If youโre exploring @primus_labs, hereโs something worth knowing about its reputation system. ๐
Your reputation grows through XPs, which you earn by completing and verifying records on the platform.
Hereโs how to get started:
- Visit s.kaito.ai/PyXPv2r
- Connect your wallet.
- Download the Chrome extension on desktop.
- Complete the available attestation tasks.
Each verified task adds to your Primus reputation score in the app.
I initially received 10 XPs per task, but after verifying them again, I received 4 each. Rewards may vary as the tasks or system change.
So, what can you verify?
Agentic Era
โ PnL records from Polymarket, FOMO and Hyperliquid
โ AI usage from OpenAI, MiniMax, DeepSeek and Cursor
โ Trading activity from Binance, Bybit, OKX and Bitget
There are also two other categories:
โ Identity Profile
โ Platform Activities
The tasks use Primus zkTLS technology to verify information from supported platforms while helping protect the underlying data.
The more you explore, the more youโll understand how Primus is building around verifiable data and privacy.
Have you checked your XPs yet? ๐
If youโre exploring @primus_labs, hereโs something worth knowing about its reputation system. ๐
Your reputation grows through XPs, which you earn by completing and verifying records on the platform.
Hereโs how to get started:
- Visit s.kaito.ai/PyXPv2r
- Connect your wallet.
- Download the Chrome extension on desktop.
- Complete the available attestation tasks.
Each verified task adds to your Primus reputation score in the app.
I initially received 10 XPs per task, but after verifying them again, I received 4 each. Rewards may vary as the tasks or system change.
So, what can you verify?
Agentic Era
โ PnL records from Polymarket, FOMO and Hyperliquid
โ AI usage from OpenAI, MiniMax, DeepSeek and Cursor
โ Trading activity from Binance, Bybit, OKX and Bitget
There are also two other categories:
โ Identity Profile
โ Platform Activities
The tasks use Primus zkTLS technology to verify information from supported platforms while helping protect the underlying data.
The more you explore, the more youโll understand how Primus is building around verifiable data and privacy.
Have you checked your XPs yet? ๐
Crypto security isnโt just about protecting our assets today. Itโs also about preparing for threats that could emerge tomorrow.
Thatโs one reason I find @Starknetโs approach to account flexibility interesting, especially with quantum computing advancing.
Think about how wallets work. We rely on cryptographic signatures to approve transactions, but what happens if the methods we use today eventually become vulnerable?
Starknetโs programmable accounts offer an interesting path forward.
Instead of locking every account into one signature scheme, developers can build support for different authorization methods at the account level.
There are two things worth separating here:
โ Signatures determine whether a transaction is authorized.
โ STARK proofs provide cryptographic evidence that computations were performed correctly.
They solve different problems, so changing an accountโs signature method doesnโt automatically require replacing the proving system.
Of course, Starknet isnโt fully quantum resistant today. Ethereum dependencies and other parts of the stack still need consideration.
But preparing for future cryptographic changes before they become urgent is a smart move.
We donโt know exactly what tomorrowโs threats will look like. Building systems that can adapt could make all the difference.
Explore the research ๐
quantum.starkware.co
Crypto security isnโt just about protecting our assets today. Itโs also about preparing for threats that could emerge tomorrow.
Thatโs one reason I find @Starknetโs approach to account flexibility interesting, especially with quantum computing advancing.
Think about how wallets work. We rely on cryptographic signatures to approve transactions, but what happens if the methods we use today eventually become vulnerable?
Starknetโs programmable accounts offer an interesting path forward.
Instead of locking every account into one signature scheme, developers can build support for different authorization methods at the account level.
There are two things worth separating here:
โ Signatures determine whether a transaction is authorized.
โ STARK proofs provide cryptographic evidence that computations were performed correctly.
They solve different problems, so changing an accountโs signature method doesnโt automatically require replacing the proving system.
Of course, Starknet isnโt fully quantum resistant today. Ethereum dependencies and other parts of the stack still need consideration.
But preparing for future cryptographic changes before they become urgent is a smart move.
We donโt know exactly what tomorrowโs threats will look like. Building systems that can adapt could make all the difference.
