9/11 Consensus Panel

This is crazy… Vitamin C in DMSO ELIMINATED the MAJORITY of the two most common skin cancers within 12 weeks. 2 studies brushed the inexpensive solution on cancer lesions twice daily: 86.7% of BASAL CELL SKIN CANCERS ELIMINATED 56% of SQUAMOUS CELL SKIN CANCERS ELIMINATED

When the editor of the world’s most prestigious medical journal concluded that much of the clinical research it published could no longer be trusted, the problem was no longer abstract. Marcia Angell, a pathologist who joined the New England Journal of Medicine staff in 1979, rose to executive editor and then served as interim editor-in-chief from 1999 to June 2000. She stepped down after more than two decades at the journal, formally to write a book. The deeper context was her growing conviction, formed from years of editing manuscripts, that pharmaceutical industry influence had compromised the independence of clinical research. She and previous editors had enforced strict conflict-of-interest rules, yet industry-sponsored studies continued to arrive with designs, analyses, and selective reporting that favored the sponsor’s product. Negative results were often suppressed, side effects minimized, and “academic” authors frequently carried undisclosed financial ties. In a widely cited 2009 New York Review of Books essay, Angell wrote the line that crystallized her position: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.” She described an industry that had shifted from discovering useful drugs toward marketing, co-opting academic medical centers, researchers, and even the journals that were supposed to serve as independent arbiters. Her 2000 editorial “Is Academic Medicine for Sale?” and later book The Truth About the Drug Companies expanded the critique, arguing that commercial priorities systematically distorted what research was done, how it was conducted, and what reached publication. Angell’s departure marked the end of an era of tighter editorial resistance to industry influence at the NEJM. Her public statements afterward made clear that she viewed the problem as systemic rather than isolated: once the bulk of clinical research depended on commercial funding, journals could no longer function as reliable filters of medical evidence.

THE 9/11 NARRATIVE WAS LOCKED IN BEFORE AMERICA COULD ASK QUESTIONS The official account of 9/11 remains one of the most consequential narratives in modern history. Twenty-five years later, the unanswered questions have only grown. Within a day, al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden were blamed. The public accepted the explanation, and the War on Terror followed. But questions surrounding Building 7, the collapse of the Twin Towers, recovered passports, intelligence failures, and possible Saudi-linked support for future hijackers never disappeared. FBI and CIA warnings were on the table before the attacks. Agents raised concerns about flight-school activity, and Zacarias Moussaoui was already in custody. Yet the threat was not stopped. Then came the Patriot Act, rushed through Congress after 9/11 along with wars, surveillance, and a permanent expansion of government power. If an event of that scale happened today, the official story would face far more immediate public scrutiny. Independent media and online platforms have made it harder to accept government narratives without question. Jimmy Dore breaks down why Americans are questioning 9/11 more than ever, and why they should keep asking questions.

Something happened just weeks after 9/11 and the Patriot Act that quietly laid the groundwork for Covid-era lockdowns and mandates. 99% of people didn’t notice. But it gave state governors “extraordinary powers” in a “public health emergency.” Bookmark this. In December 2001, the CDC published the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act. Even Wikipedia admits that it grants “tremendous powers” to state governors while “disregarding medical privacy.” Since it was published, at least 43 states passed it “in whole or in part.” This is why Leslie Manookian “knew from the beginning that Covid was a scam.” “Because I knew about the Model State Public Health Emergency Act.” “I knew about the Patriot Act.” “The PREP Act.” “The Smith-Mundt Act.” “The NDAA of 2012.” She saw what millions of people missed. “They’re clearly setting us up to do something.” @LeslieManookian @BretWeinstein @thedarkhorsepod