate 300 feet of solid granite to destroy the tunnels where enrichment is supposedly taking place. The only military option is a nuclear strike. Netanyahu has been pushing hard for one. “Bibi calls Trump about it every day,” says an informed observer. Netanyahu is cornered and desperate. After last week’s election results, he can’t form a government unless Trump intervenes directly in Israeli politics and brokers a deal with other parties that gives Netanyahu 61 seats in the Knesset. Otherwise, he is out as prime minister and on his way to ignominy, investigations and possibly jail. Netanyahu must stay close to Trump. He needs this war. To that end, he’s applied maximum pressure to his closest allies in the administration, including Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth and CENTCOM commander Brad Cooper. Both oppose a negotiated settlement to the war they’ve so grievously mismanaged; both are pushing to restart major combat operations. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and CIA director John Ratcliffe are also following Netanyahu’s lead, as are leaders of the Democratic Party. In a recent meeting on the subject, former president Barack Obama said he opposes the current Iran peace deal being drafted in Doha. The rest of America’s longtime allies in the Middle East are terrified by the prospect of more war. On September 27th, Netanyahu flew secretly to Abu Dhabi to enlist the UAE in his lobbying effort for a final attack on Iran. The Emiratis refused. After eight months of conflict, Gulf economies are teetering. So are global energy and fertilizer markets. They won’t recover soon. Globally, there are a total of about 850 supertankers used to transport oil from producers to the rest of the world. In October alone, 11 of them were badly damaged in Hormuz. At this pace, a global depression is imminent. A nuclear strike would radically accelerate the destruction. Fallout from a ground explosion at Pickax Mountain would contaminate the Persian Gulf, poisoning the water supply for 100 million people. And those are just some of the immediate consequences for the region. The rest of the world is every bit as exposed. No country other than the United States has ever used a nuclear weapon in war. Some would like to. An American nuclear attack on Iran would set a new precedent. The Russians have already told at least two other governments that an American nuclear strike on Iran would free them to use nuclear weapons against Ukraine. Pakistan and India would be tempted to do the same against each other, as would North Korea against Seoul. After the first nuclear strike, World War Three is inevitable. That war would be short and final. We’ve been sleepwalking toward this moment for months. Since February, the administration has quietly rewritten America’s nuclear doctrine to make first use of so-called “battlefield nukes” easier and therefore more likely. No one in Washington in either party seems bothered by this. Now we’re on the brink of it. Close observers say Trump is likely to decide by next weekend whether or not to use nuclear weapons. That would be November 7, six days from now. To his credit, he’s hesitating. At the moment, Trump is listening to his vice president, JD Vance, and to his envoy and friend Steve Witkoff, both of whom argue a deal with Iran can be made. They’re right, though it won’t be simple. The Iranians are famously frustrating to negotiate with under any circumstances, and elements of that government have become more radical since Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his family were killed in February. After decades of isolation, even relatively moderate Iranian leaders seem confused by how decisions are made in the West. (There is a widespread belief in Tehran, for example, that the United States government controls Israel.) But overall, people who have spoken to decision-makers in Iran say there is consensus there that more war is bad for everyone and a deal is worth making. One group that hasn’t been consulted so far is the global population — the hundreds of millions of people who will be killed along with their children if Trump is pushed by Netanyahu into launching a nuclear strike next week. Now would be the time for them to speak up.