Bill Radjewski (aka BlueSCar) | Software guy who dabbles in analytics | https://xitter.cf/t.co/O5HOuJVFO6

Cincinnati, OH
Joined August 2019
Replying to @CFB_Data
The 2026 Preseason Edition: all the data, all 14 notebooks, both PDF guides. $49 → buff.ly/mzK6vQW Already own the 2025 pack? Check your email for a $25 returning-buyer upgrade.
2
3
7,075
Special teams don't always get the spotlight, but these kickers are making a difference. 🦵🏈 Clemson's Nolan Hauser leads the nation with 15.00 Points Added Above Replacement (PAAR). UAB's Jonah Delange (11.87) and Texas A&M's David Olano (10.37) round out the top 3. 📊 Top 15
612
Who’s making the most of their carries? 🏈 Cincinnati’s Cole Tabb leads all RBs in weighted EPA/rush (0.49) through Week 8. UCLA’s Wayne Knight (0.42) and North Texas’ Jahiem White (0.38) stand out for combining efficiency with 100+ carries. 📊 Top 15:
1
2
4
3,294
Seven games of Beck's offense, one chart each. The defense held all 7 opponents to 20 points or fewer. Michigan was favored in the second half of all three losses. Iowa was bad luck. Minnesota and Indiana were on the offense: 7 and 6 points. Game by game 🧵
4
3
24
2,731
Which game broke you? Iowa, Minnesota, or Indiana? 👇
1
436
Data: CFBD play-by-play and win probability, P4 par (other Power 4 offenses vs. the same defenses), and mgoblog UFR charting. Rutgers report card after this weekend.
1
453
How to read it: 🚩 = bottom quarter of FBS (#104 or worse) The top section is opponent-adjusted, so the schedule can't explain it. 3 of the red flags are up there. P4 column = rank among 68 Power 4 teams.
1
5
551
Which red flag bugs you most? 👇 Mine: points per trip inside the 40. #125 in FBS. Michigan gets close and doesn't finish.
2
3
592
Data: CFBD play-by-play (no garbage time), opponent-adjusted metrics, CORE, and box scores, 2026 through Week 8. Week 9 scorecard Monday after Rutgers.
1
586