They were told theyhad to secure the API their web app used (the API was a desktop app written in Delphi). The “dev” (I use the term loosely) stuck the user name and password in the JavaScript that downloaded to the browser!!!
So much shonky work out there.
2/2
To monitor and record their operating temperature. Food safety.
You build it in, or you have to get an after market solution and install it.
Why isn’t it secure? You should see some of the apps we’ve rejected. Had a director throw her friend some work. They were told they
1/n
Yes, there’s a lot more mass, and load bearing structures for supporting heavy bombs. And a couple of huge engines where the empty cabin space of a Lear would be.
And empty Lear is a light weight, the heaviest model is still half that of an empty F-4.
An F-4 is between 2x and 6x the empty weight of a Lear (depends on the Lear model).
A F-4 has a couple of big engines are load carrying structures, and it still “vaporises” on impact. Thee’s a lot less “substance” to a Lear.
It’s almost as if he doesn’t have a clue about space flight or rocket science.
Ever hear him try to explain why the launch site where It is, on the East coast and as close to the Equator as they can get? He’s repeating something he heard once and never bothered to learn.
Fiber optic military drones aren’t the sort of FMCG you get at Target. Or household “white goods”.
But we all get it, you’re responding to a different question asked because you don’t like the question asked.
Film i’d say the wing was missing. Digital? Maybe, maybe not. There is so much more taking place between the light hitting a photoreceptor and what we have as a finished image, that that’s without active manipulation.
Well JetBrains isn't Russian
And Warthunder hasn't been Russian for almost a quarter of a century
Telegram fled Russia
Borscht is Ukrainian
Unfortunately a muppet who was contracting with the NSA caused in all Russia cyber-security products, not just Kaspersky, having an effective embargo to both the USA and EU.
In the clip she doesn't try and so doesn't fail.
She asks the interviewer to name one, the purpose of the question to highlight that Russia has completely failed to enter the EU consumer goods market.
Her knowledge or lack thereof isn't being scrutinised by her question.
A cursory viewing shows something completely different.
She's "challenging" a non-Russian expert to name a single product that he'd want to buy, highlighting that Russia isn't making anything the average person wants to buy.
It's not that hard to understand!!
"Can you think of 1 Russian PRODUCT that you've EVER WANTED TO BUY"
For starters Sberbank hasn't MADE anything that I wanted to buy.
You mean a real life people aren't attractive as those who have been photoshopped and/or filtered beyond recognition?
