Pinned Tweet
Who could have predicted that Indians would start dumping their trash in open public spaces upon arrival to Canada?
We would like the Liberals to stop focusing on being death assistants and start focusing on how to increase our ethnic Canadian birth rate.
The French settled the St. Lawrence and grew by fertility. They fought hostile tribes and only allied when trade or a common enemy made it worthwhile.
British rapid expansion was aided by epidemics that devastated Indigenous populations and mass immigration. Treaties and the Indian Act then secured the land without the cost of permanent occupation.
That deal created a dependency that has only deepened. The French rule was simpler: ally for a real interest, then stop. No open-ended transfers.
Pretending the treaties and Indian Act mean permanent friendship is a later evasion of that standard.
Leaders like Carney who keep pouring more of our money into this arrangement while calling it friendship -- as our own people’s birth rate hits record lows -- are not partners or statesmen. They are weak, self-deluding managers of decline.
The parallel Indigenous government is a welfare cartel that exists to collect transfers. It does not lead real nations.
Federal Indigenous spending hit $40.8B in 2024/25 (Fraser Institute, excluding major settlements). Cumulative lawsuit and class-action settlements exceed $113B (inflation-adjusted) since 1974.
Indigenous people are 5% of the population.
We have a dream.
Dissolve race-based Indigenous sovereignty. End the parallel governments and the legal fiction that ancestry creates a separate political order inside Canada. These structures exist to collect and distribute transfers. They are not nations. They are a race-based welfare cartel.
End the Indian Act and the treaties. Return the casinos to the Crown. One country. One set of laws. No parallel sovereignty.
Only 3 of 10 Surrey Conservative MLAs confirmed Canadian-born.
3 confirmed foreign-born from Punjab.
Turbans are a Sikh practice from Punjab. Canada is not Punjab. Ethnic Canadians set the norm.
The history of Anglo-Canada is consolidating English, Scottish, Irish, German, Scandinavian, Dutch and other European origins into one civic standard.
That’s why so many get tribal about civic nationalism and balk when anyone mentions ethnic origin. It exposes the numbers: only 14.7% reported English origins in 2021, and most of that is mixed.
High-English mixes often react with visceral indignation because it shows how thin the ethnic English base is while holding the Anglo standard together with amalgamated others.
Same reason for the common balk at the fleur-de-lis: French Canadian ethnic preservation encourages non-French origin ethnic Canadians to join in the broader ethnic Canadian preservation of all components of Canadian ethnicity.
We can recognize both Canadian ethnicity and the civic standard without pretending it’s all or nothing.
The Anglo consolidation of those non-French European origins, plus French Canadian origin, is the ethnic Canadian people itself living in the same country with a strict bilingual standard -- not a pure English base, or English plus French, or pure civic abstraction.
Full definition here: npoc1867.ca/ethniccanada
Saskatchewan and Newfoundland want control of their own managed decline -- the power to import replacements from outside the historic ethnic Canadian stock.
Close the border. Deport the least compatible. Raise our own.
Borders. Birth rate. Nuclear defence.
NPOC1867.ca
Saskatchewan, Newfoundland push Ottawa for greater control over immigration
theglobeandmail.com/politics…
US rap and hip-hop from post-slave trade integration shapes Canadian youth behaviour. We want our national heritage to do that instead.
That influence, and other US media, is why we need barriers.
Cut CBC’s $1.5B. $500M to pro-natal funding, $1B to a Canadian heritage media fund.
Black pill is surrender.
All solutions are political.
NPOC1867.ca
Calling King Charles III a “British king” who rules Canada is legally and historically inaccurate. Canada has its own Crown. The King of Canada is not the King of the United Kingdom.
What we are seeing with the ugliness of foreign ethnic lobbying is the result of a relatively empty void of Canadian ethnic assertion. A country is not just a set of civic values -- it is a people. If Anglo-Canada’s only claim is to civic values, then it must stand alongside the other weightings of Canadian ethnicity, because civic values are not a people.
The Anglo ethnic and descent component is real, but it is one weighting among the other major ethnic Canadian components, not the definition of the whole. The Union Jack, English, and our shared institutions are civic inheritances, not proof of ethnic dominance. “Anglo-Canada” means a common language, law, and public symbols — not Anglo-Canadian descent. British ethnic stock was never the sole foundation of the country. The French were the majority early on, then became a minority, just as every other ethnic Canadian component is now to varying degrees.
Today none of the core four -- English, Irish, Scottish, or French -- are replacing themselves, while old-stock German descent has held its share of the population. That is not a claim about any one group. It is a simple observation that Canadian ethnicity is carried forward by those who have children, not by those who most loudly assert civic values.
We are Canadian by blood, and that blood continues only through the descendants of those who came before. We value the English component of Canada, bilingualism, and the broader Anglo-Canadian civic order. We recognize the former dominance of the British Crown and its commitment to Canadian nation building. We do not need to pretend ethnic Canada is something it is not.
We are free to wave all ethnic Canadian symbols and there's nothing hateful about that.











