xitter.gq/pjcolbeck/status/21212…
Please share.
BREAKING: This morning I submitted a formal request to CISA to conduct Physical Configuration Audits (PCAs) of the electronic voting systems in numerous communities throughout Michigan.
Title 6 Section 659 grants CISA the authority to conduct such examinations upon request of local officials. Local officials have made such requests as have I as a former Michigan State Senator.
We have evidence of Wi-Fi hotspot tied to a voting machine in use to support early voting. The PCA would determine if a modem was installed on the voting machine. This observation could be used as a predicate to examine network communication logs that would confirm remote transmissions that compromise election security.
Communications of election results prior to closure of polls on election day is a felony violation of Michigan law (MCL 168.765a(13)). Any machine capable of doing so would not only violate the machine certification requirements, it would also call into question the certification of any election conducted that depends upon results produced by these machines.
NOTE: Recounts are insufficient to detect any manipulation of election results compromised by the use of machines capable of remote transmissions. Any bad actor with privileged access to election results prior to election day would be able to use that information to determine how many fake ballots would need to be inserted to address any gaps between actual results and their projected results. Fake ballots can be injected in a variety of ways by individuals with access to a list of low propensity or illegal voters in the state Qualified Voter File (QVF). The most obvious involves unsupervised poll workers at Early Voting sites fraudulently assigning voters to ballots in the QVF, then printing ballots on demand and inserting them into tabulators. Recounts are useless in the detection of fake ballot injections. Voters who show up to vote in person on election day and are told that they already voted provide one means of detecting such fraud but it is rarely investigated.
Attached are photos which provide a sample of the evidence that I have in support of my PCA request. They include a photo of the product labeling for the certified "Made in USA" configuration and non-certified "Made in Taiwan" product labeling. I have also included a sample of the Wi-Fi hotspot evidence in my possession (and the possession of federal and state officials).
Welcome to the wonderful engineering world of Configuration Management ;)
@RealLindellTV @CISAgov @elonmusk @realMikeLindell @DataRepublican @EmeraldRobinson @StephenM @Curiousityfirst
Please share and ensure that your County participates.
#Georgia #arizona #Pennsylvania #michigan #alaka
#Elections2026 #ElectionIntegrity
Is the voting machine that counted your vote one that was certified?
Nobody routinely checks.
A Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) answers one question: is this equipment the same hardware, firmware and software that was approved?
CISA's election services are FREE.
Ask your clerk to request a PCA...before machine vendors change the configuration in use for the #2026Election.
See how:
electioncrimebureau.com/pca/
@elonmusk @RealLindellTV @realMikeLindell @CISAgov @CISACyber
2
146
DogAndBone @Curious Cat retweeted
BREAKING: This morning I submitted a formal request to CISA to conduct Physical Configuration Audits (PCAs) of the electronic voting systems in numerous communities throughout Michigan.
Title 6 Section 659 grants CISA the authority to conduct such examinations upon request of local officials. Local officials have made such requests as have I as a former Michigan State Senator.
We have evidence of Wi-Fi hotspot tied to a voting machine in use to support early voting. The PCA would determine if a modem was installed on the voting machine. This observation could be used as a predicate to examine network communication logs that would confirm remote transmissions that compromise election security.
Communications of election results prior to closure of polls on election day is a felony violation of Michigan law (MCL 168.765a(13)). Any machine capable of doing so would not only violate the machine certification requirements, it would also call into question the certification of any election conducted that depends upon results produced by these machines.
NOTE: Recounts are insufficient to detect any manipulation of election results compromised by the use of machines capable of remote transmissions. Any bad actor with privileged access to election results prior to election day would be able to use that information to determine how many fake ballots would need to be inserted to address any gaps between actual results and their projected results. Fake ballots can be injected in a variety of ways by individuals with access to a list of low propensity or illegal voters in the state Qualified Voter File (QVF). The most obvious involves unsupervised poll workers at Early Voting sites fraudulently assigning voters to ballots in the QVF, then printing ballots on demand and inserting them into tabulators. Recounts are useless in the detection of fake ballot injections. Voters who show up to vote in person on election day and are told that they already voted provide one means of detecting such fraud but it is rarely investigated.
Attached are photos which provide a sample of the evidence that I have in support of my PCA request. They include a photo of the product labeling for the certified "Made in USA" configuration and non-certified "Made in Taiwan" product labeling. I have also included a sample of the Wi-Fi hotspot evidence in my possession (and the possession of federal and state officials).
Welcome to the wonderful engineering world of Configuration Management ;)
@RealLindellTV @CISAgov @elonmusk @realMikeLindell @DataRepublican @EmeraldRobinson @StephenM @Curiousityfirst
DogAndBone @Curious Cat retweeted
BREAKING: Today, as a former Michigan State Senator and a Wayne County resident, I formally asked the Wayne County Board of Canvassers to require a Physical Configuration Audit (PCA) of our voting machines before the 2026 election results are certified.
