
Developer TS/React(Native) Computer Science Student @TU_München
München, Bayern
Joined March 2016
- Tweets108
- Following214
- Followers52
- Likes1.1K
Felix Moser retweeted
Come work on cell / battery production at Giga Texas & Giga Berlin! tesla.com/battery-jobs
Felix Moser retweeted
Rules 🎳 Everybody wins, there’s no lottery ✌️ (1) Retweet before Monday 11:59pm Pacific Time. (2) Retweet should be public and from a Twitter account created at least a week ago. (3) Send us a DM to claim your license. (4) We’ll start sending the free licenses on Tuesday.
Replying to @kaufland
Leider kein Kaufland bei mir in der Nähe. Hätte euch als Dank gerne ein paar Reiswaffeln abgekauft. Gut reagiert 👍
Probably... Currently trying to isolate it to a particular module. I was just very surprised that the error kept coming up even though I thought that I had the current compatible version.
Thanks for the answer! Just got it working by setting up a new project... No idea, why it didn't work previously by manually updating it.. Suspect some other weird dependency :/
The other ones were related to 3rd party modules.. After removing them, it was just this error / warning left... App is usable again, but I deleted the error-statement to make it go away... Not the best solution :/
forums.expo.io/t/expo-39-and… the error was just thrown in react-navigation and I couldn't retrace it to my code besides my used navigators
Replying to @expo
I really wanted to love sdk 39, but I only run into errors with react navigation... When do you gonna support newer versions of it? My app is currently unusable :/
Replying to @_42________ @nikolamotor
I was you a few hours ago. Actually just stop replying to this kid. He can not even process what you say and is too busy defending his holy grail with insults and blurry excel sheets
Replying to @nikolamotor
Ok, I give up now. Actually tried to have a constuctive discussion here, but you just keep insulting me. I only hear stories of the 2000s and other BS. Just keep your h2 and play with it until you run out of money
Replying to @nikolamotor
I completsly agree on the storage point. My problem is, how poorly the fuel cell tries to regain this energy + you can't put strain on it, so you always need to use a battery to compensate peak performance. For it is too much effort for to little results
Replying to @nikolamotor
Don't get me wrong: I just vote for the objectively best method at the moment and if you show me a method which might help H2 outperform electric, I'm open to trade my tesla for this kind of car
Replying to @nikolamotor
That's as much as I could break it down for you BRO... If you want to hear more about every single point I invite you to sign up for Electrical Engineering on my uni. Looking forward for your improvements to the system
Replying to @nikolamotor
Electric:
100% renewable energy
-5% transport/storage
=95% fuel production eff
Car itself:
-5% AC->DC
-5% battery charge eff
-5% DC->AC
-10% engine eff
=> Overall eff: 70-73%
Sources (World bank, IEA, German government)
Replying to @nikolamotor
Fuel cell:
100% energy input
-30% electrolysis
-26% storage and distribution
= 44% fuel production eff.
Now in the car:
-50% in fuel cell
-5% dc/ac conversion
-10% engine efficiency
=> Overall eff: ~22-28% (combustion 13) 1/2

