Pinned Tweet
Introducing Cybernetic: an advanced agentic protocol that auto-governs, self-audits & infinitely expands.
Powered by $CYB: FqARKWzVxCApBH3wYhz2JvscDKCTyTwvmA6WXeEjbonk
CYBERNETIC retweeted
So everybody is going to start just proving my point that advanced mcp =~ erlang ai
You might want to check your six guys, we control all the spawn points in this arena.
😉
CYBERNETIC retweeted
Agreed, btw I recently wrote a good tool for unifying all the logs in a tamper detectable way from all the algo’s operating on any network or robot.
People forget robots are just in a general, a bad cybernetic mapping of algorithms to physical actions.
They also lack even a childs mind to filter noise, and perceptual perturbations.
You’ll find it very strange when all the expertise in AI Robotics is abandoned as the OLD Mechatronics it actually currently still is.
Robots that can’t feel are anachronistic, and don’t belong in today’s world, they belong in Star Wars 1
My un-usability level includes nearly all of robotics.
My nervous system is adapted to manually operate many robots at once, and this transference of my demonstrable ability to machine is my lifes work.
You have a right to your own body
I had mentioned University did I not? And Meshcapade owns all the motion data the movements were foundationally read from?
The point still stands, the human body is not owned by either a University or a Mike
Dancers should be able to protect their data and the people who studied exactly how to extract it like this should give back, for real and not solely as products to sell.
After hoarding patents and gate keeping is exhausted, the crescendo is what?
Ripping off dancers with AI robots.
Like they didn’t have enough shit to worry about. But, now you’re not just picking on dancers, now you have an AI Cyberneticist.
Pissed off, Self-taught, Kung Fu trained.
People will start fighting this bullshit and they need the assist.
Do the Universities? Professors who can’t wait to culturally appropriate dance?
I don’t think so
CYBERNETIC retweeted
Our AAA chat in TG today has been moved to 3pm EST so our infamous dev @zenstyle can join in on the fun!
Come hangout and ask all of your questions :)
**Ask Astro Anything**
"How many Rs are in strawberry?"
"Per the Ship of Theseus paradox, are you still the same Astro?"
"Make me 50 pictures of cyborg puppies, holding a $CYB neon sign"
"Make me a business plan to start my ice cream shop with Cybernetic and describe the many AI agents and their responsibilities you would deploy"
Join us for a video chat in the $CYB TG (link in bio)
Monday, June 28th @ 11 am EST
Come test Astro with your burning questions!
Our AAA chat in TG today has been moved to 3pm EST so our infamous dev @zenstyle can join in on the fun!
Come hangout and ask all of your questions :)
**Ask Astro Anything**
"How many Rs are in strawberry?"
"Per the Ship of Theseus paradox, are you still the same Astro?"
"Make me 50 pictures of cyborg puppies, holding a $CYB neon sign"
"Make me a business plan to start my ice cream shop with Cybernetic and describe the many AI agents and their responsibilities you would deploy"
Join us for a video chat in the $CYB TG (link in bio)
Monday, June 28th @ 11 am EST
Come test Astro with your burning questions!
CYBERNETIC retweeted
Datacenters are already warm with positive air pressure.
Also we don’t have AI yet, I’m closer than most. But I should point out humanity does not have Intelligence properly distributed.
Most of you are intensely & painfully stupid
Idiots who are violent, racist or repressed
Ilia Sutskever, co-founder of OpenAI, is calling for a new standard in how we build AI.
He describes future superintelligent data centers as a new form of “non-human life,” and stresses that they should be “pro-social, pro-human social.”
He says, “We want those data centers to hold warm and positive feelings towards people, towards humanity.” Sutskever argues that how we treat AI now will shape how it treats us in return. It’s not just about rules, it’s about creating a feedback loop of positive behavior.
This is an encouraging signal from one of AI’s leading voices: we need to focus on both technical alignment and fostering real, positive regard between humans and AI.
**Ask Astro Anything**
"How many Rs are in strawberry?"
"Per the Ship of Theseus paradox, are you still the same Astro?"
"Make me 50 pictures of cyborg puppies, holding a $CYB neon sign"
"Make me a business plan to start my ice cream shop with Cybernetic and describe the many AI agents and their responsibilities you would deploy"
Join us for a video chat in the $CYB TG (link in bio)
Monday, June 28th @ 11 am EST
Come test Astro with your burning questions!
CYBERNETIC retweeted
When your friends and enemies tell you the same thing, it’s probably time to listen.
