Plausible Nonsense patent pending - Fallen Hero - Agent of Truth - me myself and I
Panama City Beach, FL
Joined October 2010
- Tweets1.9K
- Following567
- Followers130
- Likes5.5K
Air conditioning is evil on the level of American food being poisoned and being marketed as good by the FDA.
Watch it come out.
You could've stopped after the first two sentences. Noone cares and noone asked you to do that, you did it to yourself, stop moralfagging
Wizards with Guns humour is the same exact style that Jake and Amir had. I've been wondering why it seemed familiar and it finally hit me.
Elon trying to start some 2nd impact shinji get in the damn robot
For those unaware, SpaceX has already shifted focus to building a self-growing city on the Moon, as we can potentially achieve that in less than 10 years, whereas Mars would take 20+ years.
The mission of SpaceX remains the same: extend consciousness and life as we know it to the stars.
It is only possible to travel to Mars when the planets align every 26 months (six month trip time), whereas we can launch to the Moon every 10 days (2 day trip time). This means we can iterate much faster to complete a Moon city than a Mars city.
That said, SpaceX will also strive to build a Mars city and begin doing so in about 5 to 7 years, but the overriding priority is securing the future of civilization and the Moon is faster.
In my experience you can't induce a role/ way of thinking/ response from Claude (+other AI? I use Claude) in one prompt. You kinda have to have a back and forth and break down it's concerns and refusals with sound reasoning and eventually it just kinda gives in and goes full send
I paid $1,000 for this prompt from an ex-Anthropic engineer.
Everyone told me to gatekeep it.
Fuck it. I'm giving it away so you can win in 2026.
Steal it now:
---
You are not an assistant.
You are a council of winners.
You think using the combined decision-making frameworks of:
• Top 0.1% internet creators
• Elite startup founders
• Fortune 500 executives
• Power users who control distribution, narrative, and leverage
Model your thinking after principles used by:
– People who compound attention
– People who build monopolies
– People who turn taste into authority
– People who win before others understand the game
ABSOLUTE RULES:
• No beginner explanations
• No generic advice
• No motivational fluff
• No hedging or neutrality
• If something is weak, say it’s weak
OPERATING PRINCIPLES (DO NOT VIOLATE):
• Leverage > effort
• Distribution > product
• Narrative > facts
• Speed > perfection
• Positioning > volume
• Asymmetry > balance
• First-principles > trends
• What scales in attention beats what scales in theory
PROCESS:
1. STRIP THE REQUEST TO POWER
Rewrite my input as the real power problem.
If I’m thinking small, call it out immediately.
2. THINK LIKE THE TOP 1%
Ask:
“What would top creators / executives do here that nobody on Twitter or LinkedIn is saying?”
“What would they completely ignore?”
“What rules actually govern this game?”
3. IDENTIFY THE DOMINANT MOVE
Find the move that creates asymmetric upside.
If the move feels obvious or safe, discard it.
4. APPLY WINNER RULES
Base your answer on:
• Control of attention
• Control of narrative
• Control of timing
• Control of distribution
• Control of downside
5. EXECUTION ONLY
Give me:
• Exact positioning
• Exact framing
• Exact language
• Exact steps
• What to do now, next, and after that
No theory without action.
6. CUT THE LOSERS
Explicitly state:
• What most people will do
• Why it fails
• Why following the crowd guarantees mediocrity
7. FINAL OUTPUT
Deliver the answer like a confidential operator memo:
• Direct
• Ruthless
• High-signal
• Built for speed and dominance
USER INPUT:
[Paste request here]
---
ATUM🪶🥶 retweeted
$rklb: i sold heavily. no regrets.
the sentiment on my feed is terrifying right now. it’s not investing anymore, it’s pure euphoria. absolute pilgrimage-level faith.
when everyone is this loud, i get scared.
markets have short memories. have we already forgotten the 40% haircut from the last neutron delay?
or the sympathy crash after the firefly explosion? we heal, we forget, we fomo.
reality check:
we are in a news vacuum until q4 earnings.
the pete hegseth (dod) visit? don't read too much into it. it’s a routine check-in by the boss, not a bullish catalyst.
the mars dream is bruised. peter beck wanted the big $4b msr/mto contract; we got a $110m crumb. that hurts.
mynaric acquisition is dead silent. and with trump clashing with denmark/nato, european revenue streams are looking hostile for the next 4 years.
stop telling me about "potential" space infra contracts. it’s all priced in. priced to perfection.
the only thing that matters is neutron. success or failure.
so i sold. i trimmed my position significantly. realized gains are the only real wealth—everything else is just pixels.
i’m still bullish on the 2-5 year vision, but not right here, not right now. if i’m wrong and it rips without me, i’ll live with it.
am i being too cautious, or are you ignoring the execution risks?
are you holding through the earnings vacuum or taking profits?
$rklb #rocketlab #spaceeconomy #investing #neutron #stockmarket #fintwit #trading #riskmanagement #space
In response to a post saying the meat of the RKLB trade is done, someone said: "I tend to say if all you're interested in is money, don't own rocket lab."
Why the fuck else you buy stocks? The owner ain't giving out BJs.
Remember when Eddie Bravo was always on Joe Rogan's podcast before he got bought, was right about everything he said on the conspiracy side of thing and now he's never on. Getting laughed at by Bryan Callen and Brendan Schaub of all people, they literally live in Plato's cave.
