Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL) header
Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL) profile picture
Joined January 2020
Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)Photo by Rob Lawman (@CFCRobL)
surprised its lost on so many that there’s a very large middle ground between starting every week and being frozen out of getting any minutes behind a not firing front line Clubs better than us would give Estevao much more opportunity than we currently are, stop kidding yourself
1
5
388
Thought he was great last night and actually thought he was pretty good against Spurs too (minus the mistake, of course). Of all the new recruits, he's the one I'm least worried about, wouldn't be surprised he's starting come the end of the season
Love to see this from Penders. He’s a reliable shot-stopper who doesn’t let in easy goals. He’s also always had the mentality to bounce back from mistakes.
2
21
848
Unfortunately some of this falls down when he's behind Quenda in the pecking order despite more PL experience. He shouldn't be starting every game but the fact he's not even getting 20-30 minutes to prove himself in games we could benefit from having him is ridiculous
It is understood Estevao's limited role under Alonso is not the result of a fall-out, and purely down to tactical and technical decisions. Chelsea’s manager has hinted that the physicality of the Premier League is a contributing factor while promising greater chances as the season progresses.  External sources have confided that his situation is piquing interest within Premier League and European circles. (via @kierangill_DM)
1
8
545
If everyone was flying and he wasn't able to get into the team then fairs, that's the struggles of being at a big club but that isn't the case - we're in that dangerous territory where people are amplifying negatives to a huge degree to justify what is an unjustifiable omission
1
2
210
"he's not the best defensively" for a 19 year old winger who has had some big moments in a Chelsea shirt already and is regularly playing for Brazil is a nonsense argument when the alternative is 90 minutes of Neto who is not the best at anything either.
5
175
what in the reincarnation of Delap was this btw
Emegha is a certified mad man😂😂😂😂 What is this please?
4
316
Not overly fussed about the result last night, a kick away from winning away at Anfield with big players missing isn't the end of the world - however it has confirmed that we need to be absolutely surgical with some departures and additions in the summer
3
3
31
1,270
the whole Estevao thing feels like a point is trying to be proved but I can't for the life of me work out what point that is.
3
14
1
113
3,698
cheeky bid for Trev in January?
1
1
9
783
that penalty sums up everything i've seen of Emegha, he quite literally struggles to kick a football
4
2
1
90
5,837
god I hope he proves me wrong
🚨 Emegha is in the squad for tomorrow. #CFC
2
370
added bonus points if we can actually see him play on the right where he looked great in pre-season rather than play him LB ahead of two of our better performing players.
Neto’s been good. Chavarría impressive. Hato’s had moments. Cool. But I wanna see more Palestra now.
1
407
Ultimately, it's one game, but it's shown some of the most worrying things that I hate in managers. Stubbornness through things that clearly aren't working, over complicated 'solutions' when simpler ones exist, passively watching a game go wrong. Needs to course correct quickly
What the fuck has this been from Alonso? Literally got every decision wrong, players out of position, refusing to play a striker when it's clear it's not working One of the worst managerial displays i've seen in a long, long time and we've had a lot to choose from recently
5
1
45
2,050
What the fuck has this been from Alonso? Literally got every decision wrong, players out of position, refusing to play a striker when it's clear it's not working One of the worst managerial displays i've seen in a long, long time and we've had a lot to choose from recently
12
51
3
534
14,803
£830m??? yikes the nuclear button might get pressed after all that is absurd.
The scale of Manchester City's financial cheating laid bare in independent commission report: the club overstated sponsorship income by more than £830 million over eight years.
1
6
735
Rob Lawman retweeted
Don't care. Only total fucking losers care about retroactively awarded titles.
🚨🚨 | 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐈𝐍: Chelsea would be awarded the 2018 Carabao Cup if Manchester City are stripped of their trophies. [@TeleFootball] #CFC 👀
14
302
3
3,179
71,026
no thanks, have zero desire in any retrospective trophies we didn’t actually win being awarded. You don’t get the moment, the highlights to watch back, it doesn’t mean anything. Just wipe that years record and let’s all move on
🚨🚨 | 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐈𝐍: Chelsea would be awarded the 2018 Carabao Cup if Manchester City are stripped of their trophies. [@TeleFootball] #CFC 👀
5
25
1,454
umm, that's just a definite red?
🚨𝗗𝗘𝗕𝗔𝗧𝗘: Declan Rice lost his cool. Did this challenge on Malick Yalcouyé warrant a red card? xitter.gq/csabesz30/status/21013…
2
1
1
17
2,048
about time refs started catching on - just a shame they're the last people in the country to do so
1
2
711
understand the emotional response, some criticisms absolutely justified and amplified by early season hopes but we're GW5 into a new system with key players missing. Doesn't excuse results nor suggest improvement isn't needed but reactions are a bit OTT for me.
1
8
515
but yeah, if you add even 2 of JP, Caicedo, Palestra, Reece back into the mix then it's likely a very different outcome. Hell, even Emegha who I don't rate at all atleast gives you another option rather than Welbeck for 90 or Rogers/Palmer having to adapt into SS
1
1
210
All of this to say, I get the concern, we've a way to go but it's very early days and there are some very glaring circumstances which cannot be ignored, some self imposed, some just exceptionally unlucky. We'll be fine, onwards and upwards
1
180