Cryptonymous

Looks like FIP 16 will pass. I don't know how Flare presented the info regarding this proposal, but I assume they said it would definitely be amazing for the network. What the design changes do is effectively consolidate power, money, and centralize the network. I know they've stated they'll burn $FLR, but burning tokens does not solve price because it addresses supply side concerns, without offering demand side solutions. Im afraid they'll end up subsidizing select builders on the network, removing competition, and I think like all central planning this will cause the network to stagnate while enriching a handful of people on the dime of users. Im very happy to be proven wrong. I hold enough $FLR that meaningful price appreciation would affect my quality of life significantly. But as someone who thinks in systems, not vibes, not abdicating my thinking to authority, it doesnt seem like a good plan if the honest to goodness goal is price appreciation rather than power consolidation. When I design things there's no conscious narrative in my mind. Im told people think in words, there's constant chatter, they say "if this, then that, then this, then that" as a chain of events that must be processed. I don't think like that. I feel the shape of the thing, I can feel where an imbalance exists, how to remediate it spatially, and then work backwards to articulate just how to do it. With the FIP 16 proposal, the shape I feel isn't good. It feels strangled, suffocated, heavy and given to extreme inefficiency. Im very curious how this all plays out. Maybe Im missing some information? Maybe Flare has deals pending that require this structure and it will be explosive? I can only evaluate what's presented though.