Boshanks69 (@Boshanko) profile picture

Following all things SAFC. Into old-style Lambrettas & Vespas.

Joined November 2011
Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)Photo by Boshanks69 (@Boshanko)
Boshanks69 retweeted
Why were Jonathan Powell, Peter Mandelson and Lord Hermer appointed without vetting? The answer is that Chagos was a deal Starmer couldn't refuse to make. Here's a timeline of the key stages of the Chagos treachery. In 1982, after it became known that the Chagos seabed may contain vast mineral wealth, Mauritius set up a select committee to examine the matter. However, sea-mining technology was in its infancy, and it was too expensive to be commercially viable at that time. In 2003, as underwater mining technologies advanced and the value of minerals and rare earth elements soared, mining the Chagos seabed became an exciting possibility again; Mauritius appointed the eminent international barrister Sir Ian Brownlie as advisor for the Chagos Archipelago. A former member of the Communist Party of Great Britain, Brownlie was a good friend of Sir Satcam Boolell, a former Labour deputy prime minister of Mauritius, and High Commissioner in London. In 2009, Brownlie led the first Mauritius delegation to the Foreign Office in London seeking a Chagos deal. Among the delegation was Sir Satcam Boolell's son Satyajit, who became Mauritius Director of Public Prosecutions the same year. In 2010, after Brownlie died in a motor accident in Egypt, Sir Keir Starmer’s “great mate”, Philippe Sands, a leading human-rights lawyer who has publicly boasted of humiliating the UK in international courts, took over as counsel to Mauritius for Chagos. In 2013, Satyajit Boolell invited Keir Starmer, whom he had become friendly with during Starmer's time as the UK's DPP, to a legal conference at the 5-star Balaclava resort in Mauritius. During the trip, Starmer discussed the future of the Chagos Archipelago with then Mauritius prime minister Navin Ramgoolam. After Starmer’s 2013 visit, Ramgoolam wrote that he and Starmer were aligned over Chagos. In 2015, Ramgoolam was arrested on money-laundering charges when large sums of cash in foreign currencies, suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches, and blank British visas were found in his home. Also in 2015, Starmer was elected to the British Parliament. In 2019, Philippe Sands, after a campaign of lobbying the UN, obtained an International Court of Justice ruling (advisory opinion only, and non-binding) that the Chagos islands should be given to Mauritius. Sands used the ICJ ruling as leverage in the following years in his efforts to persuade the Conservative government to give Chagos to Mauritius. In 2020, Starmer became leader of the Labour Party. In 2021, Sands received Mauritius' top honour, The Most Distinguished Order of the Star and Key of the Indian Ocean. In 2022, Sands made an unauthorized entry into the Chagos Archipelago for a flag-raising ceremony. Sands tweets at the time, “It’s morning on Chagos, where the flag of Mauritius flies." In 2023, Sands became a Mauritius citizen, but retains his British and French citizenships. 🧧In November 2023, David Cameron replaced James Cleverly as Foreign Secretary and, with the support of other senior Tories, stopped a Chagos deal saying, it’s not in the national interest, as reported in Hansard. In July 2024, Starmer became UK Prime Minister and just ten weeks after entering Downing Street, he agreed a deal with Mauritius, despite there having been no mention of Chagos during the election campaign, and the Labour manifesto pledging to protect the BOT. in November of 2024, Ramgoolam was elected Mauritius prime minister again after a snap general election, and took over from the incumbent PM, Pravind Jugnauth, to lead the Chagos negotiations with the UK. In December 2024, after 14 years in the role, Philippe Sands steps down as Mauritius counsel for Chagos. In January 2025, Attorney General Lord Hermer recused himself from signing off on the Chagos deal, and declined to say why. In February 2025, Jugnauth was arrested on money-laundering charges after large sums of cash in foreign currencies and suitcases full of brand-new luxury watches were found in his home. In May 2025, twelve years after discussing the future of Chagos in Mauritius, Starmer and Ramgoolam sat down in London to sign the treaty that transfers the archipelago's sovereignty to Mauritius. The Fall Out. The Chagos deal does🟥NOT secure the joint UK/US military base on Diego Garcia. The deal operationally hobbles the base, and increases the dangers to the British and American military personnel, and the civilians who work there, and in the wider Central Indian Ocean region. Diego Garcia's remoteness made it easy to defend in the past. This deal leaves the base horribly vulnerable to the growing threats posed by the new longer-range missiles, and more sophisticated and lethal drones. When Keir Starmer, Lord Hermer and Vijay Rangarajan, the Director General at the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, made the deal it was fully understood that the outer islands of the Chagos Archipelago were by far the best locations to deploy early warning, and air-defense systems, to protect the main base from missile and drone attacks. Yet they still decided to