
Hunter teks all the wayyy || obsessed with marketing & AI building/CF –› @LegacyCreovate
hogwarts 🏰
Joined May 2025
- Tweets42.4K
- Following360
- Followers1.2K
- Likes74.4K
Hunter retweeted
Google just beat Opus 5.5 and Astra
the new model Gemini 4 Carbon:
- scores 59 on AA Intelligence Index
- beating GPT-6 Astra and Opus 5.5
- 88.2% on SEC-bench Pro
- 54.8% on ExploitGym vs GPT-6 Astra
And now the main question for @OfficialLoganK
when will this model be available to everyone?
Introducing Gemini 4 Carbon, it's a big jump over Argon which we released just 2 weeks ago.
Gemini 4 Carbon is SOTA on cyber, long horizon tasks, ranks #1 on Artificial Analysis V5, significantly improves on usability in domains like coding, and is more aligned.
i usually don't post about AI or its related things but i am doing W things with it
also this video is literally a fully generated clip and i am enjoying man haha
i am generating those viral reels/tiktok clips regularly with different fake girls characters
this is generated by kling 4.0, and also there is one mistake in this if you noticed?👀
🤖 Made with AI
Hunter retweeted
Kimi k3.1 vs GPT-6.1 Terra
just decided to create an interesting and fairly simple table tennis game
I was pleasantly surprised by the result in terms of the speed of creating this game
Kimi k3.1 - 48 minutes
GPT-6.1 Terra - 34 minutes
but I think these models have a lot to improve
well traditional transaction signatures are getting a serious upgrade on starknet
hash based STARK proofs and programmable accounts are quietly redefining smart contract security
instead of forcing massive network wide upgrades for new security features (weird)
now thankfully developers can deploy new signature methods natively and thats good
thats actually what true cryptographic adaptability looks like:
- hash based STARK proofs
- native account abstraction
- future proof engineering iyk
ngl man this flexibility is a massive win for protocol developers and thats W for @Starknet
explore more with starknet below
> quantum.starkware.co
🤝 Paid partnership
Hunter retweeted
I just found some alpha right before bed
any AI can write an email
making it on-brand, in the customer's language and not broken in Outlook is the hard part
Migma does that last mile:
drop a link → it pulls the brand → one email in 30+ languages
Kiwi Sheepskins, a family shop from New Zealand, now runs its emails like a brand with a whole marketing team
slippers are still handmade, emails aren't
New case study: Kiwi Sheepskins × Migma
A small New Zealand family business with customers around the world.
Less time building emails. More time for the message and the customer.
Their story, in four slides →
things you should confirm first before putting your efforts into ambassador programs:
> there should be no raffles system
> no referral multiplier criteria
> only for limited creators (maximum 30)
> clear payment no locked assets
> always check how much is their pool
so you have to look out for all the things before confirming any contract or something
another opportunity missed, someone said right that time flies lol
100k usdt reward pool is actually good man better than many agencies campaigns
well i need suggestions from you guys, in which campaign should i participate rn?
It's a wrap on the @MEXC Katalyst campaign.
• 2100+ creators joined
• 4,050+ posts published
• 17M+ impressions generated
$100,000 in rewards has now been distributed to winners.
Head to My Earnings on Kaito Studio to check yours↓
was sick for about 2 days and my body says lets have some rest hunter
thats why i was inactive well now feeling better but not fully recovered i got some energy
btw happy new week to you guys❤️
Hunter retweeted
Kimi k3.1 vs Opus 5.5
I compared these two models and how these models can create a Black Hole
Creation time:
Kimi k3.1 - 30 minutes
Opus 5.5 - 48 minutes
which model did it better?
ayoo got a highlights from creator wire
ngl its pretty good stats according to me well iyk and also i got 134 smart followers
first time using any tool to check my stats btw lol
Introducing: Creator Wire Insights
Show off your stats with Creator Wire Insights.
For both companies and creators, to understand the data is key for growth.
> Creators, what works, which posts goes viral, what to replicate.
> Companies, you're able to analyze the creators your work with, and distribute your incentives to creators more aligned with your protocol.
Check your insights today: app.creatorwire.xyz/insights
Hunter retweeted
Bear market effects (scam)
as you have seen @BallerDeGreat scammed my friend hunter!
he also scammed with me..
first i asked for upfront but he didn't pay me and told me he will pay right after the post, i posted with the proper research of the project and i found the tech is good so i posted it
then i asked for the paymet the mfer tells me he will talk with dev then he will pay me
then i slept, next morning i wake up and asked for paymet mfer told me the dev says he cant pay me because they havnt earned from memecoin lol
thats doesnt makes any sense wth he didnt tell me about it, like he cant pay if theyll not earn
anyways ill never work with this guy again
and also learned a lession never deal with amyone without upfronts
report his account guys!