A PCA is a hands-on inspection that checks whether the hardware, software and network configurations of machines actually in use match the machines that were tested and approved.
What I found:
- The voting machines I personally inspected during pre-election testing in Canton, Livonia and Detroit don't match the unit tested for certification.
- The tested unit is labeled "Made in USA."
- The machines in use in Wayne County are labeled "Made in Taiwan." They also come from a different serial-number series and carry a later circuit-board revision. The factory that built them has not been publicly identified.
- Dominion's own internal parts list, prepared in wake of their testimony before Congress in 2020, showed that about 48% of the parts in this tabulator model came from China. Dominion is now owned by Liberty Vote.
- Michigan's 2019 state certification report described a modem-equipped tabulator configuration alongside the federal certificate. That federal certificate listed modems as not supported, and the modem-equipped model was not on its list of certified hardware.
- The only public hardware test record for this tabulator shows a "Made in USA" unit. I have found no public record that the "Made in Taiwan" units now in use were tested for certification.
Why it matters:
- If any of these machines contain communication hardware that isn't in the certified configuration, such as a hidden modem, the chain of custody for the 2026 election can't be fully verified. The Board would then have no physical proof that results weren't accessed or changed before polls closed.
- "Made in Taiwan" units of the same model have also been documented in Barry County and Allegan County, so this goes beyond Wayne County.
- Similar configuration mismatches have been found in other states.
I have also submitted formal Requests for Investigation to federal authorities.
My hope is simple: a transparent, professional PCA of Wayne County's tabulators, with the results shared with the public.
#2026Election
H/T Narelle
@RealLindellTV @realMikeLindell @MikeGarafolo @MrJustinBarclay @TrueTheVote @PatrickByrne @Curiousityfirst @TruckerRandy @AttyStefLambert @DHSgov @PeterTicktin @SheriffLeaf
DogAndBone @Curious Cat retweeted
Replying to @SenDanSullivan
Well @senDanSullivan you may want to look into this apparently according to the official site Mary got 95.35% of the Federal Overseas Absentee Votes👇
DogAndBone @Curious Cat retweeted
FOREIGN INTERFERENCE: There is significant evidence of foreign interference into the #2026Election.
Per EO 13848, the DNI Intelligence Report on foreign interference in our elections is due on the President's desk by December 18, 2026. The AG and DHS Secretary report on the effects of such interference upon our election infrastructure is due by February 1, 2026 if the DNI report is delivered on time.
@RealLindellTV @realMikeLindell
Reconciling the ballots in Maricopa. I had previously posted that the numbers weren't adding up for early ballots versus returns that I was tracking. Here is where I made the mistake thinking that the Election Day and Early ARS 16-579, being tabulated, saved and uploaded to the server was then static numbers. However, it appears given the latest drop, those are still being tabulated nearly one week on. 5,000 since last Friday (2nd Screenshot)...
I previously posted a 12K discrepancy between Maricopa's check-in numbers and results - perhaps Door 3 again...
Can someone, anyone can explain this...
DogAndBone @Curious Cat retweeted
👊
Congratulations to Freedom Caucus Fund-endorsed @EliCraneAZ, winner of the AZ-02 General Election!
So another Maricopa County numbers don't add up post.
Election Night Maricopa County Announcement 265,000 Cast a Ballot in Person on Election Day.
(Election Day In Person + Early Mail Ballot Scanned - all saved to CF cards as accepted ballots)
Total Number of check-in's = 252,703 (R+38K) @StealthPolling
Variance 12.3K
Posted ballots for Results (203K+48K=252K) accurate to the 5th November.
Are these missing Door 3 Ballots again, anyone? anyone?
NB: Provisionals are accounted for separately
@Rach_IC @BlehmLawAZ @mattvanbibber #maricopa #arizona
@steganmes I was the one that pointed out to the official EV trackers that they were using the Primary election for their base data.👇
1
54
DogAndBone @Curious Cat retweeted
JUST IN: AP projects Republican Abe Hamadeh has won the U.S. House Arizona District 8 matchup defeating Democrat Bernadette Greene-Placentia. More election results: fox10phoenix.com/news/2026-a…
DogAndBone @Curious Cat retweeted
JUST IN: AP projects Republican Mark Lamb has won the U.S. House Arizona District 5 matchup, defeating Democrat Elizabeth Lee. More election results: fox10phoenix.com/news/2026-a…
Something smells off, the results of this election show major interference.
In Maricopa 85 to 90 percent of independents had to have voted for Democrats for the results we got. Not probable. @Bannons_WarRoom
4
328
Sorry - but I'm calling BS on Maricopa's numbers. I'll break it down for you all.
1. Going into today - Maricopa had received in total 973K ballots early in person and mail in.
Total first drop 1,017,405. Extra 44,000 sign ver, opened and tabulated.
8. Announces that the first drop of results are those that are received through Oct 31. Totals show only 930,818.. - Results posted 1,017,405





