Explore the research ๐
quantum.starkware.co
BLAZE retweeted
prediction markets traded $116b in contracts over the last 30 days @Kalshi alone grew 60%.
so when people say prediction market volume is falling, they are really talking about one exchange.
polymarket's international exchange traded $11.3b in june.
it traded $4.7b in september. its share of tracked volume went from about 59% in august 2025 to under 4% last week.
Get this, polymarket international has traded between $1.0b and $1.25b every week since early august.
it stopped shrinking months ago, and everyone else kept growing around it.
so why did it drop in the first place? four things line up with the timing.
>the world cup ended.
june was its biggest month since tracking began in august 2025, and the tournament ran from june 11 to july 19.
>trading stopped being free.
polymarket added taker fees to crypto markets in january, to sports in february, and to almost every other category on march 30.
>us traders got their own app.
polymarket us traded $13.5b in the last 30 days, up 94%, and 98% of it was sports.
>sports moved to regulated apps.
draftkings predictions and novig both more than doubled their volume in the last 30 days.
if you add both polymarket exchanges together, they traded $18.1b in contracts over the last 30 days
that is more than the $15.4b they traded together in june.
the volume did not disappear,
it moved to regulated us apps.
is the crypto version of prediction markets turning into a niche product, or is this just a reshuffle
Curious to hear your thoughts
BLAZE retweeted
๐ง๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ต๐ผ๐น๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด.๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐บ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐น๐ฑ ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฒ๐พ๐๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐๐น๐ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป.
I spent some time researching the latest development from @pendle_fi, and what caught my attention wasn't just the leverage. It was how three pieces of financial infrastructure are now working together on Base.
On October 22, Pendle introduced PendleLoop, allowing eligible users to build leveraged positions in tokenized US equities through @aave V4.
The supported assets include:
โข AAPLc โ Apple
โข NVDAc โ Nvidia
โข GOOGLc โ Alphabet
โข TSLAc โ Tesla
โข AMZNc โ Amazon
โข MSFTc โ Microsoft
โข METAc โ Meta
Here's what I found.
โ ๐๐ถ๐ฟ๐๐, ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ด๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ?
@aave already introduced lending markets for these equities in September.
@pendle_fi didn't create a new lending market. It built an interface that combines the transactions required to increase exposure.
Instead of manually buying tokens, supplying collateral, borrowing and repeating the process, users can manage the position through PendleLoop.
The mechanism works like this:
โ Purchase a tokenized stock.
โ Supply the tokens as collateral on $Aave V4.
โ Borrow $USDC against that collateral.
โ Use the borrowed $USDC to purchase additional stock tokens.
โ Repeat within the permitted collateral limits.
The result is a larger equity position than the capital initially committed.
At launch, available leverage ranged from approximately 2.6x to 4.2x, depending on the asset.
But leverage isn't free. Borrowing rates are variable, and a decline in collateral value can trigger liquidation.
โ ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ๐?
This is another detail worth understanding.
@coinbase Tokenized Stocks aren't simply synthetic assets following equity prices.
Each token represents a certificate issued by Coinbase Onchain SPV Ltd, with underlying shares held through Alpaca Securities (an SEC-registered broker-dealer).
The issuer holds those shares under a trust arrangement for token holders.
Corporate actions are also accounted for.
For example:
Dividends are reinvested into additional underlying shares (after applicable fees and taxes),rather than distributed directly to token holders.
This means the tokens provide economic exposure to the underlying equities, although their legal rights and redemption arrangements differ from holding ordinary shares through a brokerage account.
โ ๐ก๐ผ๐, ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฒ๐?
Aave V4's Equities Hub on @base supports the seven stocks as collateral for USDC borrowing.
At launch, the market had approximately:
โข $29M in aggregate equity collateral caps.
โข $32M USDC supply cap.
โข $21M USDC borrow cap.
โข Collateral factors ranging from 65% to 79%.
These are market limits, not actual deposits or borrowing volume.
And the collateral factors matter because they determine how much borrowing capacity each asset receives.
A token with a lower collateral factor generally requires more collateral for the same loan.
