Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics) header
Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics) profile picture

Software for Insurers, MGAs & Lloyd's. Track regulatory rules as part of operations. Make decisions with context.

London, UK
Joined March 2015
Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)Photo by Context Visualised (@CoViAnalytics)
This week we opened two parts of Halden's risk management framework: appetite and policies. Halden is a fictitious Lloyd's managing agent. The whole framework sits on one map.
1
1
It starts from the plan and the capital you already report to Lloyd's, set against your risks. So the risk report sits inside the business report. You don't build the framework from scratch. You start from ours and make it yours.
1
1
For Lloyd's managing agents and syndicates: if you're looking to refresh your risk appetite, let's have a chat. We'll demo Halden and show how it fits your firm. covianalytics.com/talk-to-us…
5
Your risk appetite and your policies sit in different documents. At Halden, a fictitious Lloyd's managing agent, they meet on the same step of the work.
1
2
Appetite: "The coverholders and partners who act for us stay inside the authority we give them." Policy: "Every risk is written inside a signed authority." Both land where a coverholder binds a risk.
1
1
One indicator watches both: out-of-authority binding. Both owners see the same number. Next week: how we draw processes, as tube maps of the business. covianalytics.com/halden/fra…
1
"Payments are handled properly" can't be checked. "Every payment has two authorisers" can. Here's how Halden, a fictitious Lloyd's managing agent, sets up its policies.
1
Each policy breaks into principles, each with its own owner and a test of what good looks like. Each principle maps to the risks it covers, the controls that show it is met, and the indicators that show it still holds.
1
Some principles serve more than one policy. "Claims data is complete and checked before use" is written once and used by three. See all four example policies: covianalytics.com/resources/…
1
An appetite statement says what the board won't accept. It rarely says what happens when a limit gets close. Here's how Halden, a fictitious Lloyd's managing agent, sets up its appetite.
1
3
A few statements for the whole firm first. Then layers for class, subclass and risk. Softer statements, like fair customer outcomes, use indicators. Each statement has responses waiting on the rack, with an owner and a trigger.
1
4
At Halden, coverage after a 1-in-10 year loss fell below its 130% trigger. The owner switched on the agreed response: pausing new US casualty growth. The board report shows which responses are running.
3
Ask where the risk framework lives, and you get a list of documents. Here's how Halden, a fictitious Lloyd's managing agent, sets up its framework on a page instead.
1
3
Reporting runs through every part. This week we open the first two: appetite and policies.
1
1
"This is a solid start to the year." Lloyd's now operates in "a world that is structurally disorderly". Patrick Tiernan, Lloyd's Chief Executive So we turned Lloyd's first half into five questions for your own board.
1
2
One of them: "How much of our 2027 profit plan rests on investment return?" Why ask it: rising yields cut Lloyd's investment return by 43%, even as underwriting profit grew.
1
2
1/ What should a board take from Lloyd's first half? We read the 22-page Half Year Report 2026 and put the answer in six slides.
1
3
2/ The headline is a solid half. Underneath: five risks the Chief Executive named, a class that swung to a loss, acquisition costs rising faster than premium, and a portfolio that is mostly bonds.
1
2