The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief) header
The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief) profile picture

The Black Line Brief - Independent analysis. Hard truths. Exposing corruption and restoring accountability to the people.

Joined September 2016
Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)Photo by The Black Line Brief (@BlackLineBrief)
Come Watch Live - Dave Smith Confronts Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet and Jack Posobiec!!!! Dave Smith Calls Out TPUSA Over Thomas Massie—and It Gets Heated Ep. 322 youtube.com/live/wN_hu977G0M… via @YouTube
2
19
739
The Black Line Brief retweeted
Thank you all for the 2.5 million views on the handover episode with Baron. Today will be his first day filling in for me! Hope you guys enjoy. @baroncoleman youtube.com/live/3Cp9TwQM7cM…
907
1,255
61
19,184
1,117,747
Jeremy Boreing fancies himself a philosopher, an intellectual, and the smartest man in every room he enters. Unfortunately, his inflated sense of self-importance seems to far exceed his ability to represent someone else's arguments accurately. For someone who prides himself on intellectual superiority, you'd think accurately representing Candace Owens' actual words would be the bare minimum. Intellectual arrogance is not intellectual honesty, Jeremy. And condescension is no substitute for a sound argument.
I’m not even being funny but I think he should consider checking into a rehab clinic. He can’t even successfully recall what I’ve said or done anymore, yet he forces a conversation about it anyway, every episode. This is a man who needs a team of therapists, not a podcast. He’s trying to intellectualize an unhealthy obsession with a former work colleague, and he is unfortunately surrounded by people on his payroll who will never tell him it’s making him sick. It also appears to be taking a physical toll on him now too. I’ve honest to God never seen anything like this in the corporate world.
3
2
84
2,154
The Black Line Brief Community has been experiencing the exact same thing. It all started when we willfully, on our own accord choose to voice our actual opinion on the Shawn Ryan/Leah Files/Candace Owens situation.
I’ve never experienced anything like this before. This week my channel has basically been attacked with weird accounts, repeating phrases in the chat, and comments. Look at this fake account made in my name, 3 days ago, 100+ comments in my replies. My mods have been getting crushed this week. Must be over the target, as they say.
19
13
3
314
38,269
Josh, here’s the part you keep talking around: they gave the public a conclusion before they finished the investigation. They told us they had their guy. They presented the motive, the means, the opportunity—the whole story. Now, more than a year later, prosecutors are still checking with the agencies involved for evidence they may not have received. How much material is still outstanding, Josh? Which agencies have it? Why hasn’t it been turned over to the prosecution, let alone the defense? If the FBI, ATF, or any other agency still has evidence that hasn’t been provided, what exactly is taking so long? Is testing unfinished? Are there results that complicate the story we were told? Does any of that evidence point away from Tyler Robinson or contradict the state’s theory? Those are questions. I’m not claiming we already know the answers. That’s precisely why getting ALL the evidence matters. And here’s the bigger question: are investigators still following the evidence wherever it leads, or are they trying to make everything fit the conclusion officials already announced? You don’t get to dismiss that question by repeating the narrative being questioned. The prosecution can’t turn over material it hasn’t received. The defense can’t examine evidence it hasn’t been given. Their experts can’t independently evaluate results they haven’t seen. Yet you want to ridicule the time they’re asking for to do exactly that? They’re seeking the DEATH PENALTY, Josh. Public confidence from the FBI and Governor Cox doesn’t replace complete disclosure and independent scrutiny. If this case is as solid as you insist, then you should want every relevant piece of evidence produced and tested. So explain the gap between the certainty they sold the public and the work they’re apparently still doing. Calling everyone else ignorant doesn’t answer it.
What bs are the conspiratards going to spin this into? 🤣
6
6
78
2,042
The Black Line Brief retweeted
Replying to @leahfiles
“Can’t stop talking about me on here”. 😂 Okay Done! Glad you suddenly now have the equipment that you just told everyone didn’t anymore. Send your email via DM. We will get it set up. For the record (and to state my biases up front) based on my dm convo with you, I believe you are a pathological liar. You lied on me. You lied on Shawn’s editor by claiming he quit in support of you (failing to mention to the public that said editor BLOCKED your number before I ever reached out to him) and you tried to encourage him to secretly record me. All that said, I am open to being proven wrong and will keep it respectful regarding the multitude of topics that you claim to be an expert on and the things you’ve said publicly. Also please bring your promised “deep dive” research into my family. Bring it all :-)
608
449
66
10,406
391,261
I agree with Zach and Drey. This is exactly what I found as well and I stand by my criticism. In the substack material I reviewed, I found publicly available information and research other people had already published, compiled into polished Substack articles. I didn’t find the original discoveries that would justify the level of investigative expertise being presented. My assessment is that this looks like AI-assisted repackaging. Nice formatting, charts, and intelligence jargon can make an article look impressive. They don’t demonstrate that the person publishing it understands the material. That’s why Zach’s point about the Shawn Ryan interview matters. In my view, there was a clear disconnect between the sophistication of her written presentation and her ability to explain the underlying subjects when questioned. I support independent researchers. That support comes with the same expectations I have for anyone else: understand your claims, credit your sources, and explain what you actually uncovered yourself. Charging for a compilation doesn’t turn it into an original investigation. And asking someone to demonstrate their expertise is completely fair.