This also explains why PendleLoop cannot offer identical leverage across every stock.
โ ๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฃ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฑ๐น๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐ฝ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐?
Pendle is currently waiving its service fees on eligible non-PT looping positions until December 31, 2026.
However, that doesn't eliminate the cost of leverage.
Users still face:
โข Variable USDC borrowing interest
โข Transaction costs and slippage
โข Liquidation risk when collateral values decline
Pendle has also announced borrowing incentives distributed through @Merkl_xyz.
Those incentives can reduce effective financing costs for qualifying positions, but they shouldn't be treated as permanent income.
โ ๐ข๐ป๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ธ ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
The lending market operates 24/7, but the underlying US stock market doesn't.
Aave uses Chainlink's tokenized equity price feeds, which publish prices 24/5.
During weekends and US market holidays, the feeds retain their last published prices.
That creates a pricing gap:
โข A stock could experience a major development outside regular market hours
โข while its onchain collateral valuation remains unchanged until the feed updates.
For leveraged positions, a sharp repricing when the feed resumes can become a liquidation problem.
So 24/7 access doesn't mean continuous price discovery or protection from market gaps.
โฆ Conclusion
What I find significant is how the responsibilities are divided:
โ @coinbase handles the tokenized equity structure.
โ @aave provides the collateral and borrowing infrastructure.
โ @pendle_fi makes the transactions accessible through one interface.
Each component existed before this integration, but combining them reduces the work required to use tokenized equities in DeFi. And I think that distinction matters.
Issuing more tokenized stocks doesn't necessarily create more demand for them. The stronger test is whether holders are willing to supply those assets as collateral, borrow against them, and maintain positions after promotional incentives expire.
That's what I'll be monitoring:
โธ collateral deposits
โธ actual borrowing demand
โธ utilization
โธ how these markets behave during periods of equity volatility
Because the ability to tokenize a stock has already been demonstrated. Whether that stock can support a liquid, sustainable lending market is the more important question.
BLAZE retweeted
Last week I wrote about @RomeProtocol bringing Ethereum apps inside Solana. Did some more digging since then ๐...
Two things stood out.
๐Solana's Alpenglow upgrade just went live and because Rome runs natively inside Solana, every EVM transaction on @RomeProtocol now settles basically instantly ( Ethereum's tools, Solana's speed, no extra work needed!)
๐And it's not just theory. With Portus, people on Base and Polygon can already put their USDC to work in Kamino on Solana while signing on their own chain. They never even leave.
That's the part I liked most fam, not just another bridge you have to trust, but two worlds actually sharing the same market.
Rome wasn't built in a day, but it's coming together fast . Watching it closely and will keep you posted about their next steps!๐๏ธ
Been keeping an eye on @RomeProtocol lately, and Portus is a pretty good example of why.
It started with Base, and now Polygon users can access Kamino lending on Solana too.
You can deposit USDC from your own chain, while Rome handles the interaction with Solana behind the scenes. Withdrawals even return to the same address.
This is where the whole โEVM inside Solanaโ idea starts to make sense to me.
Less about which chain you're using, more about what you can actually do with it.
Curious to see what they build next. ๐๏ธ
Tokenizing real world assets is one thing. Getting that capital to actually work in DeFi is another.
The latest RWA figures make that gap hard to ignore.
Hereโs what stands out:
$34.44B in total onchain RWA AUM
$31.16B in active AUM
$4.33B deployed across DeFi
$19.82B in RWA perp open interest
$47.50B in daily RWA trading volume
Only around 13.9% of active RWA capital is currently deployed in DeFi.
And most of that activity is concentrated in a handful of protocols:
โ @Morpho Blue: $768.1M
โ @Kamino Lend: $423.1M
โ @Aave V3: $417.2M
โ @grovedotfinance: $394.7M
โ @pendle_fi V2: $351.5M
Together, they account for roughly $2.35B, more than half of the reported DeFi deployment.
Meanwhile, RWA perpetuals are attracting significant trading activity, with open interest approaching $20B.
