Replying to @NetrunnerLogic
You can’t exploit a hole that doesn’t exist
Replying to @GemmaBlackUK
Literally had an argument with someone about a decade ago who wanted to build his own encryption over http
Replying to @imsnk8
This was in the Osprey repo. It wrote a few files in Osprey for fun.
Replying to @CatalinAdler
All human written code is spaghetti, whether it’s open source or not. Windows is surely the same and macOS would have similar issues but less attack surface
The difference is that if a malicious actor wants to plant something in Linux, they have to do it in the open
Replying to @NetrunnerLogic
No, actually. That’s not how code works, unless your team just doesn’t care.
Claude Code is still way better than Codex
Last night I pointed Codex Astra at an existing Osprey app compiled for macOS and told it to create a new similar app that CC had no trouble with
It wrote the whole thing in Swift. It had no idea the point was to use Osprey
This is also why we need open source OSs
It’s why Windows and macOS may become untenable unless they are open sourced
I hope people realize that governments and other actors are already using spyware to exploit these vulnerabilities
They’ve been telling us they’re doing this for over a decade
This is how they hack phones and computers
Get it now?
Maybe time to fix the holes you think?
Replying to @danpdc
This is only the tip of the iceberg
AI is already sitting on hundreds or thousands of exploits that haven’t been reported yet
You can open any critical repo and find exploits everywhere with AI
The point is now is the time to actually do something
Replying to @SeanTynan
Even AI is not the silver bullet but it’s a starting point and we can at least think about tackling the problem at scale now
Replying to @gubatron
At least AI attempts to design secure code
A lot of humans I’ve worked with are actively hostile towards secure coding practices
Replying to @michael_kove
I hope people come to realize that they’re brains are not as sharp as they think
The arrogance to think that the fallible human mind is even remotely capable of safely engineering critical systems is mind boggling
This is a wake up call that human engineering is dangerous
Replying to @vyrotek @mrwcjoughin
Signals, yes. It’s a standard pattern
Replying to @weswinham
Just confront the problem and acknowledge that you need to fix bugs.
The number of times I’ve pointed out security holes and people have said things like…
“It won’t happen”
“You’re being paranoid”
“We don’t need https. We can just encrypt it ourselves”
Replying to @michael_kove
I can’t believe people are surprised by b this…
You can open any platform’s code with almost any model and you’ll find tonnes of security holes
I hope the takeaway from this PHP thing is that people start to wake up to the fact that our software and infrastructure is like Swiss cheese, can’t be trusted and this is the work of HUMANS.
AI is not the threat. Infact, AI is the ticket to finding and fixing the security holes
Replying to @HaziqBuilds
Well, Terminator said it was possible so it must be real
Replying to @oncelcebeci
It’s amazing how AI is supposed to be the problem when humans are this bad

