Humanity is missing these days. Even in our country. No one speaks of unity, love or affection. Media & political parties are busy with such opinions of hatred & creating an influence on the general public. Those who are responsible citizens are not bothered about what we are giving to the present & next generation. We have forgotten the lessons from the Hiroshima & Nagasaki nuclear attacks. People must understand no religion creates difference but it's the interpreter who creates one. When I retired in 2021 with a dream to influence our young generation for the betterment of people and our great Nation and its heritage I have jotted for our citizens if its suit may be shared with others. Jai Hind!! #love #affection #bonding #responsibility #nationfirst #duties #citizen #proudindian #heritage #Soldiers

STOP SENDING YOUR SPOKESPERSONS TO DEBATES THAT MOCK DEMOCRACY! Why do political parties continue sending their representatives to national television debates where they are neither heard fairly nor given an equal opportunity to present their views? If a media channel appears more interested in defending the government or promoting a particular political party than in conducting independent journalism, why should opposition representatives continue to participate in such debates? What is the point of sitting on a panel when your microphone can be muted, your voice switched off, your arguments interrupted, and your presence reduced to a mere formality? You are invited not necessarily to be heard, but to provide the appearance of a debate while the channel drives its own preferred narrative. My appeal to all political parties and their leaders is simple: STOP SENDING YOUR REPRESENTATIVES TO SUCH DEBATES. Do not allow your spokespersons to become props in a television spectacle that undermines meaningful public discourse. If a channel is unwilling to provide a fair, independent and balanced platform, deny it the participation it seeks. This is not about silencing the media. It is about reminding the media of its responsibility to question those in power, uphold journalistic independence, and give competing viewpoints a fair hearing. Let the channels introspect. Let them ask themselves whether they are serving the public interest or merely acting as political party spokespersons. When your voice is repeatedly muted, your absence can become a stronger message than your presence. Democracy needs independent journalism, not manufactured debates. Political parties must have the courage to stop legitimising platforms that refuse to listen. AVOID. BOYCOTT UNFAIR DEBATES. DEMAND ACCOUNTABILITY. The media must remember: it is supposed to question those in power, not become their echo. JAI HIND!! Col Amit Kumar Veteran #IndependentMedia #MediaAccountability #SaveJournalism #Democracy #FreedomOfSpeech #PoliticalDebates

JANTAR MANTAR, THE NATIONAL FLAG AND THE LAW: IS PEACEFUL PATRIOTISM AN OFFENCE? Can unfurling the National Flag at Jantar Mantar be wrong merely because citizens are protesting? The National Flag represents our Constitution, freedom and the sacrifices of countless Indians. It belongs to every citizen, including those who peacefully question the government. Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b) of the Constitution guarantee freedom of speech and expression and the right to assemble peacefully without arms, subject to constitutionally permissible restrictions. Is Jantar Mantar a “Prohibited Place”? Section 2(8) of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, defines a “prohibited place” by reference to specified defence establishments and other places falling within the statutory definition. Certain other locations require a Central Government notification in the Official Gazette, subject to the applicable statutory conditions. Jantar Mantar does not automatically become a prohibited place under the Official Secrets Act merely because it is a protest venue or because restrictions are imposed on public gatherings. Authorities may regulate protests under other applicable laws or lawful orders. However, regulating a gathering does not, by itself, convert the venue into a “prohibited place” under the Official Secrets Act. What Has the Supreme Court Said? In Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan v. Union of India (2018), the Supreme Court recognised the importance of peaceful protest and addressed the need to balance protesters’ fundamental rights with the rights of residents and the public. The legal position is clear in principle: peaceful protest is a constitutional right, but it remains subject to lawful and reasonable restrictions. Is Unfurling the Tricolour an Offence? The Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971, and the Flag Code of India govern the respectful display and use of the National Flag. Unfurling the Tricolour is not, by itself, automatically an offence. Any allegation must be assessed against the applicable law, the circumstances and any specific lawful restriction. If an authority alleges a violation, it should identify the particular law or order and explain how the conduct contravened it. THE CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION If citizens peacefully unfurl the National Flag to express their grievances, the issue is not whether they love their country. The issue is whether their conduct violates a specific, applicable legal restriction. Patriotism and peaceful dissent are not mutually exclusive. Respect for the National Flag must coexist with respect for the Constitution that protects our freedoms. THE TRICOLOUR BELONGS TO THE PEOPLE OF INDIA. PEACEFUL DISSENT IS NOT, BY ITSELF, DISLOYALTY TO THE NATION. Jai Hind! Col Amit Kumar, Veteran

LOVE IS NOT A CRIME. HUMAN DIGNITY IS NOT NEGOTIABLE. The reported execution of a Bangladeshi couple in Saudi Arabia raises grave questions about human rights, justice, and the dignity of human life. Does any society truly understand the purity of love if relationships are met with punishment rather than compassion and justice? Human rights must not be sacrificed at the altar of social customs, moral policing, or rigid interpretations of law. Every person deserves dignity, a fair trial, and protection from cruel or disproportionate punishment. The world must raise its voice, demand transparency, and hold authorities accountable wherever human rights are violated. People must consider peaceful boycotts and other lawful forms of protest to oppose such practices. I appeal to Muslims across the world, along with people of every faith and none, to speak up for compassion, justice, and humanity. This is not about targeting a religion or its followers; it is about standing against practices that violate fundamental human rights. WHEN LOVE IS SILENCED AND HUMAN LIFE IS DEVALUED, HUMANITY ITSELF STANDS ACCUSED. #HumanRights #LoveIsNotACrime #Justice #HumanDignity #StandForHumanity

The requirment at present!!