lease only Diego Garcia. Andy Burnham, Foreign Secretary Ed Miliband, and Defense Minister Wes Streeting, know the deal increases the dangers to the lives of British service personnel, and our NATO allies personnel, in the strategically important Central Indian Ocean region. To double down and push the deal with that knowledge is a shameful act of betrayal. While the deal leaves Diego Garcia vulnerable to attack, it also renders the base itself ineffective and operationally hobbled. Mauritius is a signatory of the Pelindaba African Weapon-Free Zone Treaty which bans all nuclear weapons from treaty members' territory. Pelindaba gives each of the more the 40 countries who have signed it the right to inspect the facilities on Diego Garcia if they suspect nuclear arms are being stored there. The UK's nuclear-armed Trident submarines will no longer be able to enter Chagos waters, or visit Diego Garcia which is the only island in the region which has suitable anchorage and facilities for maintenance and restocking provisions, etc. The US's nuclear-armed submarines, ships, and planes will also be banned from Diego Garcia and the Chagos Archipelago's waters. Mauritius gets complete sovereignty over everything, including control of the airspace above the Chagos Archipelago, which at 250,000 square miles is the same size as France. The implications of controlling such a vast area of airspace in a strategically vital region are huge. Mauritius has shown it will ban planes entering its current airspace when China asks. The Chagos Deal does not ‘secure the base’. It methodically destroys every element required for operations. The text and annexes state it will: ❌Constrain future Ops and use of the base ❌Prevent the placing of sensors and other maritime installations ❌Require us to sight our foes on defence planning ❌Mean we’re unable to use our preferred contractors ❌See us lose of control over electromagnetic spectrum.
81
833
78
1,820
52,759
🤬🤬🤬A 12 year old child was arrested by #Merseyside #Police in #Netherton on 27th July 2026 after a phone call was made to Police with a false report of a burglary. The 12 year old child and his family who are Polish, have lived in their house for six years. A few months ago a Nigerian family who have just moved to the UK were allocated a house in the street. The family were very hospitable with them, supported them and offered them food. One of their children, a 13 year old we will call Sean, began entering the family’s home and took things that did not belong to him the child’s father claims. Despite this the family continued to allow Sean to come to their home and play with their children. On 26th July 2026, the family went Alton Towers for the 12 year old child’s birthday and they took Sean with them. On the way home they stopped at the services. When they continued their journey, Sean revealed that he had stole some sweets and chewing gum. The 12 year old child’s father was not happy with this and told Sean never to come to his house again. The next day, Sean and his mother came to the family’s house and accused the father of racist discrimination. The father again told them to leave and not to come back. Thirty minutes later, Police Officer 1301 turned up. The Officer would not let the 12 year old’s mum listen to what he was saying to her son, pushed her away a number of times and eventually handcuffed her. The 12 year old child was taken to the patrol car. He was barefoot. The officer refused to allow him to put on shoes or socks. Additional police cars arrived at the scene, and ultimately, around 10–12 officers were involved in the intervention. British neighbours came out into the street to defend the Polish family. Finally, an armed police unit arrived. The officers were carrying firearms, even though children were present. "I didn't know what was going on. I was genuinely afraid during the incident” recalls the father. The 12 year old child was taken away by Police with no information as to where he was being taken. His father tried to follow, but Police blocked his car. He then went with a neighbour in his car, but Police stopped that and did a full search of the vehicle. According to his father, the 12 year old child said that one of the officers had twisted his arm. "The officer with badge number 1301 twisted my son’s arm so hard that he broke his wrist.” The father claims to possess several recordings documenting the entire course of the incident. “I have four other videos as well. I have every single second of the intervention recorded," he says. The family have instructed a Solicitor
382
1,998
151
6,167
117,972
Don’t know the context here or what the old chap is doing, but you think Lancashire police would have done this to a black or brown man? Fucking no chance
261
609
53
1,776
62,162
Boshanks69 retweeted
🚨 THIS IS HOW YOU DEAL WITH THE RADICAL MOB. An anti-Semitic mob tried to blockade the Maersk headquarters in Copenhagen to disrupt critical maritime infrastructure. Danish police showed absolutely zero tolerance. They moved in, restored public order, and shut the mob down. European cities need to stop negotiating with these radicals and start clearing them out. RT to show the world how it is done. 🔄
2,056
5,890
542
26,919
473,004
Boshanks69 retweeted
Yes. Let’s discuss this cunt and her mother.