WEB3 CREATORS, BE CAREFUL WHO YOU WORK WITH!🚨
i want to share my experience with @BallerDeGreat and let the receipts speak for themselves
here’s what actually happened:
he approached me for a launch post for $REET (his or someone else memecoin newly launch
> before posting, I asked a simple question is what’s the payout per post?
he confirmed the payment was $5 per account, even mentioning that making four posts would earn $20
i told him that $5 was too low for a memecoin shilling campaign and asked for at least $20
well after some back and forth, i finally proposed $10 for one post
> His response:
“ok make 1 post let's see”
I agreed, created the post, published it, and sent him the X link as requested
he had also explicitly approved attaching a video clip to the post iyk
but after I completed the work, suddenly the story changed (peak drama):
> he just told me: “Your post do not qualify”
like there's no no clear qualification criteria had been shared with me beforehand
i asked how my post suddenly didn't qualify when I had followed the instructions?
> then came the unusual explanation lol:
he claimed the dev didn't like the post and it doesn't meet the dev's taste lmao hell
i even asked him to pay at least half of the agreed $10 iyk just $5 as a compromise
> his response:
“Sorry not in my power”
so the work was done, the post was live, and the payment was still refused, am i idiot?😂
and this wasn't just my experience, my friend @Jackyheree also had a similar issue with him
according to my friend, the chat was later deleted, which made preserving the evidence even more important
i'm sharing the proofs so the ppls can review the conversation and make up its own mind
> i just wanna ask from him (simple question)
if there were clear qualification criteria as you said i didn't qualify, you're larper
please show where they were communicated before I published the post?
well this space needs accountability and transparency not unclear terms after the work is done
all proofs attached, DYOR before accepting paid campaign offers!!!
WEB3 CREATORS, BE CAREFUL WHO YOU WORK WITH!🚨
i want to share my experience with @BallerDeGreat and let the receipts speak for themselves
here’s what actually happened:
he approached me for a launch post for $REET (his or someone else memecoin newly launch
> before posting, I asked a simple question is what’s the payout per post?
he confirmed the payment was $5 per account, even mentioning that making four posts would earn $20
i told him that $5 was too low for a memecoin shilling campaign and asked for at least $20
well after some back and forth, i finally proposed $10 for one post
> His response:
“ok make 1 post let's see”
I agreed, created the post, published it, and sent him the X link as requested
he had also explicitly approved attaching a video clip to the post iyk
but after I completed the work, suddenly the story changed (peak drama):
> he just told me: “Your post do not qualify”
like there's no no clear qualification criteria had been shared with me beforehand
i asked how my post suddenly didn't qualify when I had followed the instructions?
> then came the unusual explanation lol:
he claimed the dev didn't like the post and it doesn't meet the dev's taste lmao hell
i even asked him to pay at least half of the agreed $10 iyk just $5 as a compromise
> his response:
“Sorry not in my power”
so the work was done, the post was live, and the payment was still refused, am i idiot?😂
and this wasn't just my experience, my friend @Jackyheree also had a similar issue with him
according to my friend, the chat was later deleted, which made preserving the evidence even more important
i'm sharing the proofs so the ppls can review the conversation and make up its own mind
> i just wanna ask from him (simple question)
if there were clear qualification criteria as you said i didn't qualify, you're larper
please show where they were communicated before I published the post?
well this space needs accountability and transparency not unclear terms after the work is done
all proofs attached, DYOR before accepting paid campaign offers!!!
ngl, traditional exchange VIP programs feel like whale only clubs iyk
like where you need $100k+ just to unlock basic perks, thats weird mannn
and most retail traders are completely locked out from day one and they got nothing
but @MEXC is flipping this model with their relaunched VVIP system (banger actually)
instead of massive deposit requirements, every user gets an initial MScore of 350 and enters standard tier automatically
- there's no minimum deposit
- zeromonthly volume thresholds
- 4% mexc card cashback on daily spending
from there, your M-Score updates dynamically based on account security setups
like passkeys and Advanced kyc, platform activity, and ongoing trading metrics
well honestly it is worth visiting the VVIP dashboard to review your active M-Score
lmk if you’ve already checked your current M-Score on the dashboard?👀

































