Pinned Tweet
I’ve kept so much of this movie under wraps but it’s Halloween so fuck it. Meet The Bunny Man. 🐇
All of that hard work only to use generative A.I. for all the backgrounds. Honestly makes the episode even more infuriating.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Calob Robinson retweeted
Yeah, I've waited 8 episodes for satisfying character development. This final scene made me drop my jaw not because it looked great, but because it *felt* great seeing John finally becoming Green Lantern after everything he's been through. *Character over spectacle*
Calob Robinson retweeted
the Lanterns finale was perfection. god I love shows where the main attraction is the character writing.
New South Park using generative a.i. was lame as fuck. For a show that’s had so many creative highs, this felt lazy and counterintuitive to what the shows all about. I expected more from Matt and Trey. Then again I’ve been let down by a lot of my favorite creatives lately.
Calob Robinson retweeted
“They only used AI for concept art”
“They only used AI for some shots”
“They only used AI for one scene”
“They only used AI for a few scenes”
“They only used AI for the 3rd act”
I’m already seeing idiots rationalizing the use of AI. This is exactly how they want you to think.
Calob Robinson retweeted
This is your wake up call btw I hope you know every huge corporation has been using generative AI.
Also whoever’s idea it was to put AI artwork in the art book ur kinda goated in a weird way
The new ‘SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY’ art book revealed that AI-generated concept art was used for designing New York City in the film.
(Via: thedirect.com/article/spider…)
The most embarrassing aspect of this is that it was found in the art book. Hollywood isn’t even hiding this shit. They’re proud of it.
The art book for ‘SPIDER-MAN: BRAND NEW DAY’ reveals that generative AI was used in concept design of NYC for the film.
(Source: thedirect.com/article/spider…)
Calob Robinson retweeted
We shouldn’t oversimplify how IMAX works. IMAX was conceived as an immersive exhibition format-historically described as “Image Maximum”-with the aim of filling as much of the viewer’s field of vision as practical. The taller image is only one part of that philosophy. The larger frame, steep seating geometry, screen size, projection brightness and sound system all work together to create the sense of immersion.
That’s why simply saying, “you see more picture,” misses the point. The additional image area exists because it contributes to the immersive experience when viewed on a genuine IMAX screen. If you simply take a 1.43:1 image and display the whole frame on a conventional screen from a normal viewing distance, the effect changes completely. It no longer fills your peripheral vision, so the composition can feel unusually loose or distant. The framing was designed for an immersive presentation environment, not simply for preserving every pixel regardless of the display.
The explanation and cropping below does a total disservice to all the work put in to make a true IMAX image and the skill
Needed to make it work in other formats. You are not losing anything that is intended in no IMAX versions. Non IMAX version are all signed off and approved by the creatives.
Getting really tired of seeing so many IMAX takes from folks that CLEARLY haven’t even seen a movie in IMAX before. It’s not something that can simply be explained. You have to experience it.
The consensus on Supergirl is genuinely puzzling to me. I even liked the needle drop, and I’d be willing to bet most people would’ve been neutral on it had they not seen “LMAO THIS IS SO CRINGE” all over their feeds before seeing it. It’s like a mass psychosis. Swear to god.




























