Breaking Pocket retweeted
Replying to @charliebilello
The official numbers behind it, from the US Treasury and CBP's own court filing:
• The Supreme Court struck the IEEPA tariffs down on Feb 20, 2026 — about $166B had been collected from 330,000+ importers
• CBP has accepted $128.7B into its refund pipeline; about $100B was certified for payment by July 31 — plus interest running at roughly $650M a month on the unpaid balance
• Treasury's full-year statement: $317.8B collected in FY2026, $144.6B refunded, leaving net customs receipts of $173.2B — LOWER than FY2025's $194.9B
• October's net customs take: $19.2B, down 39% from the $31.3B peak a year earlier
And the structural point: by law, only the importer of record can claim. Apple booked a $2.2B windfall, Nike $986M — there is no refund mechanism for the consumer who paid the higher shelf price. The tariff was reversed. The price increase wasn't.
Breaking Pocket retweeted
Replying to @binance
"Binance will cover all losses" is the right first sentence. But trust now depends on the numbers behind it — and tonight, the numbers are still moving.
THE LOSS, IN DETAIL (what's confirmed vs estimated):
CONFIRMED:
• Billions left Binance's hot wallets Thursday afternoon — one transaction alone moved ~167,464 ETH, ~1.6 billion USDT and 60+ other tokens out of the Binance 14 wallet
• $2.54 billion has been frozen so far — Tether froze 1.567B+ USDT, Circle 800M+ USDC, Ripple ~$200M, World Liberty ~$27M, and Arbitrum's Security Council moved 74.56M ARB + 8,425 ETH out of the attacker's reach
• CZ himself called it a hack and conceded the net loss is "a bit higher" than the ~$1B estimate — "but will cover"
• Deposits and withdrawals are fully suspended, with no restart timeline given
ESTIMATED, NOT CONFIRMED:
• Total suspicious outflows range from $3.3B (The Block) to as high as $5.8B (on-chain analysts) — the higher figures include Bitcoin and Tron movements not all proven to be the attacker's
• The suspected entry point — an EIP-7702 wallet-delegation exploit — is a researcher theory, not a Binance-confirmed root cause
• Binance's SAFU emergency fund holds ~15,000 BTC (~$1.18B) — real money, but smaller than the plausible net loss here
OUR VIEW ON TRUST:
Binance has earned some benefit of the doubt — in 2019 it covered a 7,000 BTC hack in full from SAFU and said so plainly. But that was $40M. This is potentially a hundred times larger, and "funds are safe" is a claim, not proof.
Trust after a hack is rebuilt in exactly three steps: (1) publish the exact loss figure, not a range managed by leaks; (2) restore withdrawals fast — every hour users can't move their own money, the 2022 lesson gets relearned; (3) a real post-mortem explaining how one hot wallet could hold, and lose, billions.
Cover the losses, show the math, open the doors. Do those three and this becomes a story about resilience. Delay them, and it becomes a story about why people self-custody.
