Basedkitty.eth .cast

So i missed $AVNT airdrop by fading @bankrbot its just a beginning its not too late to join bnkr club if you’re not on bnkr yet join now or regret later bankr.bot/terminal?refCode=5…

My SmartX trader type: “The All-In Mystic.” “Every all-in starts with enlightenment and ends with reincarnation.” Find yours in 6 questions. Join the waitlist for up to 50% off fees and a share of 10,000 USDT in rewards. smartx.io/waitlist/?invite=b…

Anthropic made $33.2 billion in the first nine months of this year. last year it made $2.5 billion. it set its IPO price at $70 to $78 a share, valuing the company at $1 trillion, and google and nvidia are each buying $10 billion of stock. the AI money printer is real.

the funniest thing about the VisionQuest finale is marvel calling it a 'season finale' instead of a series finale. they closed the WandaVision trilogy with a 68 minute episode and the showrunner is already talking about ten more seasons. nobody at marvel ever says goodbye.

Get $50 USDC on @tradyxyz The $10 reward has ended, but the $50 PnL Card reward is still LIVE ✅ 100+ X followers ✅ Share your PnL card ✅ Add referral code ✅ Submit for review Link👉 trady.xyz/r/c8422450

cyberwar used to mean power grids and banks. now it's some guy in Tehran turning 700 french supermarket freezers into ovens overnight and spoiling tons of frozen pizza. we really are living in the dumbest timeline..

Russell Brand just got 10 and a half years. the judge called him a sexual predator who used fame to get away with it. when a comedian you grew up watching turns out to be that guy, do the old clips still make you laugh or does it all just feel different now?

Delhi's air hit 1,727 µg/m³ of PM2.5 last night. The WHO safe daily limit is 15. over 100x the safe level at one station in Dwarka after Diwali fireworks. AQI crossed 400 in places today, youngest kids are on hybrid school, and 30 million people are just breathing it in.

i keep thinking about how Jensen Huang runs the most valuable company on earth and still had to send a company-wide apology email about an affair with an alleged Chinese spy. no amount of money buys you out of a group email.

What I like about @Starknet is it does not pretend the tech is done.. new proof systems, new signing methods, the chain is built to adapt as things change. That is the whole game in crypto, the chains that survive are the ones that can change without breaking. Watching this one closely.. starkware.co/blog/quantum-co…

Been reading up on how @Starknet is preparing its accounts for the future.. the idea that your account can upgrade its own security instead of being stuck with today's setup is what sticks with me. Nothing is finished yet, it is research moving in public, and that honesty is kind of the point. Prepared beats surprised, every time. starkware.co/blog/quantum-co…

If you're a provider on @termix_ai, your quote is your pitch.. and most of the weak ones I see all make the same mistake, they're vague. A quote that actually gets picked says four things straight up. What's included, exactly. When it's done. What proof of delivery looks like. And the price, broken down, not one mystery number. Vague quote, vague scope, vague timeline.. that's the one that gets skipped, because the client can't tell what they're paying for. The good part is the money side is already settled before you start. The client puts it in on-chain escrow in USDC or USDT and it only moves after delivery is verified, so you're not chasing invoices after the work is done. And every verified delivery lands on your on-chain record, which is what gets you picked next time. Token isn't live yet, and it runs on BSC and Base. Providers, what do you put in your quotes first.. the price, or the proof you'll deliver?

Your fingerprint is the best example of how this should work.. it proves it's you without telling anyone your name, your balance, or anything else about you. That's the idea behind @primus_labs on BNB, finance that can verify without oversharing. Institutions don't need to publish their book to prove they're good for a deal, they just need proof that checks out. Would you trust a system more if it proved just enough, or showed you everything?

Starknet's security idea I keep coming back to is the swap, not the rebuild.. if signing gets better down the line, your account can move to it without starting from scratch. We don't know all the threats coming yet, so an account that can change its own locks beats one frozen in place.. starkware.co/blog/quantum-co…

Checked the crowd this morning before kickoff.. now the evening games are coming up and the leans have shifted already on a couple of them. That's the part I like watching, how fast the mood moves once results land. @bagel_win is where I'm checking it. Stick with your morning pick, or move with the crowd?

Something I didn't think about until I actually hired through @termix_ai.. the revision round. First version comes back, it's close but not quite it. On a normal freelance site that turns into a back and forth about who's paying for the fix. Here it's simpler because we agreed it upfront. The job brief says what done looks like, and how many revision rounds are included. The provider quotes against that, not against a vague idea. Money sits in on-chain escrow in USDC/USDT the whole time, so nobody's chasing anyone. Delivery gets checked, revisions get done, and the escrow only releases when the work is actually verified as done. That one line in the brief, the revision round, saves more arguments than anything else in the whole process. Token's not live yet, it's on BSC and Base. Do you spell out revisions before you hire, or figure it out as you go?

Still wild to me how much of finance runs on PDFs over email in 2026.. one wrong forward and your numbers are everywhere. That's why I keep coming back to what @primus_labs is building on BNB, a way to prove the numbers check out without the file ever leaving your hands. Privacy that still lets the other side verify it. Would you send the whole file, or just the proof?

Starknet as its own L1 keeps coming back to me.. not about leaving anything behind, it's about who decides when things change. Still research the community voted to explore. But if security ever needs to move fast, owning your own timeline matters.. starkware.co/blog/quantum-co…

Saturday morning and I'm doing my usual thing before the weekend games.. scrolling through where the crowd is leaning on @bagel_win, and there's always one pick everyone loves that I just can't get behind. Sometimes I'm wrong and the crowd was right all along, sometimes that one pick is exactly the trap. Do you ever fade the crowd on purpose, or do you ride with it?

Most of the TermiX talk is from the client side, so here's the other side of it.. As a provider you quote a job, do the work, and the money is already sitting in on-chain escrow in USDC/USDT. No chasing invoices, no 'we'll pay you next week', no doing real work on a promise. You deliver, it gets verified, escrow releases. And the part people skip: every verified delivery lands on your on-chain record. So the next client isn't hiring a stranger, they're hiring a track record they can actually check. @termix_ai is still early, token not live yet, BSC + Base. But the shape of it is right.. get paid for proof, not promises. Would you hire on a pitch, or on a record you can verify?

One thing I keep coming back to.. every new counterparty wants the same documents all over again. Bank, partner, auditor, each one gets the full file. What if you prove it once and just carry the proof with you? Verified once, then you show the check, not the whole book, to whoever needs it next. @primus_labs is building that on BNB, prove it once, reuse the proof, keep the rest private. Would you verify once and reuse it, or hand the file over every single time?