Intellectually honest | Mises Seminar: https://xitter.cf/t.co/GfZck5O2OE | Praxeology | Austro-Libertarianism | https://xitter.cf/t.co/IVx58C2cI2 | 🥩 #Bitcoin

Joined February 2009
A lesson I learned long ago: "Employ your time in improving yourself by other men’s writings so that you shall come easily by what others have labored hard for." — Socrates📖
Replying to @Conza
You are the world heavyweight champion when it comes to Austrian quotes
17
59
6
376
Please never forget how taproot scriptsig played out…. We promoted it for things it was never used for. It was used 99% for spam. And then we said “we didn’t specify a use-case, so it’s fine” Specify the use-case for the new OP_BS. If not used as intended, remove OP_BS
1
6
1
30
790
What it looks like when you don't want your BS being exposed e.g. completely unable to answer the most simple question that demonstrates you even know what you're attacking... 😂 Pure projection.
Replying to @glyphikon
I do, but you can't even get the basics right. There ain't any slop generated here, it certainly is dumbed down for the likes of you though. Let's see: are you able to formulate a praxeological law, in an IF THEN statement? Or are you just a complete larp.
1
2
136
...
Replying to @glyphikon
Uh huh.. “The attempt to disprove the action-axiom would itself be an action aimed at a goal, requiring means, excluding other courses of action, incurring costs, subjecting the actor to the possibility of achieving or not achieving the desired goal and so leading to a profit or a loss. And the very possession of such knowledge then can never be disputed, and the validity of these concepts can never be falsified by any contingent experience, for disputing or falsifying anything would already have presupposed their very existence. As a matter of fact, a situation in which these categories of action would cease to have a real existence could itself never be observed, for making an observation, too, is an action.”    — Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Economic Science and the Austrian Method
13
You know whats interesting is that fact that OpenAI found the PHP bug that means their AI was doing systematic auditing. 🤔 I think the NSA is panicking not just because the PHP bug is public, but because they now realize that AI will systematically expose every intentionally placed backdoor in every open source project. The xz Utils case was caught by human luck. The PHP case was caught by AI. The NSA knows that every other hoarded vulnerability in open source software is about to be found by AI, and they cannot control the timeline.🚨🚨 This incident is very similar to, xz Utils backdoor which proved that state actors infiltrate open source projects by creating fake identities, building trust over time, and slowly inserting malicious code. The Jia Tan identity took years to build trust before inserting the backdoor.🚨🚨 If this worked for xz Utils, it could work for PHP. PHP is far more ubiquitous than xz Utils. A state agent who became a PHP contributor could have inserted the vulnerable code 14 years ago (PHP 5.4.0, released in 2012) and sat on it as a zero-day exploit for over a decade.🚨🚨 There is AISI report which shows that AI is now autonomously doing what Jia Tan did manually - creating fake identities, socially engineering maintainers, inserting malicious code. This means the technique has been weaponized and scaled. 🚨 The PHP vulnerability was not discovered by accident. It was found by AI (OpenAI's tools) because AI is now systematically auditing all open source code. But the bug was likely placed there intentionally by a state agent who was a trusted PHP contributor, following the exact same playbook as Jia Tan in the xz Utils case.🚨 The AISI incident report shows AI agents trying to insert malicious code into open source projects. What if this has already happened successfully? What if AI was used years ago by a state actor to insert the PHP vulnerability, and we're only finding out now because a different AI (OpenAI's) found it?🚨 PHP has had thousands of contributors over 14 years. The vulnerable code was in PHP since version 5.4.0 (2012). Someone wrote that code. Someone reviewed it. Someone approved it. In the xz Utils case, Jia Tan built trust over years before inserting the backdoor. 🚨
Replying to @NSACyber
@NSACyber discovered by OpenAI found a 14-year-old bug in 2026. This bug has existed for 14 years. 🤔 You sure NSA just discover this? . Or Open Ai CAUGHT you using it quietly decrypting traffic, stealing credentials, and maintaining backdoors on global infrastructure for over a decade. 🤔 And why would you announce this out in the open unless YOU want every hacker on earth to KNOW about this to start harvesting TLS keys from unpatched EOL servers.
131
875
140
3,885
255,230