Joined August 2022
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
No, its an American issue. Most other countries (bar maybe the UK) arent just blindly buying Iphones like they're the only smartphone on the market. Its almost a uniquely American issue
2
I bet you thought that was good response in your head
1
11
Don't watch football, trolling or dumb?
24
Ah yes the nation's league vs reaching the WC finals with the best G/A ratio and 2nd most goals for the tournament as well winning the MLS but sure Ronaldo was better......
9
163
Bro I gave u sooooo many arguments. All you done is "When did I say XYZ?" YOU HOLD NO BELIEFS. God isnt fake but isnt real either. You wont prove he exists becuase thats a "universal claim" 🤓. You provided examples that made 0 sense and now you are trying to quote Plantinga
4
When did I say everyone must accept my view? Nro you cant even make a proper claim for yourself. Hear what, when u decide if god is real or not then lets have a chat. Until then you stay in limbo believing something you dont want to/cant prove.
1
10
You seem to hold no view whatsoever then 😂. Wow this is so fascinating. God isnt real but its not fake either
5
But sure bro you saying you believe in god is totally different that if you said you claim god is real. Becuase in sure youd believe in somethijg you thought was fake.......
1
8
Its either you just pulled that out of your ass or you didnt understand that philosophical view at all lmao.
8
Ah yes its a universal claim which means absolutely nothing 😭. You are just putting words together that you think would make sense cus wtf are you even saying bruh. A universal claim 😭😭😭😭😭?
1
10
Then you claim that believing and claiming arent the same thing despite it being synonyms with one another in this context since you yourself didnt call out the wording when I used it earlier
1
5
U used a prime to prove a prime didnt exist below 2 and you used a bachelor to prove there are no bachelors after marriage. Neither of your examples can work on this case. The fact you couldnt see that is red flag 1
2
You came up with examples on how to prove a negative yet failed miserably becuase your examples didnt show how to prove a negative becuase in both your examples the negatives were already related to the subject u used to prove they didnt exist.
3
You started arguing semantics bro dont act like what you said made sense. "I beleive god exists but I didnt claaaaim god exists" that makes 0 fucking sense to anyone with a brain 😭😭😭😭.
1
9
Burden of proof for what? For the existsnce of god. How is me asking you for proof somehow weird when you kept asking me for the same?
1
8
Lol sure bud. Is that why you provided examples for ways to prove a negative? Becuase you didnt ask or want me to prove god didnt exist
1
14
You claimed that belief and claims are not the same thing but you didnt make that distinction until after you were asked repeatedly to prove god exists. Again, if u truly believed there was a difference you would've said that when i mentioned the word claim all the way back then
1
12
If your arguments arent about you believing in god then why did you ask me to prove god didnt exist? What was the point in that if you didnt hold some view on the topic?
1
14
I mentions claims waaay before that. If you truly held them as different then you would jave made the distinction all the way back then no?
What proof do you have to claim they might exist? We know it doesnt exist becuase there is no evidnce of it existing. By your logic there could be a peanbutter monster roaming the planet right now and you can't disagree becuase you cant prove it doesnt exist. Is that logical??
1
7
Your entire argument is about you believing god exists lol
1
9