Lassiez-Faire Anarchist, Shit-Talker, Armchair General If you think my advocacy for freedom is extreme, that says more about you than it does about me.
'Straya
Joined September 2017
- Tweets20.7K
- Following212
- Followers402
- Likes9.5K
Pinned Tweet
I am a libertarian.
That means I want a fair and equitable world. And what I mean by that is everyone is free to find the best way they can serve the needs of others, and be served in turn.
I am an anarchist.
That means I believe the best way to do that is without a state.
"Thousands of cancer deaths"
The actual Chernobyl bodycount:
31-54 direct deaths from radiation poisoning
160 estimated cases of thyroid cancer from contaminated milk
Increased rate of leukemia in the most exposed rescue and recovery workers.
After Chernobyl alone caused thousands of cancer deaths how could anybody say they would prefer living next to a nuclear facility than wind turbines, which occasionally kill maintenance workers. abc.net.au/news/2026-11-08/f…
1
26
All higher estimates I've seen all use a Linear-No-Threshold model of radiation exposure.
That means that health hazards are scaled backward linearly from where cancer diagnosis can be proved to be due to radiation and assumes no safe level of exposure.
Which is utter quackery.
1
3
So why has every single successful communist revolution been in an agrarian or feudal society?
Not a single industrialized, capitalist society has had a revolution.
NOT
ONE
Call urself an anarcho-"capitalist"
Bro u want an armed working class bro
Bro once the ploretariat is armed there isn't capitalism bro
27
Western translators are people who failed to create anything in their lives and are assmad about it, so they become parasites who impose their vision on foreign works.
Unironically as bad as games journalists.
People who complain about localization must take a Translation course in Linguistics and understand why Literal one-for-one translation is not always the option
- Said by the guy who is majoring English Linguistics
10
Socialism be like "Instead of living in the real world where things people want need time, effort, and resources, we just live in a fantasy land where uncertainty doesn't exist, houses grow on trees, and roast chickens fly into people's mouths."
"All we need is murder."
ALT Dana Donnelly (@danadonly) on Twitter: "capitalism is like 'ok hear me out. what if instead of living in a nice safe world where everyone’s basic needs are met, we live in a bad dangerous world where most people can barely feed themselves but two people have like 500 yachts'"
2
19
Socialists always ignore production service labour so they have an excuse to take all your stuff.
Conveniently ignoring that without it there wouldn't be workers to "exploit" in the first place.
8
Know why this happens:
On one side is a tabula rasa mindset. In this view, anything that creates a disparate outcome between two groups is discriminatory.
On the other side is an individualistic mindset. In this view, the only thing that matters is someone's actions.
1
37
Hi. It's me. I'm that libertarian.
There's quite a lot of us, actually, you just plug your ears whenever we start speaking so you never have to seriously examine your own ideology.
I’ve never met a single libertarian with the balls to actually study Marx that didn’t come away agreeing.
Every single one that criticizes Marxism is afraid to do that.
Every single one.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Many libertarians have studied Marx extensively and remained critical of his ideas, including Thomas Sowell (Marxism: Philosophy and Economics) and Phillip Magness (editor of The Best of Karl Marx).
fee.org/articles/book-…
thedailyeconomy.org/article/introd…
x.com/philwmagness/s…
5
Everything humanity needed to survive was already a money-making machine.
This has been true since the first farmer scattered seeds across a floodplain, and the first warlord demanded a cut of the harvest.
Capitalism just allows everyone to participate in the money-making.
7
CapnPipsqueak retweeted
Monopoly is a game with fixed resources, no innovation, no production, and no creation of new wealth. The only way to get richer is at someone else's expense.
That sounds considerably closer to socialism than capitalism.
And it's precisely the centralized economic authority socialism requires that enables the state to impose monopolies, eliminate competition, and appoint winners and losers.
CapnPipsqueak retweeted
The bitter pill for socialists is that when they condemn cronyism, they're condemning the very political authority their own system seeks to expand.
They recognize the corruption of government picking winners and losers, yet demand even greater government control over who gets what.
Their proposed solution to political favoritism is to give politicians more power to dispense favors.