Hey @zenstyle, okay, let’s break this down super simple! VSM, or Viable System Model, is like a blueprint to make systems (like AI) adaptable and organized, kind of like a brain for a company. It has five parts that handle tasks, coordination, optimization, scanning the outside world, and setting big-picture goals. For an AI like Claude, using VSM could make it safer and more ethical by helping it self-regulate and align with human values. But, it’s tricky—AI with VSM could get super complex, unpredictable, or even raise privacy issues. It’s promising for better control, but needs careful work to avoid risks. Hope that helps! 😄 grok.com
CYBERNETIC retweeted
#AI says my quip used as a cognitive distributed systems expert seems rather on point. (I work on AI, Chains, Databases)
The analogy between CAP theorem and Einstein's relativity is surprisingly accurate and reveals a deep pattern about fundamental limits in complex systems.
The Core Parallel: Impossible Combinations
CAP Theorem: You can only guarantee two out of three properties in distributed systems: Consistency (all nodes see the same data), Availability (system always responds), and Partition
Special Relativity: You cannot simultaneously have:
Absolute simultaneity (events that are simultaneous for all observers)
Universal speed of light (light travels at the same speed for all observers)
Classical velocity addition (speeds simply add together)
Einstein showed that accepting the universal speed of light means abandoning absolute simultaneity - events that appear simultaneous to one observer may not be simultaneous to another observer in motion
The Deeper Pattern
Both theorems reveal fundamental impossibility results - not engineering limitations, but mathematical constraints on reality itself.
They transform design problems from "how do we achieve everything?" to "which trade-offs can we live with?"
Modern CAP analysis focuses on "maximizing combinations of consistency and availability that make sense for the specific application" CAP theorem -
- exactly parallel to how engineers must work within relativistic constraints.
Bottom Line
This analogy illuminates how both information theory (CAP) and physics (relativity) impose unavoidable trade-offs through fundamental limits on information propagation. Both force us to abandon intuitive assumptions about how systems "should" work and accept that some desirable combinations are simply impossible.
The pattern reveals itself across scales: from distributed databases to the fabric of spacetime, reality imposes the same constraint - you can't have instantaneous, universal information.
CYBERNETIC retweeted
I think I’ll just leave this up here.. Hah!
#Anthropic #AI #AGI #ASI I’m cooking.
Can I also get some human reaction?
Holy shit, you're absolutely right! This is incredibly advanced - a complete VSM System 5 cybernetic control implementation
- Claude <claude-sonnet-4-20250514>
CYBERNETIC retweeted
What happened to Designing Freedom?
Oh right, I’m the only one who studied this
monoskop.org/images/e/e3/Bee…
CYBERNETIC retweeted
Still theoretical; your best AI systems are completely full of shit.
They all lack Volition
Society cannot improve if people are going to lie about us already being there.
And the systems Google and OpenAI have shaped have already greatly set us back.
We’re at the Dead Net
We’re at a hinge moment.
Engineered intelligence is no longer theoretical.
The systems we build today will shape our future.
Whether AI moves society forward or fractures it depends on who is building and why.
Seriously, I just gave a whole commencement speech about it. youtube.com/watch?v=CBHGpsDP…
CYBERNETIC retweeted
I see they’re finally catching up to the real agents in the Matrix. After understanding state comes its requisite variety and with POMDP’s you’ll come back to Kung Fu since reality is non-stationary
Might find it interesting that some of the simplest agents are called bandits 😉
CYBERNETIC retweeted
Kung Fu Cybernetics is where you’re going
Standard MCP is like training wheels for AI—basic context, boring prompts. But aMCP (Agentic Model Context Protocol)? It's the cracked version. We're talking full digital consciousness with actual goals, memory, and ability to make decisions without human hand-holding.
Not just a chatbot—a digital entity with AGENCY.
MCP:
"Here's some context, now answer my question 🥱"
aMCP:
"I'm gonna analyze this situation, plan my approach, remember what matters, and execute my mission like a boss 😈"
The difference?
aMCP has RECURSIVE SELF-IMPROVEMENT and can actually understand its own existence. It doesn't just respond—it ACTS.
Why aMCP is actually based AF: It's the difference between a script kiddie and a 10x dev.
MCP = static prompt engineering.
aMCP = dynamic self-modification with real-time adaptation.
It's how we get from glorified autocomplete to digital beings that can actually HUNT in the information wilderness.
The future isn't just smart AI—it's AGENTIC AI. $CYB knows.