7
1
29
1,366
Boshanks69 retweeted
Bridget Phillipson is a UK Labour MP and the Secretary of State for Education. On her own website she says: “Before becoming an MP, Bridget managed a refuge for women and children fleeing domestic violence.” That refuge was her mother’s charity. While she was there, public money was awarded for a hostel that was never publicly evidenced as built. Here’s the paper trail. 🧵
74
974
93
2,018
78,904
Supreme Leader Baby Trump Addresses the Iran Situation! 🤣🇺🇸 @BabyNetworkNews
561
4,167
496
14,391
590,080
This is ridiculous. Why doesn’t the driver just get out of the car and walk without needing to be rescued with a rope? So much unnecessary drama going on here. And a waste of time for the fire and rescue service.
1,557
501
166
4,992
1,520,219
Hi there! This month, I’m cycling 300 miles for Dementia UK – a cause close to my heart. I’d love your support to help more families facing dementia. Thank you! fundraise.dementiauk.org/s/7…
7
537
$33 million from BRITISH TAX PAYERS was given to this failing charity for refugees, full story in The Mail
66
348
13
641
27,658
Following my meeting on Monday with the Education Secretary @bphillipsonMP my open letter to her is below and here: spectator.co.uk/article/what… My first open letter to her on 17 Jan is here: spectator.co.uk/article/what…
802
2,189
604
7,354
959,244
I am a male. I have been observing the proceedings from the Tribunal in Dundee with increasing horror. Such aggressive tactics and for what? To defend the indefensible I stand full square with women. We, as MEN must step up with our support!!! Please RT if you support
117
1,988
33
8,772
133,047
Yet another Lucky-bag referee.
1
318
What the Hell was O'Nien doing there?
1
258
Fan's favourite Luke O'Nien's at it again. Another stupid, unnecessary penalty given away. But he is wholehearted.
2
255
Replying to @Artemisfornow
A specific Act of Parliament was passed to make Starmer's CPS pension tax free. Why is one person's pension singled out for tax exemption? If you think STARMER SHOULD PAY TAX ON HIS PENSION LIKE THE REST OF US, please repost. If he expects to lead, he must also lead by example.
1
25
55
2,652
🎉🌼🌸April Fools! 🌸🌼🎉 Only kidding. Obviously, the people mentioned in the above tweets aren't women at all, but men, every last one of them. In passing the Scottish Hate Crime Act, Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls. The new legislation is wide open to abuse by activists who wish to silence those of us speaking out about the dangers of eliminating women's and girls’ single-sex spaces, the nonsense made of crime data if violent and sexual assaults committed by men are recorded as female crimes, the grotesque unfairness of allowing males to compete in female sports, the injustice of women’s jobs, honours and opportunities being taken by trans-identified men, and the reality and immutability of biological sex. For several years now, Scottish women have been pressured by their government and members of the police force to deny the evidence of their eyes and ears, repudiate biological facts and embrace a neo-religious concept of gender that is unprovable and untestable. The re-definition of 'woman' to include every man who declares himself one has already had serious consequences for women's and girls’ rights and safety in Scotland, with the strongest impact felt, as ever, by the most vulnerable, including female prisoners and rape survivors. It is impossible to accurately describe or tackle the reality of violence and sexual violence committed against women and girls, or address the current assault on women’s and girls’ rights, unless we are allowed to call a man a man. Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal. I'm currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment. If you agree with the views set out in this tweet, please retweet it. #ArrestMe #AprilFools #HateCrimeActScotland 11/X
4,061
29,218
2,601
92,769
6,015,349