Why did Jay Stratton effectively debunk his own book? With his background and access, he could have focused on military UAP encounters: trained observers, advanced sensors, and the evidence those systems collected. That could have made a compelling case for taking the subject seriously. Instead, he mixed that material with ghost stories, werewolves, poltergeists, psychic phenomena, and interdimensional portals. Maybe he believes these things are connected? Maybe including them felt essential to telling the whole story? But believing there is a connection is not the same as establishing one. His credentials cannot substitute for evidence, and evidence supporting one extraordinary claim does not automatically support the others. There’s also an obvious inconsistency. He describes repeated paranormal activity at Skinwalker Ranch and, especially, in his own home, yet apparently none of it could be recorded because the phenomenon knows when it’s being recorded. How convenient. Meanwhile, he opens the book with a triangular craft caught on video, and his military material involves UAP tracked and recorded by multiple systems. If these are related phenomena, why can one be documented while the other supposedly defeats every attempt? That difference calls for an explanation, not an assumption that they belong together. The problem goes beyond presentation. When an author asks readers to trust his judgment about military encounters, then applies that same judgment to werewolves and poltergeists, readers have a legitimate reason to question his ability to distinguish evidence from speculation throughout the book. He has effectively supplied his own debunking: a reason to dismiss the entire account without seriously considering its strongest material. And that is exactly the reaction playing out online. Even if these phenomena are connected, he could have presented the military evidence on its own and made the case for that connection separately. So why make the credibility of the military evidence depend on readers also accepting the paranormal stories?

🧵 Disclosure Foundation Chief Legal Officer Hunt Willis and other Foundation representatives were honored to recently brief the U.S. government's UAP Science Advisory Council (UAPSAC) on national security information and the PURSUE Initiative. The briefing examined the legal frameworks governing UAP disclosures, including a comparison of AARO and PURSUE, whistleblower protections, and congressional pathways to disclosure. We are making these materials publicly available at this time.

This week, I joined @NIHDirector_Jay, @DrOzCMS, and @DrSchwartzCDC at NIH to open a historic clinic dedicated to studying and caring for patients experiencing health problems following vaccination. We must listen to patients and families who report vaccine injuries—not dismiss or gaslight them. President Trump and I are building a health system that takes them seriously, follows the evidence, and uses what we learn to make vaccines safer. This is how we earn back trust in our public health institutions.

Another Marine I served with took his own life. Back in the day, we used to say that he was the one of us who could end up the president one day. He was smart, capable, and really had his shit together. That was 14 years ago.

You’re thinking like a human. Maybe some of them are biological drones. Don’t be so myopic.