Leah Files should’ve just been quiet about the Shawn Ryan interview. She could've just chalked it up as a loss and moved on. This whole thing caused people to take a closer look at her work, now everyone knows it’s just nicely packaged AI slop. It's a facade, and when you scratch the surface and dig into the details, there just really isn't much there. In my very first breakdown of the interview I stated that there was a disconnect between her Substack presentation and how she presented herself on Shawn Ryan. She was not able to communicate about the topics in any level of detail. We now know why... When you handwrite things, edit them yourself, put together your own charts, and take the time to understand the details and learn, you can communicate about them. There is no substitute to actually doing the work. A lesson for everyone in this age of AI. I have the same issue with Erika Kirk and Katie Zacharia. A nicely packaged, dishonestly marketed, inauthentic facade leveraged to gain a platform and attention. I'm about done with this topic, I've said my piece on it, and I'll accept the apologies from those who said I was bought and paid for expressing my correct opinion and observations on the matter.
12
16
1
294
5,796
The Black Line Brief retweeted
I believe in independent media. We need more independent researchers and more independent voices, which is why I’ll always root for people doing this work outside the big outlets. That being said, the people doing this work have to genuinely care about the information they put out and about the people receiving it. Otherwise we’re no better than the media conglomerates people come to us to escape. The Leah Files just sent her midterm predictions to more than 41,000 subscribers, and I’m one of them. As I read through the post, I couldn’t help but notice her numbers were dramatically different from what I’d seen in the FEC filings this week. Her post is missing more than half of James Talarico’s fundraising. It ends by telling readers to look up everything on their ballot at her funding guide before they vote, and that guide says Maine’s Democratic Senate nominee “has reported raising nothing” when the FEC shows he’s raised $26.9 million. On top of that, her maps are missing states. New York and Rhode Island are gone, and “RC” isn’t a real state. They also list people who aren’t on the ballot. Oklahoma says “Nuzzell,” who isn’t running, and Florida says DeSantis, who’s term-limited. Indiana doesn’t even have a governor’s race this year, and it says “Britzker.” That’s especially dangerous with early voting already underway. When I asked her about it, she said it was published a few weeks ago, even though the post was only two hours old at the time. Then my note correcting her numbers was gone. And look, nobody expects any of us to be perfect. Digging through all of these files and keeping everything straight in your head is a really tough job, and I get that more than anyone. But telling your readers to use a website you made before they vote, when it’s full of outdated and wrong numbers, is where I draw the line. If independent media is going to be better than the outlets we’re pushing against, we have to get the facts right. FEC, Talarico fec.gov/data/candidate/S6TX0… FEC, Jackson fec.gov/data/candidate/S6ME0…
265
427
101
2,874
174,915
BLB family, please keep me in your prayers. I had a big scare with my heart this morning and have spent all day at the hospital getting tests done on my heart, lungs, blood, and more. Still waiting for answers, but I’d really appreciate your prayers. Love you all, and thank you for the support. God bless. 🙏
89
12
4
394
6,610
The Black Line Brief retweeted
I’m tired of hearing, “No one has disputed Leahfiles’ research.” It isn't true.
Real facts can paint a false picture when the comparisons are wrong. I investigated the claims against Glacier, compared them with its competitors, and examined the evidence. What I found tells a different story.
12
26
2
163
3,559
The Black Line Brief retweeted
Hey @leahfiles I’ll pass on your offer to have a private conversation but you’re welcome to come on my podcast to lay out all of your information. Not only will I not muzzle you with a pre interview I don’t want to talk to you at all before the interview. I will ask you straight forward questions and you can go on and on and on if you want. I will have follow up questions tho and you will have to actually know what a dollar is. 1 I make zero money from any clicks so you can’t pretend I’m doing this for money 2 I moved to Idaho to live on a farm years ago so it won’t be easy to claim I want notoriety or fame from you 3 if you’re so passionate about revealing this info, me being “unhinged” or “full of hate” shouldn’t matter 4 you can cut up that interview for your tiktok and keep all the money. My clips do extremely well on tiktok. I’m what people call “engaging,” Deal? Or do I need to run this by your agent Dr penis @realstewpeters
169
140
10
2,461
78,746
The Black Line Brief retweeted
Leah Files has said consistently she was muzzled by a Shawn Ryan producer within 30 minutes of the show taking place. Ana claims here that this happened the night before. There is apparently evidence of this taking place, which we are told will not be released to protect those who have already been named publicly. Which one is it? This is a big claim against Shawn Ryan. Inconsistencies like this cause people to question whether the claims are legitimate. The names have already been named, just drop the evidence.
