Carlo Dade retweeted
With CUSMA negotiations ongoing and a 50% tariff deadline looming, our ICYMI @policy_mag #TrumpTariffs highlights since Canada Day...
From @policy_school's @DadeSPP
"Trump’s 338 Tariffs as Provincial Divide and Conquer"
bit.ly/4fq1qPZ
#cdnpoli #trade
Carlo Dade retweeted
UPDATED: Our Expert Group on Canada-US Relations Series on Navigating Trump II bit.ly/42x0tkk
@PerrinBeatty
Fen Hampson
@Thomas_dAquino
@lherman8
@DonaldColinRob1
@MHallFindlay
@DrewFagan4
@izzyscompanion
John Weekes
@ExnerPirot
@DadeSPP
@TCSargent
Carlo Dade retweeted
Since 2025, the United States has negotiated a series of Agreements on Reciprocal Trade (ART). The new ARTs are executive arrangements negotiated, implemented, modified and ended by President Donald Trump with no congressional participation.
This research workshop paper by @DadeSPP explores how ARTs will continue to impact trade relations with the U.S., with additional insights into the ongoing CUSMA review: spp.ucalgary.ca/publications…
Un litro de leche: Law and Order and the North American ART Negotiations carlodade.substack.com/p/un-…
While we're waiting for news from Wash DC, some news from Denver.
The 10th Bag - Canadian tariff impact on Americans: a couple of dimes and pennies. carlodade.substack.com/p/the…
Carlo Dade retweeted
"What changes with Section 338 tariffs is that they can be explicitly, rather than implicitly, province specific."
@policy_mag Specials
@policy_school's Carlo Dade @DadeSPP
with
"Trump’s 338 Tariffs as Provincial Divide and Conquer"
bit.ly/4fq1qPZ
#cdnpoli #trade
Carlo Dade retweeted
Fantastic piece by @policy_school's @DadeSPP laying out the unprecedented utility of the 338s as a provincially customized economic coercion tool...
"What changes with Section 338 tariffs is that they can be explicitly, rather than implicitly, province specific."
@policy_mag Specials
@policy_school's Carlo Dade @DadeSPP
with
"Trump’s 338 Tariffs as Provincial Divide and Conquer"
bit.ly/4fq1qPZ
#cdnpoli #trade
Carlo Dade retweeted
In the wake of #Trump's 338 tariff threat,
our updated @policy_mag series
"The Expert Group on Canada-US Relations on Navigating Trump II"
with new pieces by @DadeSPP and @lherman8
tinyurl.com/4wbyxtwm
With many thanks to
@CU_NPSIA
@policy_school
@CAGlobalAffairs
#cdnpoli
Carlo Dade retweeted
See our July 22 @policy_mag piece by @policy_school's @DadeSPP:
"Trump’s 338 Tariffs as Provincial Divide and Conquer"
bit.ly/4fq1qPZ
#cdnpoli
Experts warn Trump may be driving wedges between provinces with threatened tariffs, @withfilesfrom reports nationalnewswatch.com/2026/0…
While we're waiting for news from Wash DC, some news from Denver.
The 10th Bag - Canadian tariff impact on Americans: a couple of dimes and pennies. carlodade.substack.com/p/the…
Feds announce creation of Canadian domestic trade service lnkd.in/gAkTrmvj
Congrats @EleanorO_MP @PrairiesCanEN
@CanadaWestFdn argued for this for decade, recently @policy_school
@Ethan_Lou ran op-ed last year: Removing provincial trade barriers A for idea F for execution
calgaryherald.com/opinion/co…
New North America Initiative @policy_school about 2 release paper w/ specific proactive steps 2 respond something new for Canada
Would've been out earlier, but peer review🤬
@ABDanielleSmith @BizCouncilAB @albertachambers @calgaryeconomic @GlobalEdmonton
From July
“However, there is a more significant change working its way through US courts…(that) will either limit President’s ability to impose tariffs–or reinforce it. This means Canada should not rush into a deal w/ Trump & should instead wait it out.” theglobeandmail.com/business…
politico.com/news/2026/02/11…
Original IEEPA legislation required only concurrent resolution, simple majority in both houses to override executive order on tariffs. Unrelated case, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha (1983), struck use of concurrent resolutions to do this.
We are not seeking a seat at the table, we're building a new table for our shared continent. That quote was repurposed from the President of @ASU
@policy_school
ICYMI: ‘We cannot afford to be complacent’: Why Canada needs a radical rethink of North American relations
This episode is presented in partnership with the New North America Initiative at the School of Public Policy (@policy_school).
thehub.ca/podcast/video/we-c…
Carlo Dade retweeted
Below👇 is a perfect example of the shambolic incoherence of Alberta separatism.
Bruce and Keith are the leading legal theorists around Alberta separation. They’re both intelligent guys who I respect. One says separation would have no impact on treaties with First Nations. The other says separation would end the treaties and lead to a complete reset on aboriginal rights.
This is not a small detail.
The history of Alberta separatism is one of constant infighting. That’s why dozens of separatist groups and parties have come and gone over the past 50 years.
Some of the separatists are convinced that it means cold turkey secession. Others say it’s a license to become half-pregnant by negotiating a “sovereignty association” fantasy. Others claim already to be discussing with the US Administration annexation by the United States.
Folks that can’t even agree on what separation means, or its fundamental implications, have no business dragging us all into a highly months long shouting match that will leave permanent divisions, and undermine investor confidence in Alberta.
I beg to differ. Independence is a repudiation of the existing constitutional order. Treaty rights and Aboriginal rights are part of that order. Independence means a fresh start, and a chance to fix old ideas that no longer make sense.
A successful referendum gives a mandate to negotiate terms to leave. Everything will be on the table in those negotiations. Treaties were deals made with the Crown. In an independent Alberta, if done right, there will be no Crown. Authority will eminate from the people. In a free and independent Alberta, all citizens should be subject to the same laws and standards. Special status and entitlements based upon lineage and group identity should not exist



