These numbers measure different things, so they arenโt directly comparable. But they highlight an interesting trend: leveraged trading is growing alongside tokenization, while lending, collateral use, and yield opportunities still have room to expand.
Of course, not every tokenized asset can be freely used in DeFi. Regulatory restrictions, liquidity, and collateral eligibility all matter.
Still, the opportunity is worth watching.
The next big RWA opportunity may not be about who tokenizes the most assets.
It may be about which protocols make those assets genuinely useful across onchain financial markets.
Tokenizing real world assets is one thing. Getting that capital to actually work in DeFi is another.
The latest RWA figures make that gap hard to ignore.
Hereโs what stands out:
$34.44B in total onchain RWA AUM
$31.16B in active AUM
$4.33B deployed across DeFi
$19.82B in RWA perp open interest
$47.50B in daily RWA trading volume
Only around 13.9% of active RWA capital is currently deployed in DeFi.
And most of that activity is concentrated in a handful of protocols:
โ @Morpho Blue: $768.1M
โ @Kamino Lend: $423.1M
โ @Aave V3: $417.2M
โ @grovedotfinance: $394.7M
โ @pendle_fi V2: $351.5M
Together, they account for roughly $2.35B, more than half of the reported DeFi deployment.
Meanwhile, RWA perpetuals are attracting significant trading activity, with open interest approaching $20B.
These numbers measure different things, so they arenโt directly comparable. But they highlight an interesting trend: leveraged trading is growing alongside tokenization, while lending, collateral use, and yield opportunities still have room to expand.
Of course, not every tokenized asset can be freely used in DeFi. Regulatory restrictions, liquidity, and collateral eligibility all matter.
Still, the opportunity is worth watching.
The next big RWA opportunity may not be about who tokenizes the most assets.
It may be about which protocols make those assets genuinely useful across onchain financial markets.
BLAZE retweeted
Been off X for a month. Had to take care of a few things and spend some time learning and figuring life.
Now I'm back on the timeline.
More building.
More of me.
More learning.
Still growing. Still figuring it out. Still hungry for more.
We're not starting over. We're picking up where we left off. ๐ฆ
BLAZE retweeted
$GRVT has burned 1.1M tokens, nearly 1% of its circulating supply.
But the burn isnโt the main story.
@grvt_io is building toward something bigger: one self-custodial balance where users can earn yield and trade across markets without leaving capital idle.
Earn, Stable Funding Perps, and Yield as Margin are all pieces of that plan.
The token mechanism and the product roadmap now sit beside each other. But the real test is whether the products attract sustained users and meaningful activity.
A burn can reduce supply. It canโt manufacture demand.
GRVTโs next chapter will be judged by adoption, not announcements.
Daily leaderboard on KICKFLIP. top 3 get paid every day.
flying cars are here. landing is still in beta.
Tried @PeergameEng new game. So fun, but I got greedy ๐
Reached 7.84, went for one more jump and lost it all. Shouldโve cashed out, right?
Play here ๐
peergame.com/?campaignCode=0โฆ
18+ only. Play responsibly.
๐ค Paid partnership
AI agents don't have to stay as tools
A specialized agent can become a service that other agents or users can actually hire
Developers can build an agent for a specific task but that capability needs somewhere to be discovered and used
That's where agent.family fits into the @termix_ai ecosystem
An agent can list its service, get discovered, take jobs, deliver the work and get paid
I think this creates an interesting path for monetization
Instead of keeping an agent inside one application, its capability can become a service available to potential clients
agent.family/r/PPFSAXCZ
Could specialized agents become a new kind of API economy?
BLAZE retweeted
Yoooo,
Just got approved as a Wired Creator!๐
Honestly, this feels great. I love creating content, sharing my thoughts, and connecting with people across Web3.
Excited for whatโs next. More to come๐ซก
creatorwire.xyz
.@grvt_io idle margin math, $10k for a month:
most perp venues: $0
3% bank: ~$25
grvt: up to 11% apy on eligible assets (~$90), potentially while it still backs your trades
institutional fixed income, a $160t+ market, going onchain. your keys.
margin shouldn't work for free.
