136
37
4
558
27,972
BIBLEin365 and Real America’s Voice News—their all-in-one app disclose data collection in their app-store privacy information. BOTH deserve scrutiny. BIBLEin365’s Android disclosure lists location, personal information, and other data, plus third-party sharing of certain data. Real America’s Voice News’s iPhone disclosure lists precise location, contact information, device identifiers, and usage data, along with diagnostics used for tracking. What gets collected from each user depends on permissions and app usage—but these data disclosures are there for people to read. What information are you collecting? Who receives it? How is it used? And does Superfeed, whose reported directors include Lori Frantzve, have any involvement in either app’s technology or data operations? If so, disclose it. Faith and patriotism do NOT put BIBLEin365 or Real America’s Voice News above accountability.
Replying to @NihiloX
Also from Erika Kirk's app. LOL.
2
3
34
1,247
This is DISGUSTING. Watch the Video: “NIGHT TO HONOR ISRAEL.” Federal Judge Roy Altman says he’s taken roughly 10% of America’s active federal judges on trips to Israel in just three years. The accompanying post also quotes him describing state supreme court justices playing Rock, Paper, Scissors to decide who gets to go. Who funds these trips? Which judges participated? Who do they meet with? What benefits are accepted, and where are the disclosures? As a Marine veteran, I find this infuriating. Judicial independence and public trust deserve serious protection. Americans deserve answers about these trips and any potential conflicts of interest. Your oath is to the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Act like it. AMERICA FIRST. Including our courts. instagram.com/reel/De8T9opKd…
2
2
21
886
Congrats to @iamcoachcolin and @baroncoleman on 4 years of sobriety! I just celebrated 8 years sober in August!! “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me! - Philippians 4:13
Appreciate it! God is good all the time, all things are possible through Christ ✝️✝️✝️
15
10
373
6,408
The Black Line Brief retweeted
Something I've noticed time and time again... Accounts allegedly pretending to be someone's followers will slowly start planting doubt about a creator, for example. They'll dig up an old story about them or purposely "misunderstand" something the creator said, then publish a post expressing their disappointment. It happens slowly, with multiple accounts doing the same thing. Suddenly, people start questioning that creator's character and intentions. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, these accounts become outraged over one particular thing the creator supposedly said. Even though the creator didn't actually say it the way they're presenting it, their interpretation becomes louder than the actual substance of what was said. They take over comment sections, live chats, and timelines. Posts about the controversy start appearing EVERYWHERE. And they're so convincing that their talking points begin to infect the real fan base. The doubt has been planted. Now the actual followers start joining in the outrage. Meanwhile, the accounts that started it all double down, increasing the number of posts, comments, and accusations. Suddenly, the creator's credibility is shaken. And no matter what they say or don't say, hundreds of these accounts will jump in with the same arguments, twisting their words, dismissing their explanations, and making sure the outrage never dies down. But here's the clever part. These accounts aren't presenting themselves as haters. They're pretending to be "loyal fans who used to love this person but are now so disappointed that they can no longer support them." And that's what makes it so effective. Because when genuine followers see what appears to be hundreds of other fans turning against someone, they start wondering whether they should feel the same way. Let me give you an example. I recently noticed an account repeatedly commenting under one of my posts, desperately trying to spark outrage over a controversial topic that day. The person was attacking a creator they claimed they "used to follow" but now absolutely hated because they were supposedly a liar. Something about it caught my attention, so I checked their profile. And surprise, surprise... Almost 200 posts and comments in ONE DAY. All about that ONE creator. One person. One day. Almost 200 interactions dedicated to attacking the same individual. Now, does that automatically prove the account was fake or part of some coordinated operation? No. But it's exactly the kind of behavior that makes me question whether I'm looking at genuine disappointment or someone deliberately trying to manufacture outrage. And when you see multiple accounts behaving in a similar way, repeating the same talking points, using the same interpretations, and presenting themselves as former supporters, it's worth paying attention. Because sometimes what looks like a spontaneous wave of public outrage might not be nearly as spontaneous as you think. My advice? Learn to recognize when this might be happening. Don't immediately jump on the outrage bandwagon just because your timeline is suddenly full of people telling you how disappointed you should be. Go back and listen to what the person ACTUALLY said. Not someone's interpretation of it. Not a conveniently edited clip. Not an emotional post from a stranger claiming to be a former fan. Take some time to think for yourself, question what you're being shown, and keep your distance from the mob mentality. Because once someone successfully plants doubt in your mind, it's incredibly easy to start interpreting everything that person says or does through that doubt. And sometimes, that's exactly the point. (These are my thoughts and observations - I'm not stating anything as a fact)
104
85
19
812
17,109