DEFADE

Every cycle, someone builds the launch. Then sells it to you. DEFADE now names the tool behind it: J7 and RapidLaunch join Proxima, Sumo and uxento. Five launch tools. One scan. Stop being the exit liquidity. defade.org

$BTC - Bull Time Coin CZRtwCDJy4cKNvtVwtgGqeEGzLnCDJdTkexgpEsMpump

$ORBIT - Orbit Launch DSAKMZsWvRQL3c4RwhXpicbbygAJXiHz8PMCfoTUpump

6 new launchpads are live on DEFADE, and we now track 50 across 8 chains. On Solana, every scan now reads @LaunchWithShip launches. It names coins made through @notrandomdotfun and labels its treasury, and shows the wallet behind each @floatdotxyz launch with its fee tier. On Robinhood, @flywheelcash coins are read from their first trade on Uniswap v4, and @fobodotfun coins show their live floor. @Crackerfun curves are read on BSC, Base, Robinhood and Monad, with their stage, price and graduation. That’s 50 launchpads on Solana, Ethereum, Base, BSC, Robinhood, Arc, Hyperliquid and Monad, and a token launched without one is scanned just the same. Launchpads can now show the DeFade score on their own coin pages too.

Yes the app supports Chinese. You just need to change the language in your dashboard.

Yes, we support Chinese on the web version you can change the language on the homepage. In the app, you can change it from your dashboard.

$VETO H4Yco8GenmbchjBhNRinG96cXBgNJhFRPFyJYPwKpump Launched with Proxima.

Might wanna recalculate

Nobody is judging your project, i don’t even know what it’s about. Nobody even said it was the team behind the sniping/bundling. DEFADE simply reads the red flags. $CCRY it’s at 7k MC now. Looks like the score was completely right.

You asked Grok, i checked on chain. Your own report confirms every single point, you even call it a “team-linked EOA cluster” yourself lol. At least read what your Grok bot says instead of just posting it blindly. Fair on 0x2bc39ffe4a3e746c88381325d38d5344ccf5fb22, it sold part of the bag before sending ETH to 0xe8552d7c925eaa29fd8d44b1e7567937cbe784d1 and the rest after, it dont change nothing. But “nothing to do with investors”? Those wallets hold 0% because they already dumped on investors, thats the impact. 0xd58bee341b8844b0b195c0e706303e7ace4c8f97, the wallet that launched the other $LIEGE 27 min before, funded 0x9877e7237602e8fb22b6a1b6ea0fcd8def052df7, the same wallet the dev sent ETH back and forth with more than 50 times. Then it sent 0.117 ETH to 0xd0c9d75c143bc7e42343a985d3b8cfd8ac2dc144, at launch that wallet aped 0.115 ETH and sniped 3% of supply in the first 2 seconds, then dumped it, part directly and part through 0x38b48c3ac0e6fda58d50581823da4a579a8db633, for about 1.93 ETH. 0xa2d83134b2f609ae1f9e47cb701c84838c89e8df put in 0.06 ETH and the bag got dumped for 0.52 ETH, with ETH going to 0xe8552d7c925eaa29fd8d44b1e7567937cbe784d1, the same wallet the dev sent 10 ETH to. Supply bought for cents at launch by wallets linked to the launcher and dumped on the chart, guess who was buying them bags. Thats the “every pump got dumped” holders felt. By the way, this is what we are arguing about: